By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    The Tigray crisis: The Cost of Instability in Ethiopia
    November 18, 2020
    The ethnic crisis of Qemant: The complex reality of Ethiopia’s Amhara
    July 31, 2021
    US Politicization of Human Rights against China
    US Politicization of Human Rights against China
    January 23, 2022
    Latest News
    Gradual Dismantling: Is Tunisia Headed Towards Dissolving Ennahda?
    September 30, 2023
    The India-Middle East-Europe Corridor: Political Drivers and Challenges
    September 25, 2023
    BRICS Plus and Africa: Challenges and Mutual Gains
    September 21, 2023
    Enhancing Readiness: Germany Leads NATO Exercises in the Baltic Sea
    September 19, 2023
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    Has Belarus Mediation Pulled the Plug on Wagner Rebellion?
    June 26, 2023
    Strategic Shift: Iran’s role in Sanaa between Proxy Management and Direct Involvement
    November 7, 2020
    Political Considerations: The Motives and Implications of Lifting Five Foreign Terrorist Organizations off US Terrorist List
    Political Considerations: The Motives and Implications of Lifting Five Foreign Terrorist Organizations off US Terrorist List
    May 28, 2022
    Latest News
    Explaining the Rise of Daesh in Syria
    August 26, 2023
    Clashes in Tripoli: Do Rapid Developments in Libya Clash with the Road Map?
    August 22, 2023
    Ukraine’s Special Operation: A Stopgap
    August 1, 2023
    Why are Terrorist Organizations Increasingly Relying on Economic Jihad?
    July 27, 2023
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Radical Overhaul: Egypt’s Plan to Upgrade the Railway Network
    August 21, 2021
    Fruitful Efforts: Egypt’s National Agricultural Projects and Achieving Self-Sufficiency
    June 1, 2022
    The Law of General Average: Ever Given Compensation Crisis
    August 19, 2021
    Latest News
    Goals and Mechanisms: Integrating the Informal Economy into the Formal Economy
    September 23, 2023
    Playing the Pressure Card: The Ramifications of Boosting US-Taiwan Economic Relations for China
    September 17, 2023
    Egypt’s Long-Term Debt Rating Upgraded to Stable
    September 10, 2023
    Whither Inflation Rates in Egypt?
    August 24, 2023
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Library
    • Digital Editions
    • Periodicals
    • Special Editions
  • Shop
  • العربية
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Reviving Egypt’s Foreign Policy Circles
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Gradual Dismantling: Is Tunisia Headed Towards Dissolving Ennahda?
Arab & Regional Studies
The India-Middle East-Europe Corridor: Political Drivers and Challenges
Arab & Regional Studies
Goals and Mechanisms: Integrating the Informal Economy into the Formal Economy
Economic & Energy Studies
BRICS Plus and Africa: Challenges and Mutual Gains
African Studies
Fifty Years On: The Realities of the October War (2)
Opinion
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Opinions Articles

Reviving Egypt’s Foreign Policy Circles

Dr. Muhammad Fayez Farahat
Last updated: 2023/03/07 at 1:02 PM
Dr. Muhammad Fayez Farahat
Share
8 Min Read
SHARE

Differentiating between the various circles within the foreign movement is something that those interested in the study of Egyptian foreign policy have gotten used to. Some divided these circles into three categories: the Arab circle, the African circle, and the international circle. Others made a distinction between the American and European circles and the Islamic world’s circle.

While this division has remained flexible, it has undergone a number of qualitative developments in recent years due to the nature of foreign policy, which is marked by a significant overlap between its circles and the presence of temporary geographical divisions.

The first of these changes is the revival of the major historical circles, including the Arab, African, American, and European ones. This revival was associated with the presence of long-standing Egyptian interests in these spheres and the increased activity of Egyptian diplomacy, particularly after Egypt gradually emerged from a state of retreating to its internal problems, a situation imposed by the fallout from the transformations of 2011 and 2013.

