By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Another obstacle on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam?
    June 5, 2020
    Varied paths of reform in Africa
    March 22, 2019
    G20 Membership Justified: Africa and the Road to the G20
    June 14, 2020
    Latest News
    Power Play: Why Is Azerbaijan Setting Its Sights on the Horn of Africa?
    May 22, 2025
    Trump’s Gulf Tour: US Economic Gains and Reshaping the Geopolitical Landscape
    May 21, 2025
    The Future of the India-Pakistan Ceasefire
    May 19, 2025
    Trump’s Deal-Driven Approach: Priority Issues in His Middle East Visit
    May 14, 2025
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    A Multi-dimensional Affair: Women and Terrorism in Africa
    June 14, 2020
    On deradicalisation: Marc Sageman and the psychology of jihadists
    June 22, 2020
    Assessing Deterrent Measures and the Prospects of War: US Military Movement in the Gulf to Confront Iran
    June 22, 2020
    Latest News
    Navigating Security and Diplomacy: What Russia’s Delisting of the Taliban Means for Bilateral Ties
    May 17, 2025
    Lakurawa: Armed Bandit Violence in Nigeria
    May 12, 2025
    Europe amid US–Iran Escalation: Can It Play the Diplomat or Become Entangled in the Crisis?
    April 13, 2025
    Exploring Alternatives: What’s Next for Russia’s Military Influence in Syria?
    March 27, 2025
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Sinai: A Strategy for Development amid Fighting Terrorism
    June 17, 2020
    Egypt’s Comprehensive Vision for Human Rights
    June 22, 2020
    The Right to Health in Egypt
    June 22, 2020
    Latest News
    Weaponization of Resources: The Role of Rare Earth Metals in the US-China Trade War
    May 25, 2025
    The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: A Catalyst or a Challenge for Egypt’s Export Ambitions?
    May 15, 2025
    The Suez Canal amidst Global Competition (3): National Strides Outpacing Time
    April 29, 2025
    Gaza’s Changing Demographics: The Toll of War and Blockade
    March 9, 2025
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Economic Drain: The Gaza War and Israeli Gas Production
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Weaponization of Resources: The Role of Rare Earth Metals in the US-China Trade War
Economic & Energy Studies
Power Play: Why Is Azerbaijan Setting Its Sights on the Horn of Africa?
Asian Studies Others
Trump’s Gulf Tour: US Economic Gains and Reshaping the Geopolitical Landscape
Arab & Regional Studies
The Future of the India-Pakistan Ceasefire
Asian Studies
Navigating Security and Diplomacy: What Russia’s Delisting of the Taliban Means for Bilateral Ties
Terrorism & Armed Conflict
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Economic & Energy Studies

Economic Drain: The Gaza War and Israeli Gas Production

ahmed bayoumi
Last updated: 2023/11/20 at 8:28 PM
ahmed bayoumi
Share
13 Min Read
SHARE

In European natural gas futures contracts, gas prices increased by 14 percent, while global oil prices rose by 4 percent. These figures reflect the fear and uncertainty surrounding the conflict’s escalation. Regional issues have merged, and there is growing concern over Israel closing a sizable offshore platform within Gaza’s missile range, as well as Iran potentially entering the war zone and closing the Strait of Hormuz, which is the crossing point for one-third of the world’s seaborne oil.  

Following its attack on Gaza, the Israeli occupying force demanded that Chevron halt operations in the Tamar offshore field. Israel provided a justification for this request by asserting that it was safeguarding its energy production infrastructure against potential targeted attacks. While there are more substantial gas fields in Israel that have remained unaffected, the ground conflict targeting Gaza is anticipated to have far-reaching consequences.

Major Gas Discovery

In 1999, the Israeli occupation state granted permission to BG Group and three other Israeli companies, namely Mashav (15.6 percent), Dor Chemicals (7.2 percent), and Israel Petrochemical Enterprises (7.2 percent), to conduct initial deep-sea exploration activities. Mashav later left the partnership, and BG brought in STX, Isramco, Clal Industries, and Granit-Sonol, with the latter two leaving in 2004. Exploration studies and geological surveys persisted until 2007, when the Israeli government granted these companies an extension of the time limit for commencing drilling operations. The initial deadline was September 2003; however, it was subsequently postponed to December 2004, June 2005, and December 2008. Each of these extensions is deemed to have contravened the Israeli Petroleum Law, which stipulates that the total term of the license shall not exceed seven years from the date of the grant thereof.

