By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Mutual Benefits: The Egyptian-Greek Maritime Boundary Delimitation Deal
    August 23, 2020
    Egypt-Sudan Rapprochement in the Face of Major Challenges
    March 20, 2021
    The Economic Repercussions of Ethiopia’s Conflict
    October 9, 2021
    Latest News
    Gradual Dismantling: Is Tunisia Headed Towards Dissolving Ennahda?
    September 30, 2023
    The India-Middle East-Europe Corridor: Political Drivers and Challenges
    September 25, 2023
    BRICS Plus and Africa: Challenges and Mutual Gains
    September 21, 2023
    Enhancing Readiness: Germany Leads NATO Exercises in the Baltic Sea
    September 19, 2023
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    Political Considerations: The Motives and Implications of Lifting Five Foreign Terrorist Organizations off US Terrorist List
    Political Considerations: The Motives and Implications of Lifting Five Foreign Terrorist Organizations off US Terrorist List
    May 28, 2022
    NATO and Russian Air-Sea Maneuvers in the Baltic Sea
    July 7, 2023
    War in Yemen: Iran’s changing tactics
    December 12, 2020
    Latest News
    Explaining the Rise of Daesh in Syria
    August 26, 2023
    Clashes in Tripoli: Do Rapid Developments in Libya Clash with the Road Map?
    August 22, 2023
    Ukraine’s Special Operation: A Stopgap
    August 1, 2023
    Why are Terrorist Organizations Increasingly Relying on Economic Jihad?
    July 27, 2023
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Green economy: Egypt’s gateway to sustainable development
    March 27, 2021
    Promoting Social Protection: Egypt’s Commodity Subsidy System
    March 1, 2022
    International media and Egypt’s role in the Gaza ceasefire: The case of Qatar’s Al-Jazeera
    May 29, 2021
    Latest News
    Goals and Mechanisms: Integrating the Informal Economy into the Formal Economy
    September 23, 2023
    Playing the Pressure Card: The Ramifications of Boosting US-Taiwan Economic Relations for China
    September 17, 2023
    Egypt’s Long-Term Debt Rating Upgraded to Stable
    September 10, 2023
    Whither Inflation Rates in Egypt?
    August 24, 2023
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Library
    • Digital Editions
    • Periodicals
    • Special Editions
  • Shop
  • العربية
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Hard Choices: Is Iran Facing an Impasse in its Nuclear Talks?
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Fifty Years On: The Realities of the October War (3)
Opinion
Gradual Dismantling: Is Tunisia Headed Towards Dissolving Ennahda?
Arab & Regional Studies
The India-Middle East-Europe Corridor: Political Drivers and Challenges
Arab & Regional Studies
Goals and Mechanisms: Integrating the Informal Economy into the Formal Economy
Economic & Energy Studies
BRICS Plus and Africa: Challenges and Mutual Gains
African Studies
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Analysis

Hard Choices: Is Iran Facing an Impasse in its Nuclear Talks?

Dr. Mohamed Abbas Nagy
Last updated: 2022/08/20 at 7:20 PM
Dr. Mohamed Abbas Nagy
Share
9 Min Read
SHARE

The European Union-hosted indirect talks on the nuclear deal between Iran and the US have been wrapped up in Vienna on 8 August. The delegations returned back to their capitals awaiting political decisions to be made, that will –to a large extent– define the possible paths for the talks that have been taking place for the past 18 months without an outcome.  

The reactions of the involved parties, especially the main two, Iran and the US, show that it is now up to Iran, whether it will accept or reject the draft proposed by the EU High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell, and which has been the core of this recent round of talks, or will demand additional talks to come to a compromise on some lingering points.

At this point, Iran seems to be facing a tough impasse. The US confirmed that it would sign a deal based on Borrell’s draft, which means that the text contains terms that are sufficient to finalize the deal. The US seemed to be hinting that Iran is to decide the destiny of the talks. Moreover, Russia, Iran’s closest global power, has approved the draft and awaiting other parties’ decisions.

Conflict of Agreement

The limited choices that are available for Iran create a conflict, meaning that if it approves the proposed draft, it automatically approves the American approach, as the US has already endorsed the European draft, and did not express any opposition or reservations.

Even though no details have been released from the draft except for the two main points; the American sanctions and the Iranian nuclear commitments; a couple of indicators show that it does not fulfill Iran’s preconditions with regard to removing the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps from the terrorist organizations list, as well as assurances for US non-withdrawal from the deal again, in addition to closing investigations over some Iranian nuclear activities that have been observed at three locations, and which have not been explained to the IAEA by the Iranian authorities:

First: The US approval of the European draft, which means that it does not contain any of the above mentioned preconditions, especially that Biden’s administration has assured that it will neither remove the Revolutionary Guard from the terrorist list, nor give assurances for non-withdrawal from the deal.

