By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Another obstacle on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam?
    June 5, 2020
    Varied paths of reform in Africa
    March 22, 2019
    G20 Membership Justified: Africa and the Road to the G20
    June 14, 2020
    Latest News
    2025 Yearender: Flood fallout
    January 20, 2026
    A Strategic reorientation: A critical reading of the 2025 US National Security Strategy
    January 18, 2026
    A diplomatic maneuver: Israel’s recognition of Somaliland
    January 17, 2026
    2025 Yearender: China’s multipolar world
    January 15, 2026
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    A Multi-dimensional Affair: Women and Terrorism in Africa
    June 14, 2020
    On deradicalisation: Marc Sageman and the psychology of jihadists
    June 22, 2020
    Assessing Deterrent Measures and the Prospects of War: US Military Movement in the Gulf to Confront Iran
    June 22, 2020
    Latest News
    Israel-Iran War: Does Israel Stand Alone?
    June 18, 2025
    Navigating Security and Diplomacy: What Russia’s Delisting of the Taliban Means for Bilateral Ties
    May 17, 2025
    Lakurawa: Armed Bandit Violence in Nigeria
    May 12, 2025
    Europe amid US–Iran Escalation: Can It Play the Diplomat or Become Entangled in the Crisis?
    April 13, 2025
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Sinai: A Strategy for Development amid Fighting Terrorism
    June 17, 2020
    Egypt’s Comprehensive Vision for Human Rights
    June 22, 2020
    The Right to Health in Egypt
    June 22, 2020
    Latest News
    Weaponization of Resources: The Role of Rare Earth Metals in the US-China Trade War
    May 25, 2025
    The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: A Catalyst or a Challenge for Egypt’s Export Ambitions?
    May 15, 2025
    The Suez Canal amidst Global Competition (3): National Strides Outpacing Time
    April 29, 2025
    Gaza’s Changing Demographics: The Toll of War and Blockade
    March 9, 2025
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Kyiv and the Great Winter Battle
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Book Review | The struggle for economic sovereignty: Who owns the instruments of power?
Readings
Displacement from Gaza: Deconstructing the idea, doctrine, and plan
Readings
The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies participates in the 57th Cairo International Book Fair for the sixth year
Readings
2025 Yearender: Flood fallout
Iranian Studies Palestinian & Israeli Studies
A Strategic reorientation: A critical reading of the 2025 US National Security Strategy
Palestinian & Israeli Studies
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Opinions Articles

Kyiv and the Great Winter Battle

Khaled Okasha
Last updated: 2023/01/05 at 5:33 PM
Khaled Okasha
Share
8 Min Read
SHARE

In a development that appeared to go against the flow of political interactions, Russia shocked Ukraine with an intense missile attack at dawn on Thursday on the capital, Kyiv, hours before the end of 2022. 

As daylight grew longer, it became apparent that the attack was broader than just Kyiv, leading observers to label it as one of the biggest bombing waves since the war began after it also hit Kharkiv, Odessa, Lviv, and Zhytomyr. Thursday’s airstrikes lasted approximately five hours. Ukrainian forces observed intense bursts of air and sea “cruise” missiles, totaling at least 70 missiles, as well as several drones directed at specific targets in Ukraine’s south.

That was a remarkable escalation on Russia’s part at a time when political debates were centering on the factors that might push parties to engage in a political settlement. Roughly contemporaneous with the raid, Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov made public remarks rejecting the “peace formula” proposed by Ukrainian President Zelensky as the basis for negotiations. Moscow believes Kyiv is not yet ready for serious peace talks. According to Russia, Kyiv’s plan to oust Moscow from eastern Ukraine and the Crimean peninsula as targets for Ukrainian military action supported by the West is nothing more than a huge “illusion”. Zelensky’s peace formula, outlined during his recent trip to Washington, centers on Moscow’s complete withdrawal from the Donbass region, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, and Crimea, its payment of compensation, and its recognition of international tribunals to which the leaders in the Kremlin will be subject.

Logically speaking, this is still an extremely high ceiling, even if we consider it a preliminary proposal to engage in a settlement that the involved parties, including primarily the West, are aware has not yet reached maturity.

