By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Deconstruction Ethiopia’s Media Discourse over GERD: The “National Project” Delusion
    August 12, 2020
    Strategic partnership: Egypt’s policy on Libya during new transitional phase
    March 20, 2021
    Added confusion: Following the Withdrawal of Confidence from Dbeibeh’s government
    October 4, 2021
    Latest News
    Israel’s African gambit
    March 6, 2026
    Geopolitical realism: What does Washington’s return to the African Sahel mean?
    March 5, 2026
    Analysis | Manufacturing opposition: How Israel uses digital platforms to shape Iranian public opinion
    February 14, 2026
    Analysis| Turkey without terrorism: Assessing the trajectory of Turkish–Kurdish reconciliation
    February 12, 2026
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    Cautious Optimism: How Can the Russia-Ukraine Crisis be Contained?
    Cautious Optimism: How Can the Russia-Ukraine Crisis be Contained?
    February 23, 2022
    Why Have TikTok Security Concerns Grown Globally?
    April 16, 2023
    ChatGPT: Promising Applications, Potential Difficulties
    March 6, 2023
    Latest News
    Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
    April 15, 2026
    Encrypted messages “Roaring Lion”: The hidden messages behind the name of the operation against Iran
    March 11, 2026
    Iran war developments
    March 9, 2026
    Manufacturing the enemy : Reframing terrorism in contemporary Western discourse
    March 7, 2026
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Investing in Energy: The New Egyptian, Palestinian, Israeli Projects
    March 18, 2021
    Effective Policies: Managing Inflation in Egypt in 2021
    February 8, 2022
    Horizons of Development Owing to American Diploma Exam Problem
    October 1, 2020
    Latest News
    Reading into attacks on maritime navigation in the Arabian Gulf
    March 17, 2026
    Emerging economies in a world without rules: Between opportunity and predicament
    March 5, 2026
    The end of economic globalization: Reading into the 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy
    February 4, 2026
    Weaponization of Resources: The Role of Rare Earth Metals in the US-China Trade War
    May 25, 2025
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: The Tigray crisis: The Cost of Instability in Ethiopia
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
The future of US-Iran negotiations
Opinion
Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
Terrorism & Armed Conflict
Russia, China, and the war against Iran
Others
Continental drift
Others
Deadlock in the Strait of Hormuz
Others
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
International Relations

The Tigray crisis: The Cost of Instability in Ethiopia

Salah Khalil
Last updated: 2020/11/18 at 2:55 PM
Salah Khalil
Share
12 Min Read
SHARE

When all eyes were focused on US elections, northern Ethiopia turned into a civil war zone after Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed had announced on 4 November the launch of military operations in the northern region of Tigray. Ahmed’s declaration came in response to what he described as the attack conducted by the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) against the Ethiopian Defense Forces’ (EDF) North Command base in Tigray.

Prior to the military confrontation, reports confirmed that the EDF, Amhara Region’s Special Forces, and the Eritrean military forces were being deployed along the Tigrayan borders. This escalation is the latest in a series of growing tensions between the federal government and the TPLF, that had dominated the ruling coalition in Ethiopia from 1991 until Abiy Ahmed came to power in 2018. 

First: Reasons for rebellion in Tigray

A host of motives resulted in the TPLF’s rebellion against Ahmed’s government, starting with its loss of power and ending with Ahmed’s policies that pushed it toward involving in armed conflict against the federal government and making veiled threats of secession. 

Since Ahmed’s assumption of power, the TPLF has been feeling marginalized and scapegoated for the country’s plights. This led to the withdrawal of its ministers from the federal government in 2019, after the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) was dissolved and was the Prosperity Party was formed instead.

The TPLF objected to putting off the general election, under the claim fears of the spread of the coronavirus pandemic were mounting. Consequently, Ahmed remained in office beyond his tenure. In September, Tigray held a referendum to which the government object, branding the move illegal.

The Tigray government described Ahmed’s government as illegitimate since 5 October, and called on him to step down and form a transitional government until the general elections were held.

Second: The government’s reaction to Tigray’s rebellion 

Depending on its political and operational expertise in the management of state institutions, the TPLF took its regional capital, Mekelle, as a proactive first step to ferociously oppose Abiy Ahmed’s government. 

Like the TPLF, there are many other opponents to Ahmed’s policies, such as Oromo opposition leader Bekele Gerba, the political activist and the icon of the Oromo revolution Jawar Mohammed, Merera Gudina, the journalist and founding member of the Ethiopian Democratic Party Eskinder Nega, a number of young leaders of the Oromo Federalist Congress Party, and a number of politicians. 

The TPLF has all the capabilities of an established state in northern Ethiopia. It has a long legacy in war, government and administration. In addition, it controls the territories beyond the Amhara region, the borders with Sudan and the borders with Eritrea. Benefiting from the long struggle it has begun since the mid-1970s, it has great potential for mobilization. 

The TPLF also has an enormous developed military capacity, which makes it a fierce rival that can withstand a ferocious fight. It has financial resources and a strong foreign relations network, particularly in the process of strong communication with regional and international powers. Moreover, it has more than half of the Ethiopian armed forces and 70 per cent of the missiles and anti-aircraft equipment. 

On 31 October, the federal government decided to confront the TPLF and the Ethiopian army issued a strongly worded statement to the Tigray government after the newly appointed deputy commander of the northern region of the Ethiopian army, General Jamal Mohamed, had been detained upon his arrival at Mekelle airport and returned directly to Addis Ababa. 

It was clear from the statement that the army wanted to impose its control on the military bases in northern Ethiopia, fearing they might be used against it by the TPLF. This incident was like a dissent inside the northern base, as no one in it objected, in an indication of the strong influence of the TPLF. 

