By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Direct Messages: The Eighth Tripartite Summit of Mediterranean countries and Turkey’s role
    October 30, 2020
    Growing international rejection of the coup in Mali
    July 25, 2021
    Latent Escalation: Will Calm in the Eastern Mediterranean Last in 2022?
    January 20, 2022
    Latest News
    Israel’s African gambit
    March 6, 2026
    Geopolitical realism: What does Washington’s return to the African Sahel mean?
    March 5, 2026
    Analysis | Manufacturing opposition: How Israel uses digital platforms to shape Iranian public opinion
    February 14, 2026
    Analysis| Turkey without terrorism: Assessing the trajectory of Turkish–Kurdish reconciliation
    February 12, 2026
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    Reasons and Ramifications of Al-Shabaab’s Retreat from its Positions
    January 30, 2023
    Reading into the Global Terrorism Index 2024: The Toll of Terrorist Activity and Most Lethal Groups (1)
    March 6, 2024
    Afghan Peace Process: Cautious Optimism
    August 17, 2020
    Latest News
    Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
    April 15, 2026
    Encrypted messages “Roaring Lion”: The hidden messages behind the name of the operation against Iran
    March 11, 2026
    Iran war developments
    March 9, 2026
    Manufacturing the enemy : Reframing terrorism in contemporary Western discourse
    March 7, 2026
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    The Law of General Average: Ever Given Compensation Crisis
    August 19, 2021
    Successive Increases: The Impact of the Russia-Ukraine War on Rebar Prices in Egypt
    May 16, 2022
    Long Shadows: The impact of informality on economic recovery
    August 4, 2021
    Latest News
    Reading into attacks on maritime navigation in the Arabian Gulf
    March 17, 2026
    Emerging economies in a world without rules: Between opportunity and predicament
    March 5, 2026
    The end of economic globalization: Reading into the 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy
    February 4, 2026
    Weaponization of Resources: The Role of Rare Earth Metals in the US-China Trade War
    May 25, 2025
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Deconstructing Ethiopia’s Media Discourse on GERD: History and the Victim Mentality
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
The future of US-Iran negotiations
Opinion
Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
Terrorism & Armed Conflict
Russia, China, and the war against Iran
Others
Continental drift
Others
Deadlock in the Strait of Hormuz
Others
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
International Relations

Deconstructing Ethiopia’s Media Discourse on GERD: History and the Victim Mentality

Dr.Ezzat Ibrahim
Last updated: 2020/08/13 at 3:55 PM
Dr.Ezzat Ibrahim
Share
12 Min Read
SHARE

It is no coincidence the Ethiopian political and media discourse on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) is summoning chapters from history, bringing to the fore what it describes as the deprivation of the Ethiopian people’s right to Nile water. The ruling political class employs Ethiopians’ history in search of commonalities to unify the people’s ranks and make the Renaissance Dam a grand milestone in their history. This gives the political class made up of allied ethnicities a breath of fresh air in a country suffering from political, economic and social woes, regardless of the rights of others, which the Ethiopians themselves advocate in their speech to the world as they propagate “the fair sharing of water resources” with Nile Basin countries.

In an Opinion article published by Addis Standard, Yeshiwas Degu Belay wrote “In one of the most popular and timeless Ethiopian songs, ‘Adwa’, Artist Ejigayehu Shebabaw (Gigi) resonates the 19th Century heroic citizenship and the symbolic, cultural and political importance, not only to Ethiopians but also to the black people as a whole, of Africa’s great victory, Adwa. “On 2nd March 1896, Ethiopians had collectively defeated the heavily mechanized Italian colonial army at the battle of Adwa, in northern Ethiopia.”

Historical approaches in Ethiopia’s media discourse

“The victory safeguarded the independence of the state in the midst of European ‘scramble for Africa’ and constituted ideologically important force for the successive Pan-African struggles in the continent and abroad,” continued Belay.

In Ethiopia, it is being said that the village of Adwa is a historical landmark that embodies popular culture and identity despite divisions and historical interpretations. When Ethiopia celebrated the 124th anniversary of its victory over Italy, the local propaganda machine linked the historical incident with the country’s ability to complete the construction of the Renaissance Dam and the start of the first filling in a clear strategy to tie the historical victim mentality with the construction of the dam. Ethiopia’s political elite is promoting the GERD as the structure which will bring back Ethiopia’s historical rights after the downstream country had “dominated” Nile waters for hundreds of years.

This was evident in Belay’s article. “It is no exaggeration to say that no other development project has been incredibly linked to Ethiopia’s past than the GERD, which is the centerpiece of Ethiopia’s development. The Adwa Victory is an exemplary event that could be conveyed by the public proverb [which means] collaboration of spider webs can tie the lion. Though divided along multiple political lines, Ethiopians were united, and are still united when it comes to the core of national interest, and battered the colossal Italian mechanized army that aimed at controlling the sovereign and its interests. Culturally so powerful that after more than a century the unified stand against colonialism remains in the minds of today’s decision-makers, the national media, and the general public. Such historical consciousness is not only to reflect on the current affairs retrospectively, but also to realize contemporary development endeavors.”

Ethiopia has launched campaigns at home and abroad to promote the mega national project since it started building the GERD in April 2011 on the Blue Nile to generate 6,500 MW of electricity. The campaigns targeted stoking patriotism and exaggerating cultural and historical experiences that were milestones for the advancement of the country. 

“The victory of Adwa must be repeated in our struggle against poverty to create a prosperous Ethiopia,” said the country’s president, Sahle-Work Zewde. In order to complete the project, Ethiopia mobilized the public at home and abroad to donate to build the GERD and for 10 years it propagated the project and charged its people morally on social media to create the image of a nation that grabs its rights from the “state dominating” Nile water.

