By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    The Conflict of Visions on GERD
    June 15, 2020
    The Muslim Brotherhood and the West: Reading through Official UK Documents (3)
    March 1, 2021
    The European Situation Towards Afghanistan Refugees
    September 21, 2021
    Latest News
    Israel’s African gambit
    March 6, 2026
    Geopolitical realism: What does Washington’s return to the African Sahel mean?
    March 5, 2026
    Analysis | Manufacturing opposition: How Israel uses digital platforms to shape Iranian public opinion
    February 14, 2026
    Analysis| Turkey without terrorism: Assessing the trajectory of Turkish–Kurdish reconciliation
    February 12, 2026
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    Messages of military drills: Is the region on the brink of a new war?
    April 5, 2021
    Europe amid US–Iran Escalation: Can It Play the Diplomat or Become Entangled in the Crisis?
    April 13, 2025
    The Future of Relations between Al-Qaeda, Taliban and Islamic State After Al-Zawahiri’s Death
    August 27, 2022
    Latest News
    Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
    April 15, 2026
    Encrypted messages “Roaring Lion”: The hidden messages behind the name of the operation against Iran
    March 11, 2026
    Iran war developments
    March 9, 2026
    Manufacturing the enemy : Reframing terrorism in contemporary Western discourse
    March 7, 2026
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Why Does Egypt Expand in the Establishment of International Schools?
    October 24, 2020
    The National Strategy to Combat FGM: What’s Next?
    October 14, 2021
    Epidemiological Surveillance in the Egyptian Health System
    October 15, 2022
    Latest News
    Reading into attacks on maritime navigation in the Arabian Gulf
    March 17, 2026
    Emerging economies in a world without rules: Between opportunity and predicament
    March 5, 2026
    The end of economic globalization: Reading into the 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy
    February 4, 2026
    Weaponization of Resources: The Role of Rare Earth Metals in the US-China Trade War
    May 25, 2025
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: The Consolidated List of Terrorism: New Entities and Candidates
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
The future of US-Iran negotiations
Opinion
Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
Terrorism & Armed Conflict
Russia, China, and the war against Iran
Others
Continental drift
Others
Deadlock in the Strait of Hormuz
Others
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Analysis

The Consolidated List of Terrorism: New Entities and Candidates

Khaled Okasha
Last updated: 2022/07/05 at 11:31 AM
Khaled Okasha
Share
9 Min Read
SHARE

Through its different organs, the United Nations supports member states in their fight against terrorist threats they are exposed to. One obvious form of this support is the UN Security Council Consolidated List (CL), which includes all individuals and entities identified by the United Nations as posing direct threat to global peace and on whom the UN Security Council imposes sanctions, including asset freezing, travel ban, and arms embargo. 

The inclusion in the CL opens the door to security and judicial prosecution of individuals and entities included, let alone forms of security and intelligence cooperation that may be introduced and adopted by different countries.

This collaborative effort, which may take place on bilateral or multilateral basis, is undoubtedly the most successful outcome, particularly in view of the complexity of prosecutions and given the ability of members and leaders of these terrorist entities to disguise themselves, work undercover, and move from one country to another, from one region to another, and maybe from one continent to another. Recently, within each terrorist organization, there is a group in charge of securing safe havens in specific countries and regions for the fleeing members and leaders. 

This makes the UN reports all the more significant, considering their effectiveness in counter-terrorism operations, allowing access to areas that remained intractably difficult to reach for long periods of time, tracking funds and freezing assets whose revenues are used to support terrorist activities, enabling security services to stop weapon flows to these organizations if there is certainty that a “terrorist entity” would be the end user, even if intermediary elements and entities were involved in the deal. This is certainly reinforced by the availability of intelligence information that set the UN’s mind at ease regarding the inclusion of a specific terrorist organization to the list. 

Al-Qaeda, the Islamic State (IS), and the Taliban –along with other branches and entities that are ideologically connected to them– are the three major organizations that held most of the CL’s top spots. In 1999, Security Council Resolution 1267 was issued, imposing an air embargo on the Taliban and freezing its assets, a resolution that later gave rise to what came to be known as the CL. In 2011, two new resolutions divided the list into two sections, one focusing on Al-Qaeda and the other on the Taliban, with two separate bi-annual reports on the global threats posed by each group and its networks prepared. In 2015, the CL was expanded under Resolution 2253 to include the IS. At that time, the UN Monitoring Team widened the scope of its reports on Al-Qaeda to include the threats posed by the IS as the new splinter of Al-Qaeda.

