By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Egyptian-Greek Trade Relations to Prepare for the Next Step
    September 1, 2020
    Iran’s nuclear program: New contexts and possible scenarios
    April 17, 2021
    The Sino-Australian Rising Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific
    October 16, 2021
    Latest News
    Looking West: India’s Strategy and Relations with Egypt
    February 4, 2023
    Messages from the Polisario Front’s 16th Congress
    February 1, 2023
    A Trump Card: Morocco Maximizes Benefit from Phosphate Amid Ukraine War
    January 31, 2023
    Engaging in Brinkmanship: Scenarios for Escalation in the Korean Peninsula
    January 12, 2023
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    Israel’s Cyber ​​Dome: Hallmarks and Motives
    Israel’s Cyber ​​Dome: Hallmarks and Motives
    August 15, 2022
    A Multi-dimensional Affair: Women and Terrorism in Africa
    June 14, 2020
    Messages of military drills: Is the region on the brink of a new war?
    April 5, 2021
    Latest News
    Reasons and Ramifications of Al-Shabaab’s Retreat from its Positions
    January 30, 2023
    Task Force 59: The New US Military Deployment Pattern in the Middle East
    November 30, 2022
    The Future of Relations between Al-Qaeda, Taliban and Islamic State After Al-Zawahiri’s Death
    August 27, 2022
    Israel’s Cyber ​​Dome: Hallmarks and Motives
    August 15, 2022
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Trade between Egypt and Nile Basin Countries
    April 22, 2021
    Volunteering in Egypt: Towards a Paradigm Shift
    March 15, 2022
    The domino effect: Global chip shortage crisis hits the Egyptian market
    June 5, 2021
    Latest News
    How will Forward Exchange Contracts Affect Egypt’s Market Stability?
    January 24, 2023
    Egypt’s Economic Gains from COP27
    December 14, 2022
    Global Crisis: Whither Inflation?
    December 8, 2022
    Climate Finance: Financial Resources and Investments to Address Climate Change
    December 4, 2022
  • Analysis
    • Analysis
    • Analytical article
    • Opinions Articles
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Library
    • Books
    • Digital Editions
    • Periodicals
    • Special Editions
  • العربية
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Mass Exodus: Why are Foreign Companies Pulling Out from China to India?
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Looking West: India’s Strategy and Relations with Egypt
International Relations
Messages from the Polisario Front’s 16th Congress
International Relations
A Trump Card: Morocco Maximizes Benefit from Phosphate Amid Ukraine War
International Relations
Danger and Opportunity
Opinions Articles
Reasons and Ramifications of Al-Shabaab’s Retreat from its Positions
Defense & Security
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Public Policy

Mass Exodus: Why are Foreign Companies Pulling Out from China to India?

Basant Gamal
Last updated: 2022/12/01 at 6:17 PM
Basant Gamal
Share
16 Min Read
SHARE

China, the world’s second-largest economy has recently witnessed a wave of mass withdrawals by major foreign companies towards India. Alphabet announced that it is considering transferring some of its production of the Pixel phone to India, while Apple revealed its plan to manufacture iPhone 14 phones in India as part of its efforts to diversify its production and stop its dependence on China. 

These moves have raised questions about the reasons for the exit of major companies from China to India in particular, with concerns, on the other hand, regarding India’s ability to receive these investments, especially in light of the obstacles facing foreign direct investment in the country.

Logical Motives

The reasons that prompted companies and institutions to exit the Chinese market varied, including the country’s severe measures to confront the coronavirus pandemic, the escalation of trade disputes with the United States, restricting the freedom of foreign technology companies. All these factors prompted several international chambers of commerce to conduct opinion polls of major foreign companies’ executives on investment in China. The American Chamber of Commerce in Beijing reported that 44% of the companies participating in the survey revealed shrinking investments or postponing investments decisions due to health restrictions and lockdown decisions. One in ten people said that if restrictions continue for another year, it will push them to move their operations outside the country. 