In November of 2008, drilling operations commenced in the Tamar field. At that time, research suggested that gas constituted 35 percent of the composition of the field, and an economically feasible average output of 107 billion cubic meters was estimated.  Drilling was done down to 4,900 meters in the Tamar 1 field.  Drilling for the field cost roughly $92 million, and in July 2009, Tamar 2 was drilled as an appraisal well. The successful completion of this drilling operation led to an approximate 26 percent augmentation in the estimated reserves of the field. Following the drilling of four additional wells, Noble Energy commenced production development in September 2011, with an initial estimate of $3 billion for field development. However, field production did not commence until the conclusion of March 2013.

Figure 1: Field operations map for Tamar

https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/D_W-4xQBWB1uj_I2MXirqaUHNGiJG5k5cOr-xMxRWF9W2p9LMaQ-IN-1DYmidU0Tfd3xN9l0sO7--keahX3GmBXVjuojF0Grwwm2HKc8LHJ3n8BrCaNmmzzyZ_ucJp3WByGjzqteorcnib9gOH-RDWk

Production from the field is made via eight wells connected to an offshore gas processing platform in Askalan by a double subsea pipeline that spans 93 miles (150 km). This processing platform was built in Texas and delivered to Israel at the end of 2012. It took about a year and a half to construct, and at first it could deliver about 27.9 million cubic feet per year, or 10 billion cubic meters annually. The daily production capacity was elevated to 31 million cubic meters in 2015 through the installation of compressors at the Ashdod reception terminal, thereby augmenting the production capacities. The Tamar field produced approximately 10.25 billion cubic meters of gas in 2022.

The Tamar field contains approximately 320 billion cubic meters of reserves. Chevron has acquired Noble Energy, which produces gas in the Tamar and Leviathan fields and controls approximately 47 percent of the Tamar field with other partners including Isramco, which owns approximately 28.8 percent, and Tamar Oil, which owns 17.7 percent. Noble Energy still maintains control over approximately 85 percent of the Leviathan gas field.

The entity that holds the rights to utilize the Tamar field declared in May 2014 that it had signed a memorandum of understanding with Gas Natural Fenosa, a Spanish company that jointly owns an 80 percent liquefied gas export plant in Damietta with Eni, an Italian company, while the remaining 20 percent is split between Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation and Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Company. This was the first agreement reached between Egypt and Israel. Israel subsequently reached a similar accord with the Arab Potash Company in Jordan. Based on the terms of this agreement, Egypt was expected to receive an annual gas supply of approximately 4.5 billion cubic meters from the Tamar field for a duration of 15 years. This quantity corresponds to roughly half of the field’s total production, or 10.25 billion cubic meters per year. However, the actual gas supply to Egypt did not surpass 10 percent of the field’s overall output (1 billion cubic meters per year). The contractual agreement was valued at approximately $20 billion, or $1.3 billion per year, assuming Egypt receives a yearly supply of 4.5 billion cubic meters of gas via pipeline from the Tamar field to the Egyptian coast, a distance of 300 kilometers.

Prior to the war, the daily volume of Israeli exports to Egypt was approximately 23 million cubic meters (800 million cubic feet). According to media reports, the Israeli Ministry of Energy intends to augment its exports from the Tamar field to Egypt by 3.5 billion cubic meters per year for a period of eleven years, for a cumulative annual volume of 38.7 billion cubic meters (at present, 1 billion cubic meters are exported to Egypt, and Egypt can procure supplies amounting to approximately 4.5 billion cubic meters per year per the terms of the contract established between the two parties). This implies that Egypt may be able to get supplies at a rate of roughly 44 billion cubic meters per year for the remaining 11 years of the contract. Nevertheless, this remains dormant, as daily supplies have decreased by about 20 percent due to the Israeli invasion of Gaza, amounting to approximately 650 million cubic feet per day.