Second: The European countries have stressed that Iran must not lay demands that are outside the nuclear deal frame, specifically, the closing of investigations on suspicious nuclear activities.

The Europeans insist on carrying out the investigations and getting clear answers from the Iranian side for the queries raised by the IAEA, in addition to committing to the deal’s terms of strict supervision on Iran’s entire nuclear activities through reactivating the surveillance cameras, and handing their memory cards to the IAEA.

Needless to say that in case Iran agrees on that draft and all its included terms, beside economic and nuclear multiple consequences, huge pressures will be exerted on President Ibrahim Raisi’s administration domestically by its allies who adopted –from the beginning- its perspective based on altering the nuclear deal to make it more stable and credible, i.e., more durable than the current one which has been hardly hit by the American withdrawal on 8 May 2018. Pressures have been previously exerted on President Hassan Rouhani’s administration together with accusations that it has caused what has happened to the current deal, while –in fact- it could not achieve more than what had been achieved by previous governments.

Risk of Rejection

On the other hand, in case Iran rejects the draft, it is going to face huge pressures and strong criticism from the west, as it will bear the responsibility of the failure of the negotiations. The US has conveyed to the other powers involved in the negotiations that it supports a deal based on that draft. Hence, holding Iran responsible for the failure will make it face more consequences which do not seem to be minor, especially with the approach of the midterm congressional elections in the US this coming November. Such rejection will encourage the US to upgrade the sanctions, and perhaps apply stricter measures, after easing them during the past period of time, especially with regards to exporting Iran’s crude oil, as an incentive for it to pursue a new deal.

In addition, the western countries that became closer to the American policy towards Iran, may activate what is called “Snapback” strategy within the UN Security Council, which converts all US sanctions into global sanctions that will inflate pressures on Iran who is already suffering a harsh economic crisis which the government failed to contain.

Even though Iran did not exclude such scenario in the past period of time, which appeared in its pursuing of the “Looking East” policy through upgrading its mutual relations with Russia and China, in addition to some regional states, beside turning around the US sanctions. This path’s consequences may be disastrous to it, concurrently with the Israeli intelligence operations inside Iran that target nuclear infrastructure, military locations, prominent scientists in both nuclear as well as missile projects, in addition to Revolutionary Guard leaders, and which may resume during the coming period of time.

Predicament of Procrastination

Finally, there is the probability of Iran’s inclination to extend talks to reach consonance about some points of dispute. Some Iranian officials and media platforms already started this path. This may be referred to the consequences that the two previous paths impose on it.

The first does not fulfill all its requirements, while the second may develop facts that need to be avoided, at least for the present time.

Despite the statement by global powers involved in the talks that they are looking forward to Iran’s response, it does not mean that they will easily tolerate its demands. Even though, if they do agree on more negotiations, which is very possible, there is no guarantee that they will eventually agree on Iran’s terms, or at least reach a compromise on some. Meanwhile, Iran is putting pressure on them by making progress with its nuclear project, and assuring over and over that it possesses the technical capabilities needed to develop a nuclear weapon, but a political decision needs to be made.

Conclusion: It can be said that Iran has limited choices in the nuclear negotiations, which is worrisome to Tehran, as it permanently seeks larger degrees of freedom and maneuverability on both the regional and international stages.

However, whatever the path negotiations take based on Tehran’s decision, the impasse will have direct impact on the balance of powers in the region and Iran’s weight in it, in addition to the escalation with Israel which will –most probably– continue its confrontation regardless the outcomes of Vienna talks.

Related Posts

Fifty Years On: The Realities of the October War (3)

Fifty Years On: The Realities of the October War (2)

National Dialogue and the National Community

Fifty Years On: The Realities of the October War (1)

TAGGED: European Union, Featured, Iran, Nuclear talks
Dr. Mohamed Abbas Nagy August 20, 2022
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Two years on Stockholm: Yemen between comprehensive settlement and conflict management
International Relations December 31, 2020
How Will the World React to Ethiopia? (1)
Opinions Articles March 20, 2021
Iran’s nuclear program: New contexts and possible scenarios
International Relations April 17, 2021
AFRICA… Equilibrium severs .. Promising future
Publications June 15, 2020

Latest Tweets

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank, providing decisions-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was establised in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from diffrent generations and scientific desciplines. 

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2022

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?