Another survey by the EU Chamber of Commerce in China showed that about 23% of Western companies are considering moving their business outside the country due to lockdown policies or political disputes. In addition, 16% of these companies said they intend to move to Southeast Asia, while about 19% announced plans to move to Europe, and about 12% to North America. The majority of companies expressed a feeling of distrust concerning business in China, with foreign industrial companies operating in China experiencing profits fall by 16.2% during the January-April period, compared to a decrease of only 0.6% of Chinese private companies’ profits, while state-owned enterprises achieved a 13.9% increase in profits during that period. These motives can be as follows:

• Zero Covid policy: China has adopted a zero Covid policy aimed at completely eliminating the coronavirus pandemic with no signs of easing such policy in the near future. The most prominent features of this policy are lockdowns, quarantines and strict tests along with travel and movement restrictions. As of May 2022, China has imposed restrictions on travelers to undergo PCR tests within 24-48 hours of their flight, in addition to antibody tests. Passengers must be vaccinated within 14 days of entering the country, and proof of negative test results and vaccination records must be provided upon arrival. Arrivals are screened at the airport with the need to complete a mandatory quarantine of at least 14 days. Furthermore, companies– with the exception of suppliers of basic commodities and food– have been forced to temporarily close until local authorities confirm that there are no new infections in the area.

These strict and restrictive policies have affected the practice of business in the country, cast a shadow on companies’ productivity, and exacerbated the difficulties of obtaining the necessary manpower to conduct business, as well as difficulties in securing the necessary supplies for production due to the disruptions of the transport and logistics sector, which raised the indirect cost of production, resulting in uncertainty among foreign investors as the pandemic highlighted the fact that it is not possible to rely on only one manufacturing center.

• Demographic factors: The demographics in China have raised concerns among foreign companies operating in the country due to the increasing likelihood of a decrease in the number of available labors, as the birth rate in the country fell for the fifth consecutive year to 7.5 births per thousand people for 2021, which is the lowest level recorded since 1949. The fertility rate of Chinese women has declined at a continuous pace over the past years, as shown in the figure below: 

Figure 1: Fertility rate per year (births per female)

Source: World Bank

In addition, the National Health Commission revealed that the country’s population growth has slowed significantly and will begin to decline between 2023 and 2025. The elderly population is expected to make up about 29.83% of the total population, which means that the problem of population aging is beginning to loom. Thus, the decline in population and the proportion of young people in the total population is likely to affect the size of the labour force, as shown in the following figure:

Figure 2: Evolution of the Population Pyramid in China (1990-2050)

Source: Population Pyramid of China, https://population-pyramid.net/en/pp/china.

The above graph shows that the percentage of youth in the total population declined from 28.891% in 1990 to 17.466% in 2022, while the percentage of the population in the labor force increased from 66.865% in 1990 to 69.125% by the end of this year. The aging rate in the country increased from 5.244% to 13.409% during the same period, while expectations indicate a decline in the proportion of the youth population to 11.447%, and the percentage of the population in the labor force to 58.726%, compared to the increase in the rate of aging to 29.827 by 2050.  In addition to the possibility of a decline in China’s workforce, foreign companies have reported that the cost of labor in China is higher than in neighboring countries due to the country’s high level of income and reduced labor supply, which increases the cost to those companies.

• Political tensions: Ongoing tensions between China and the United States over technology transfer and intellectual property rights are in the rise. Washington accused Beijing of using telecommunications equipment to spy on other countries’ networks. In addition, the two countries are constantly imposing tariffs on each other’s products, pushing companies, especially Americans, out of the country. The potential dispute with Taiwan following the visit of US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has also raised concerns of investors and companies operating in the country, as the visit prompted China to take several restrictive military and economic measures against Taiwan.

• Regulations: Chinese regulatory policies that directly target certain industries have prompted a number of foreign companies to leave the Chinese market. Yahoo announced the suspension of its services in China, and Epic Games decided to withdraw the video game “Fortnite” from China due to the difficulties imposed by the commercial and legal environment in the country, especially after imposing the strict law regulating data privacy, which determines how companies collect and store data. The law states the need to obtain consents for data collection and processing, and provide ways for users to cancel the sharing of their data, impose restrictions on cross-border data transfers, and impose large fines in case of non-compliance with the law that can reach 50 million yuan ($7.8 million), or 5% of company’s annual revenue.

Can India become a World Factory?

