By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Another obstacle on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam?
    June 5, 2020
    Varied paths of reform in Africa
    March 22, 2019
    G20 Membership Justified: Africa and the Road to the G20
    June 14, 2020
    Latest News
    Power Play: Why Is Azerbaijan Setting Its Sights on the Horn of Africa?
    May 22, 2025
    Trump’s Gulf Tour: US Economic Gains and Reshaping the Geopolitical Landscape
    May 21, 2025
    The Future of the India-Pakistan Ceasefire
    May 19, 2025
    Trump’s Deal-Driven Approach: Priority Issues in His Middle East Visit
    May 14, 2025
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    A Multi-dimensional Affair: Women and Terrorism in Africa
    June 14, 2020
    On deradicalisation: Marc Sageman and the psychology of jihadists
    June 22, 2020
    Assessing Deterrent Measures and the Prospects of War: US Military Movement in the Gulf to Confront Iran
    June 22, 2020
    Latest News
    Navigating Security and Diplomacy: What Russia’s Delisting of the Taliban Means for Bilateral Ties
    May 17, 2025
    Lakurawa: Armed Bandit Violence in Nigeria
    May 12, 2025
    Europe amid US–Iran Escalation: Can It Play the Diplomat or Become Entangled in the Crisis?
    April 13, 2025
    Exploring Alternatives: What’s Next for Russia’s Military Influence in Syria?
    March 27, 2025
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Sinai: A Strategy for Development amid Fighting Terrorism
    June 17, 2020
    Egypt’s Comprehensive Vision for Human Rights
    June 22, 2020
    The Right to Health in Egypt
    June 22, 2020
    Latest News
    Weaponization of Resources: The Role of Rare Earth Metals in the US-China Trade War
    May 25, 2025
    The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: A Catalyst or a Challenge for Egypt’s Export Ambitions?
    May 15, 2025
    The Suez Canal amidst Global Competition (3): National Strides Outpacing Time
    April 29, 2025
    Gaza’s Changing Demographics: The Toll of War and Blockade
    March 9, 2025
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Qualitative Armament: Will F-16 Change the Course of the Russia-Ukraine War?
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Weaponization of Resources: The Role of Rare Earth Metals in the US-China Trade War
Economic & Energy Studies
Power Play: Why Is Azerbaijan Setting Its Sights on the Horn of Africa?
Asian Studies Others
Trump’s Gulf Tour: US Economic Gains and Reshaping the Geopolitical Landscape
Arab & Regional Studies
The Future of the India-Pakistan Ceasefire
Asian Studies
Navigating Security and Diplomacy: What Russia’s Delisting of the Taliban Means for Bilateral Ties
Terrorism & Armed Conflict
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Analysis

Qualitative Armament: Will F-16 Change the Course of the Russia-Ukraine War?

Air Force Maj. Gen. Imad Abdel Mohsen Mansi
Last updated: 2023/06/27 at 12:50 PM
Air Force Maj. Gen. Imad Abdel Mohsen Mansi
Share
13 Min Read
SHARE

US President Joe Biden announced his willingness to allow other countries to supply Ukraine with US F-16 fighters and reaffirmed his support for a joint initiative aimed at training Ukrainian pilots on the fighter, signaling a significant shift in the level of Western military assistance for Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky hailed Biden’s announcement as “historic”.

Contents
Pilot Training and PreparationEstablishing a Fighter Pilot Base in UkraineTechnical ChallengesF-16’s Targeted Impact

The US step was also welcomed in Britain, where Prime Minister Richie Sunak said his country will cooperate with the United States, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Denmark to give Ukraine the combat air support it needs. He also called the US support for this broad initiative “welcome”.

Although it is currently unlikely that the United States will send fighters to Ukraine, it has permitted other countries to do so. Poland, which owns F-16s, has previously stated that it is prepared to provide Ukraine with them. The same is true for the Netherlands, which, like several NATO countries, has switched out its F-16 aircraft for the newest model, the F-35 aircraft.