Essentially, the Monitoring Team has two main functions, namely assisting the Sanctions’ Committees in drawing up UN sanction lists and conducting regular assessments of terrorist threats to international peace and security. These assessments are often based on information derived from reports drafted by UN member states that are shared with the Monitoring team. Largely, most of the member states’ reports focus on observations on threat assessment. In this vein, controversy arose over proposals of member states to include specific entities or individuals that their security agencies found play a key role in threatening peace and security, necessitating including them in the CL and exposing them to the Security Council sanctions.

A few days ago, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres submitted a report to the Security Council, which included the emerging threats posed by major organizations, in preparation for the next report to be issued in July 2022. Concurrently, the Monitoring Team is reviewing the recent reports issued in May 2022 to identify the terrorist entities that were not included in the Security Council’s CL. Names not included in the CL include 38 individuals and 16 entities. The UN Secretary-General recommends that member states work on collecting more information about these organizations to assist the Monitoring Team in the process of including them on the updated CL, particularly if they fulfill the required criteria, including participating in financing, planning, facilitating, preparing or carrying out works or activities of the three major terrorist organizations, or in their name, on their behalf, or in support of them and selling or supplying them with weapons or related equipment, or transferring weapons to them, or on their account.    

Perhaps prominent among individuals to be added to the CL are Sami Jasim Al-Jaburi who is held by the Iraqi security authorities as the first deputy to the caliph of IS; Ugandan Medi Nkalubo, leader of the Allied Democratic Forces rebel group in Congo, a group that has declared its allegiance to IS in all the regions in which it operates; and Khaled Batarfi, leader of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and a Yemeni leader that has been involved in terrorist activity for decades and who made several video statements in which he announces the organizations’ goals and future plans against the West and Israel. 

Strangely enough, Taliban’s Supreme leader Hibatullah Akhundzada is still not included in the CL, despite Taliban targeting more than 100 former Afghan officials under his leadership, all of whom were murdered straightway. Recently, he made a public appearance following the Taliban’s takeover. The same goes for Adnan As-Sahrawi, leader of IS in the Great Sahara who is a principal suspect in massacres that took place in Niger, Mali, Mozambique, and Burkina Faso.

Entities that are seemingly on the way to be included on the UN CL include the Egyptian Ansar Beit l-AMaqdis organization operating in North Sinai. Its members are under investigation before the Egyptian judicial authorities, accused of committing terrorist operations proven by evidence, material evidence, and confessions; the Macina Liberation Front of Ansar Dine in Central Mali whose leader is listed on the CL of individuals due to his terrorist activity in the Sahel and Sahara region; and Ahl as-Sunnah wal-Jamaah, aka IS Mozambique, an aggressive organization that uses sweeping armed violence, similar the Boko Haram group in killing, slaughtering, intimidating and kidnapping women and children during raids that completely destroy villages and areas in northern Mozambique.

In short, in the terrorism arena, there are several terrorist entities and individuals but the lack of security or judicial information remains a dilemma, given the vulnerability of the security and state agencies in several countries, as is the case in Yemen and Sahel states. While it may take some time, inclusion in the CL remains an important factor in besieging terrorist threats and prosecuting terrorists.

Related Posts

The future of US-Iran negotiations

Manufacturing the enemy : Reframing terrorism in contemporary Western discourse

Analysis | Manufacturing opposition: How Israel uses digital platforms to shape Iranian public opinion

Analysis| Turkey without terrorism: Assessing the trajectory of Turkish–Kurdish reconciliation

TAGGED: Featured, terrorism, UN Security Council
Khaled Okasha July 5, 2022
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print
Khaled Okasha
By Khaled Okasha
General Manager

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

National Dialogue and the National Community
Opinion September 18, 2023
تعدد المحاور: قراءة في تحولات السياسة الخارجية التركية
Reading into Turkey’s Foreign Policy Shifts
International Relations August 23, 2022
Post-Gaza Conflict—The Way Back
Opinion September 2, 2024
The Middle East and the Democrats
Analysis November 19, 2020

Latest Tweets

//

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank providing decision-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was established in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from different generations and scientific disciplines.

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

Who we are

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS) is an independent Egyptian think tank established in 2018. The Center adopts a national, scientific perspective in examining strategic issues and challenges at the local, regional, and international levels, particularly those related to Egypt’s national security and core national interests.

The Center’s output is geared toward addressing national priorities, offering anticipatory visions for policy and decision alternatives, and enhancing awareness of various transformations through diverse forms of scientific production and research activities.

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?