Foreign direct investment flows to India recorded an all-time high of about $81.97 billion in the year 2020/2021, with the technology sector accounting for the largest proportion of investments directed to the country with a share of about 25%, followed by the services sector at 12%, and then the automotive sector with an estimation 12%. This came in light of the country’s promotion of the “Made in India” initiative, which aims to put India on the world map as an international manufacturing hub. Despite India’s desire to receive foreign investment from China, there are several obstacles it may face to achieve this goal, the most important of which are:

• Difficulty in conducting business: India suffers from difficulty in conducting business, as land acquisition and ownership laws are one of the most prominent obstacles facing foreign investors in India, which also contributed to reducing their enthusiasm. The Indian government is the largest landowner in the country. While the Chinese government has provided special incentives for foreign investors such as providing tax incentives or easiness of land ownership systems, India has been experiencing a drastic slowdown in developing its own land ownership system. Thus, the government should simplify its current land tenure and offer incentives to private banks and public funds to help set up manufacturing units with foreign companies.

In addition, government approvals for projects take a long time, with the time required to start a new business about 17.5 days compared to only 8.5 days in China. The Indian government has imposed new restrictions on investments since April 2020 requiring its prior approval for foreign investments coming from countries that share land borders with it.

Based on these procedural complexities, India has only approved about 80 of the 382 investment projects received by the government from Chinese companies as of late June, demonstrating the challenging business environment facing Chinese investment and companies doing business in India.

• Protectionist policies: During the recent years, India has been adopting a protectionist trade policy with the aim of controlling the trade balance deficit and maintaining the stability of the currency value. The authorities have strengthened the import control policy, which has witnessed a sharp increase in recent months, with the increasing likelihood of targeting non-essential imports through increased customs duties, which would raise the price of some imported goods necessary for some industries, hence increasing the production cost and inhibits the profits growth. In addition, both exporters and importers in India face ever-changing and unpredictable tariffs and laws, thus they have to deal with multiple levels of bureaucracy before goods are easily transported across borders.  

• Lack of infrastructure: In addition to the abovementioned factors, India will not be able to maintain the sustainability of foreign investments without repairing its infrastructure and developing its ports. For example, it takes more than 20 days to ship goods produced at Mundra Port, India suffers from traffic congestion that may hinder road transport and delays in rail freight traffic, in addition to the need of new companies and factories of about 45 days to get electricity. The challenge is not only the difficulty of securing electricity needed to do business, but also the frequent increase in electricity costs and cuts. Accordingly, India needs to develop its own shipping lines, increase public-private cooperation, as well as port development and technology.

•Weakness in Research and Development (R&D): India’s R&D spending is among the lowest worldwide; its share of GDP is about 0.7%. compared to high rates in other Asian economies. This is due to the concentration of Indian authorities on addressing grave problems such as combating poverty and hunger, controlling the spread of diseases, and raising the quality of life of individuals. R&D also faces other constraints such as raise funding for this sector، and delaying the disbursement of funds allocated for its development in the State’s Public Budget. R&D in India also relies on grants, creating a situation of dependency in which the quality of scientific research is hindered. Moreover, the sector suffers from a shortage of skilled personnel due to disproportionality between educational curricula and labor market requirements, as well as brain drain and weak private sector participation in total R&D expenditure.

In conclusion, it is clear that the Indian market has gained a strong momentum during the past months due to the exceptional circumstances in the Chinese economy as a result of political tensions with the United States, and the strict domestic policy towards the coronavirus. Therefore, the Indian government will take serious steps to maximize the benefit from the current wave of investments through legislative reforms to investment laws, coordination between the government and the private sector, and the development of infrastructure to enable foreign investments, especially in technology.

Related Posts

Looking West: India’s Strategy and Relations with Egypt

Messages from the Polisario Front’s 16th Congress

A Trump Card: Morocco Maximizes Benefit from Phosphate Amid Ukraine War

Reasons and Ramifications of Al-Shabaab’s Retreat from its Positions

TAGGED: Big Companies, China, Featured, India
Basant Gamal December 1, 2022
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam Crisis … Dimensions, Repercussions And Future Courses
Special edition June 1, 2020
Efforts to localize industry in egypt -Communications and technology sector
Info graph June 26, 2020
GERD Back to The Fore: Contradictory Messages and Political Employment
International Relations October 18, 2020
Strategic Shift: Iran’s role in Sanaa between Proxy Management and Direct Involvement
Defense & Security November 7, 2020

Latest Tweets

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank, providing decisions-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was establised in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from diffrent generations and scientific desciplines. 

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2022

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?