The second change was the revival or formation of new foreign policy circles of movement. In this context, we can speak of three fundamental circles: the Asian circle, which encompasses East, South, Southeast, Central Asia, and the Caucasus; the Eastern Mediterranean circle; and the Levant circle, which up until now has been centered on Egypt, Iraq, and Jordan. Although these circles are a part of larger, more established circles, such as the Arab, the international, or the Islamic world circles, the expansion of particular Egyptian interests in some sub-regions or the diversification of Egyptian foreign policy instruments in each of these sub-regions point to the necessity of making distinctions between the sub-circles of Egyptian foreign policy. As a result, it makes sense to separate the Levantine circle from the Arab circle and the circle of Central Asia and the Caucasus from the Asian circle. This distinction is more based on a clearer understanding of Egyptian interests in these new sub-circles rather than a conflict with the larger circles.

Several factors interacted to bring new life to, or establish entirely new circles within, the Egyptian foreign policy movement. The first of these factors is that Egypt’s political leadership and decision-makers have given careful thought to the nature of the shifts occurring in the structure of the global system and the current change in the international balance of power. This has led to an examination of the opportunities and risks associated with these shifts to ensure that Egypt will be a part of the new world order.

The second factor is how important the issue of development is to Egypt’s foreign policy priorities and goals. Without bringing up the topic of development as a crucial input, it is impossible to arrive at a comprehensive understanding of Egyptian foreign policy, including the formation of some circles of the external movement. In this context, what is remarkable is how clearly security and development concerns are intertwined in Egyptian foreign policy, particularly within the immediate geographic spheres.

The third factor is the complexity and diversity of Egyptian interests in the external world, which now include qualitatively new interests like entering the international energy markets as a new player and adjusting to the quick changes occurring in these markets. Egypt’s effort to export its know-how and surplus capabilities in areas like infrastructure development, the fight against terrorism, and other crucial expertise is one of these new interests.

The fourth factor is the rising relative importance of Egypt within the global system, a change that resulted from a number of comparative advantages that Egypt has managed to accumulate over the last eight years, starting with its groundbreaking experience in the field of the war on terrorism, to development experiences in the fields of energy and infrastructure, to the success of Egypt’s political leadership in engaging with international discussions on a wide range of topics, including international trade, energy, climate change, and global security, which prompted several countries to draw attention to these Egyptian experiences in order to benefit from them.

The shifting perception of Egypt from a traditional regional power to a middle power with a specific vision and expertise on a number of crucial issues in international politics has been significantly influenced by the increasing global dimension in Egyptian foreign discourse and its transcendence of direct regional issues. Egypt’s active participation in recent international forums and organizations, particularly the G20, the BRICS group, the Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia (CICA), the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, and its eagerness to represent the interests of various international groups (African economies, emerging economies, economies affected by wars and non-traditional threats like climate change, etc.), has helped to perpetuate this perception. Egypt’s new foreign discourse was also accompanied by successful practices, the most notable of which was the recent COP27 climate conference organization experience.

As a concept, foreign policy circles can be thought of as both geographical and functional. Important functional circles of foreign policy movement include global security, countering terrorism, exporting development capabilities, energy, climate change, and others, all of which present excellent opportunities for conflict and international cooperation. 

Foreign policy circles are also taking on interaction patterns that do not always match the pre-existing patterns of interaction between international actors at the level of movement circles in the geographical sense. They have also become a means for many of these actors to achieve international recognition.

Egypt has not only been successful in establishing functional foreign circles in addition to geographical foreign ones, but has also established new movement circles based on functional regions (the Eastern Mediterranean region, for example) in a clear fusion of external movement in the geographical and functional senses.

This article was originally published in Al-Ahram newspaper on 1 March 2023.

Related Posts

Dealing with Conflict in the Sahel

The Sudanese Refugee Crisis

The GERD Conundrum: Is a Solution in Sight?

A Race of Maneuvers in and Around China Seas

Dr. Muhammad Fayez Farahat March 7, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Crossing the Barriers: Serious Moves to Boost Egypt’s Tourism
Public Policy October 15, 2022
A Fresh Eye on the Sudanese Issue
Opinions Articles May 1, 2023
A Gradual Return: Dimensions of Al-Assad’s UAE Visit
International Relations April 12, 2022
Egypt .. The Future Starts Now
Publications June 15, 2020

Latest Tweets

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank, providing decisions-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was establised in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from diffrent generations and scientific desciplines. 

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2022

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?