Conversely, Moscow speaks of “today’s realities”, referring to the four regions that acceded to Russia following the referendums that were held last September. Furthermore, since the war’s inception, Moscow has made Ukrainian and international recognition of Russia’s final annexation of Crimea a requirement for ending military action. On top of that, Russia has also called for the Ukrainian constitution to be changed to include clauses prohibiting Ukraine from joining any military alliance, specifically NATO, and calling for a return to neutrality. This is extremely important to Moscow because it addresses a major justification for Russia to resort to military force. 

With such a wide gulf still separating them, the two sides still have a long way to go before they can even begin talks, and any diplomatic solution seems like a long shot at best right now. Worse, the crisis brings the idea of sovereignty into sharper focus, which will inevitably widen the gap between the two sides.

Both sides hope that their efforts on the battlefield will yield the benefits they desire and cover the high costs they have incurred since the war began. All bets are on the table, including the continuation of the conflict. Ukrainians have been constantly pressing the West to remember how crucial it is to prevent a Russian victory. Russia, on the other hand, is observing the escalating suffering in the West as a result of the war’s repercussions and is retaliating by making life as difficult as possible for the average European, who is a pliable target. Now, if Western support dwindles, sovereignty may perish. On the other hand, the referendum results may be thrown into the wind if Moscow guarantees US-European recognition of the annexation of Crimea, which they may eventually agree to at the end of the war to avoid its consequences. 

But it’s still unclear which side will be able to mastermind the design of the front lines and spheres of influence. In one way or another, all international parties are enmeshed in the current situation, and the United Nations has lost its ability to make decisions independently since the start of the conflict, at least in the eyes of Russia and other countries that are concerned with the final outcome.

The conflict in Ukraine could be on the verge of escalating into a major “winter battle” due to problems that have been brewing in the major European capitals for some time. Battlefields continue to be the only place where an impossible table can be set up. Russia will be forced to inflict even more pain and destruction on the Ukrainian people and their allies, which may explain the renewed focus on the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, and Odessa in particular. Kyiv has recently liberated some areas and made breakthroughs in others, but the resistance and counterattacks have not been enough to significantly alter the situation on the ground. Beyond these minor advances, Ukraine’s ambition is still limited to maintaining a feeble defense that may be vulnerable to missile intensification at any time, as what happened recently on Thursday. This is worrying because it exposes Kyiv, which has been largely secured, to attack. The attack on Thursday rendered 40 percent of Kyiv and 90 percent of Lviv without electricity. However, in order to prevent severe damage in the event that the Russian army was able to attack energy facilities, Odessa and Dnipropetrovsk resorted to voluntary cuts.

The majority of Thursday’s attack was carried out by Black Sea-based Russian ships and aircraft. Despite the information in his possession showing Moscow’s armament shortfall, Chief of the Defence Intelligence of Ukraine Kyrylo Budanov confirmed that Russia will continue to launch attacks on civilian infrastructure for as long as possible. According to reports from the United Kingdom, Russia is actively pursuing the acquisition of missile weapons from other countries. Whatever the veracity of these reports or the evidence supporting them, the great winter battle appears to have already begun.

Related Posts

Gaza Crisis between Israeli and American Perspectives

The End of Globalization?

Troubled Waters in Jenin Camp

Is It Time for the Arab Deal of the Century?

Khaled Okasha January 5, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print
Khaled Okasha
By Khaled Okasha
General Manager

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Lakurawa: Armed Bandit Violence in Nigeria
Terrorism & Armed Conflict May 12, 2025
Is It Time for the Arab Deal of the Century?
Opinions Articles November 13, 2024
Intertwining factors: The Significance of the MoU between the Syrian Democratic Council and the People’s Will Party
International Relations September 18, 2020
Alternative Approaches: Chad’s Regional Role amid Challenges of Political Transition
International Relations May 11, 2022

Latest Tweets

//

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank providing decision-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was established in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from different generations and scientific disciplines.

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

Who we are

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS) is an independent Egyptian think tank established in 2018. The Center adopts a national, scientific perspective in examining strategic issues and challenges at the local, regional, and international levels, particularly those related to Egypt’s national security and core national interests.

The Center’s output is geared toward addressing national priorities, offering anticipatory visions for policy and decision alternatives, and enhancing awareness of various transformations through diverse forms of scientific production and research activities.

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?