Numerous writings indicate that the GERD presents the changing face of Ethiopia, in contradiction to the stereotypes that have been spread on global media in which Ethiopia is a poor country that lacks the ability to implement mega projects.

Post-Washington shifts

The mobilization of Ethiopian public opinion at home and abroad picked up momentum following the February talks mediated by Washington. Ethiopia abstained from signing the agreement at the last minute, claiming Washington had sided with Egypt. Voices grew louder as they spoke of “national sovereignty” and not succumbing to any pressures, even if they came from friendly major powers. In order to continue the financial and moral mobilization among Ethiopians domestically and abroad, the Ethiopian strategy was to hold Egyptian and international media responsible for presenting Ethiopia in a way it deems to be different from the reality on the ground with regard to the bases on which it built the Renaissance Dam.

The Ethiopian media claims the Egyptian media is a “propaganda machine for the state” and the international media which should be unbiased (such as Bloomberg, the New York Times, the Independent, the Washington Post, and Voice of America) is, according to Ethiopian writers, in one way or another, saying Ethiopia is acting unilaterally when it announced it filled the dam’s reservoir without agreement. According to Ethiopia’s media, the international media is deliberately creating new facts on the ground and says Ethiopia intentionally skipped the last meeting in Washington and that it plans to dominate River Nile resources. The Ethiopian media claims this kind of journalism “distorts the facts” and works in the interest of Egypt and against Ethiopia. However, Ethiopia doesn’t pay attention to other views in this fateful issue for the downstream country.

Ethiopian diaspora

In tandem with the media campaigns on social media platforms in support of the Ethiopian position, the Ethiopian government is backing what can be called “partnership with the diaspora”. GERD promotional campaigns managed to collect $56 million, out of the total cost of constructing the dam estimated at $4.7 billion, from Ethiopian expats. Development Bank of Ethiopia figures indicate a hike in GERD bond sales as soon as the initial filling was announced.

The Ethiopian Diaspora Association encourages Ethiopian expats to participate in financing the dam and supporting it diplomatically through making contacts with decision-makers in the countries where they reside. The association’s Chief Executive Director Abraham Seyoum said “the River Nile should not be a political agenda. It is about benefiting from water resources in an equitable and reasonable way.”

The office of the National Council for the Coordination of Public Participation on the Construction of the GERD is coordinating efforts with an NGO, Lift Ethiopia, to hold international events to support the Ethiopian position on the GERD and address the world. One such event, One Voice for Our Dam, promoted “the fair use of water sources and fighting poverty.”

Many countries, particularly the US, saw the emergence of associations and organizations that promote the Ethiopian position. The presence of these groups, such as the Justice for Humanity, increased during the first quarter of 2020. Justice for Humanity launched campaigns in the US and Canada to pressure the Trump administration to rectify the “US biased position”, condemn the unfair pressure exercised by the US administration on Ethiopia, promote fair use and mutual benefit, and clarify the Ethiopian position on the international stage.

These new civil associations focus on the second generation of Ethiopian diaspora in the US, Canada, and Europe to deliver messages to decision-makers, particularly at the Congress, that big changes that are taking place in Ethiopia and the Horn of Africa are worthy of support, especially in development and fighting poverty. The Ethiopian groups employ expatriate youth and direct them on social media platforms to address foreign decision-makers and advocate their version of the story. These associations also focus on countering the “fallacies” spread about Ethiopia and its GERD. Hewan Solomon, the Justice for Humanity coordinator, said “If they know the real story, friends, allies and citizen of other countries would fight along with us for this cause.”

Fifteen Ethiopian diaspora associations signed a declaration for civil organizations abroad on 27 June 2020. These organizations have branches in a number of US states, including Chicago, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Arizona, Oregon, southwest Washington, and Los Angeles.

Ethiopia’s focus on its media discourse serves a number of purposes, regardless how correct its approach is and no matter whether it sticks to the truth or not. Ethiopia’s media discourse secures financial support for the construction of the GERD through selling bonds to Ethiopian expats whose economic conditions are better than their peers at home.

This discourse also provides the moral support for the project advocated as a national cause that all the Ethiopians, at home and abroad, support. Moreover, it allows Ethiopia to apply increasing pressure on foreign policymakers in the US and Europe who are now playing key roles in negotiations. 

Related Posts

Israel’s African gambit

Geopolitical realism: What does Washington’s return to the African Sahel mean?

Analysis | Manufacturing opposition: How Israel uses digital platforms to shape Iranian public opinion

Analysis| Turkey without terrorism: Assessing the trajectory of Turkish–Kurdish reconciliation

TAGGED: Egypt, Ethiopia, Featured, GERD, Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam
Dr.Ezzat Ibrahim August 13, 2020
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Global Distancing
Opinions Articles April 24, 2020
The Neutral Mediator: Is Oman the Gateway to Arab Openness towards Syria?
Arab & Regional Studies April 8, 2023
The European Situation Towards Afghanistan Refugees
International Relations September 21, 2021
The Suez Canal amidst Global Competition (3): National Strides Outpacing Time
Public Policy April 29, 2025

Latest Tweets

//

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank providing decision-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was established in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from different generations and scientific disciplines.

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

Who we are

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS) is an independent Egyptian think tank established in 2018. The Center adopts a national, scientific perspective in examining strategic issues and challenges at the local, regional, and international levels, particularly those related to Egypt’s national security and core national interests.

The Center’s output is geared toward addressing national priorities, offering anticipatory visions for policy and decision alternatives, and enhancing awareness of various transformations through diverse forms of scientific production and research activities.

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?