Economic Drain

Israel’s overall natural gas production amounted to approximately 22 billion cubic meters: the Leviathan field contributed 52 percent of this total with an estimated 11.4 billion cubic meters; the Tamar field contributed 47 percent with a production of approximately 10.2 billion cubic meters; and the Karsh field contributed the remaining 1 percent with an estimated 1 billion cubic meters. With an estimated domestic consumption of 12.7 billion cubic meters, Israel accounts for approximately 58 percent of the total production. The remaining gas, equivalent to 9.2 billion cubic meters, is exported to Egypt and Jordan, constituting an estimated 90 percent of the Tamar field’s output. The total value of gas exports in 2022 was around $2.3 billion. When compared to the total exports of Israel, which totaled 166 billion dollars in 2022, this amount appears to be low, representing approximately 1.4 percent of total exports this year. 

Table 1: Israel’s gas fields

FieldDiscovery DateStatusProduction Capacity
(Billion cubic meters)
Tamar2009Producing10,2
Leviathan2016Producing11,4
Karish2013Producing 
Tanin2012 Production set to begin in 2024
Shimshon2012 The production commencement date is yet unknown.
Dalit2009 The production commencement date is yet unknown.

This percentage may appear to be very low given the volume of Israeli exports, which is much higher. But given the 1.3 percent general budget deficit in 2023, or roughly $6 billion; the damage inflicted by the war on the tourism industry, which brings in about $3.1 billion for Israel; the suspension of international flights to Israel; Israel’s declaration of war; and the mobilization of roughly 360,000 reservists, we find that all of these factors paralyzed the joints of the Israeli economy as a whole and had a significant impact on production. This raises the possibility that the Israeli economy will experience an inflationary depression, a situation in which prices rise and supply falls as a result of production ceasing. This forces the state to try to recoup every dollar of its earnings and quickly put an end to the war in order to prevent these bad consequences. Add to this the military expenses of the conflict in Gaza, which the Hapoalim Bank projects will cost Israel roughly $6.8 billion, or 1.5 percent of its GDP.

Considering the aforementioned, as well as the size of the export market and Israel’s overall natural gas production, it seems improbable that the Gaza war will have a significant impact on the world’s oil and gas markets when considering Israel’s production capabilities. For instance, Egypt produces three times as much as Israel, with an annual production of 67 billion cubic meters.  Therefore, the effects on Egypt’s capacity to export gas from the Idku and Damietta stations—which rely on Israeli gas that is liquefied and then re-exported to the European market—may be minimal, given the reduction in the estimated one billion cubic meters of supplies to these stations, as Egypt and Israel have signed contracts to export these shipments to Egypt over the next 11 years. Still, if these shipments cannot be imported, then Cypriot gas from the Aphrodite field can fill the limited import space, especially since plans are in motion to build a pipeline that will link Aphrodite to the Egyptian liquefaction stations. As a result, we expect Israeli gas exports to have a limited impact on Egypt.

However, there is a risk that the conflict will escalate and attract more parties, disrupting navigation in the Strait of Hormuz or the Suez Canal or preventing Arab Gulf states, particularly Qatar, from delivering gas shipments to Europe. This would jeopardize the global energy market and raise the price of both oil and gas, especially since the war coincides with European efforts to replace Russian gas that has been cut off with alternatives from the Arabian Gulf and the Eastern Mediterranean.

Related Posts

Weaponization of Resources: The Role of Rare Earth Metals in the US-China Trade War

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: A Catalyst or a Challenge for Egypt’s Export Ambitions?

The Political Fallout of Climate Change: The Case of Greenland

The Power behind the Shift: How Critical Minerals Fuel the Global Energy Transition

ahmed bayoumi November 20, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print
ahmed bayoumi
By ahmed bayoumi
Deputy Head, Economic and Energy Studies Unit

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Arab Reform: Constructive Momentum
Opinion February 24, 2025
Lecture: “Humanitarian Economics in Protracted Conflicts”
Workshops May 11, 2021
Gaza’s Humanitarian Crisis:  Will the International Community Bear its Responsibility?
Palestinian & Israeli Studies October 21, 2023
Promoting Arab National Security: Egypt’s Doctrine and Vision
Arab & Regional Studies October 15, 2023

Latest Tweets

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?