The federal government believes that the only solution to Tigray problems is war, military operations and shelling. It also believes there is no room for dialogue and peaceful resolution, especially that the TPLF has dominated the Ethiopian economy over the past three decades.

The war is a great opportunity for Ahmed’s Prosperity Party to implement its national unity vision. This is why the party has promoted war as part of its plans to undermine the federal system which provides and guarantees self-governance for all Ethiopian ethnicities. This is the matter in which the federal government and its allies from the Amhara have failed over two years of continuous work.

At the same time, Prime Minister Ahmed demanded that Ethiopians working abroad contribute to the financing of the war by transferring their money through national banks rather than through private money-transfer companies, accusing the TPLF of exploiting Ethiopian remittances from abroad through private companies and smuggling funds out of the country.

In an attempt by Ahmed to gain the Ethiopian people’ confidence and to confirm his indictment of Tigray’s attack on the military base, his government detained many TPLF members, closed the office of the Tigray Dimitsi Weyane TV channel, and prevented anyone belonging to Tigray from leaving the region through airports and borders. These actions represented collective punitive measures taken by the Ethiopian government against all Tigrayans.

Third: The repercussions of war

The current war between the prime minister and some Amhara nationalists, on one side, and the TPLF, on the other, reflects the struggle for power between the federal government and the Tigray, that had led the ruling coalition years ago in Ethiopia. 

The cost of war will be high, as it shall affect the overall economy of the country, especially given the expected second wave of the coronavirus pandemic. The war will also affect the future of all Ethiopian ethnic groups following the rise of territorial-boundary conflicts. This may lead other Ethiopian provinces to form independent states, benefiting from the current state of chaos. Recently, secession has been proposed by a number of politicians. 

According to a report published by The Economist, the current conflict between the Ethiopian government and the TPLF is a real disaster that threatens the survival of Ethiopia. Tigray is the only region that has the main base of the most powerful units of the Ethiopian army in the northern region. Its soldiers represent 50 percent of the Ethiopian army, and it includes military equipment and huge military vehicles. A large number of the military who were dismissed from all security and military services by Abiy Ahmed returned to Tigray and trained a new generation to defend the region.  

The TPLF is the best-armed and most powerful among all opposition powers in Ethiopia. Its strength lies in the veterans who participated in many wars such as the war against the Mengistu regime and the battles between Ethiopia and Eritrea in Badme between 1998 and 2000.

Apart from the military and economic aftermath of war, the political repercussions started to appear early. On 8 November, Ahmed made major changes in the top leadership of the country, including the foreign ministry, the chief of staff, the national security service, and the federal police. 

Demeke Mekonnen was appointed as foreign minister, retaining his position as deputy prime minister. Agegnehu Teshager, former chairman of the Amhara Prosperity Party, was appointed head of the Amhara Regional State. The former head of Amhara, Temesgen Tiruneh, was assigned as director-general for National Intelligence and Security Service. General Berhanu Jula was appointed chief of staff, and General Abebaw Tadesse was appointed deputy chief of staff. Former foreign minister Gedu Andargachew became a national security adviser. 

It is noteworthy that most of the cabinet reshuffles came in favor of the Amhara, confirming the continuation of the strong alliance between Ahmed and the Amhara. These reshuffles could have other purposes related to Ahmed’s quest to contain any potential threat of the Amhara leadership, especially in light of the risks of the highly-complicated political and security situation.

Tiruneh is a key figure who has been in high-profile positions in the recent changes. Previously, he worked with Ahmed in the Information Security Agency, and has been close to and well informed of the precise details of the TPLF’s influence at the time it had been in control of the country’s governance.

Fourth: The future of the crisis

In conclusion, the current war being waged by the Ethiopian government in the Tigray region seems to complicate the situation further in Ethiopia and will not lead to a decisive victory for any party due to several factors. The military operation in Tigray makes all Tigrayans feel that the war being waged by the Ethiopian government is a war against them all. This feeling motivates solidarity and cohesion among Tigrayan troops in the battlefield. 

Furthermore, the war heightened hate speeches and ethnic conflicts in the country, with some ethnicities using the war to launch large-scale hate speeches on Ethiopian social media platforms. The recent war also makes the majority of Ethiopians lose confidence in state institutions and fuels separatist conflicts that could strike other Ethiopian regions. 

Related Posts

Israel’s African gambit

Geopolitical realism: What does Washington’s return to the African Sahel mean?

Analysis | Manufacturing opposition: How Israel uses digital platforms to shape Iranian public opinion

Analysis| Turkey without terrorism: Assessing the trajectory of Turkish–Kurdish reconciliation

TAGGED: Abiy Ahmed, Ethiopia, Featured, Tigrey crisis
Salah Khalil November 18, 2020
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print
Salah Khalil
By Salah Khalil
A researcher at Al-Ahram Center for Social and Historical Studies

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Power Play: Why Is Azerbaijan Setting Its Sights on the Horn of Africa?
Asian Studies Others May 22, 2025
Dangerous Repercussions and Limited Responses: Floods and Climate Change in South Africa
International Relations May 26, 2022
Rethinking the European Security Equation
Opinion March 23, 2025
On the Anniversary of 11 September: Terrorism Proliferates
Opinions Articles September 20, 2022

Latest Tweets

//

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank providing decision-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was established in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from different generations and scientific disciplines.

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

Who we are

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS) is an independent Egyptian think tank established in 2018. The Center adopts a national, scientific perspective in examining strategic issues and challenges at the local, regional, and international levels, particularly those related to Egypt’s national security and core national interests.

The Center’s output is geared toward addressing national priorities, offering anticipatory visions for policy and decision alternatives, and enhancing awareness of various transformations through diverse forms of scientific production and research activities.

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?