It is remarkable that the quantity or timing of the aircraft’s delivery to Ukraine, the number of pilots who will receive training, or the variety of the aircraft’s armament—whether air-air or air-to-ground—have not been specified. Notably, the tasks that an aircraft will perform, their effectiveness and method of execution, as well as the equipment that the aircraft is equipped with, such as the type of radar, obstruction and electronic noise devices against potential ground and air hostilities, and self-protection systems against hostile missiles, are all largely determined by the armament of the aircraft.

Pilot Training and Preparation

Typically, pilots receive training through specialized programs that cover the following areas:

  • The theoretical study of aircraft systems (engine, flight control computer, aircraft auxiliary equipment, electrical systems, navigation systems, arming systems, and launcher systems)
  • Theoretical investigation of aircraft use: Factors influencing maneuvers and techniques for carrying out various acts. 
  • Dry training: This entails becoming accustomed to a sturdy cabin and the locations of various meters and switches.
  • Training on an aircraft simulator: A training that allows pilots to practice many different maneuvers and procedures.
  • Practical Training:
  • Air-to-Air Training 
  • Air-to-Ground Training 
  • Consolidation of Skills
  • Combat Preparation 

Establishing a Fighter Pilot Base in Ukraine

It is crucial to keep in mind that there are a number of steps that must be taken to train fighter pilots on the aircraft when they have little to no prior experience with the model in order to build up a base of Ukrainian pilots. Overall, this phase could be cut short, but doing so would expose a serious flaw in the quality of pilot training, which would affect the aircraft’s ability to be used in combat and the certainty of the outcomes.

The F-16 is a modern fighter, like the majority of fourth-generation fighters, with complex and advanced electronic systems, and it requires pilots with knowledge of modern technology, which Ukrainian pilots do not possess because their prior experience is limited to aircraft like the MIG-29, SU-25, and SU-27, which do not have modern technology. This lengthens the time it takes them to learn how to operate the F-16, and the shorter amount of training time may have an impact on how well they can use the aircraft’s systems and devices, including its armament.

Typically, a small number of pilots are trained, and once they complete the program, they are trained to apply on the aircraft upon their return to their country (2-3 months), and the process is repeated to teach other new pilots during the war. 

In this context, it should be noted that the global average ratio of pilots to aircraft is approximately 2-3:1, or approximately 2-3 pilots per aircraft. Given the make-up of Fighter Squadron 24, this implies that one squadron needs to train between 48 and 72 pilots. In order for the F-16 to have a significant impact on the course of the Russian-Ukrainian war, the Ukrainian Air Force must be supplied with 6-8 squadrons. This provides a general idea of the timeframes and aircraft required for an effective intervention in the war.

An analysis of the skills of Ukrainian pilots by the US Air National Guard revealed that they could be trained to operate the aircraft in as little as four months. However, according to experts, it may take additional months to transform these pilots into combat-ready pilots who can fully utilize the aircraft’s features. A former F-16 pilot stated, “If Ukrainians are not thoroughly trained in Western tactics, they will not realize any of the benefits of having a true four-plus generation aircraft,” adding, “If you take an F-16 and fly it like a MiG-29, you will just have a hotrod MiG-29, and that is it.” Nevertheless, the time required is likely to be significantly less than the 18-month timeline the Pentagon had previously cited as the quickest possible.

Therefore, in order for the pilot to be able to conduct operational missions (air-air or air-ground), a certain number of flight hours (150-200 flight hours) must be completed for training in the implementation of air engagements, whether long-range (beyond-visual-range) within distances of up to 100 kilometers, or air combat within the visual range (dogfight), as well as training in the throwing of bombs and air-ground missiles, using training and operational ammunition. Technical crews are trained alongside pilots, but the process takes much longer. As a result, it is expected that foreign technicians will work alongside Ukrainian technicians once the operation reaches the necessary technical levels, which could take several years.

Technical Challenges

The F-16 may be associated with a number of potential technical issues that include the following:

  • According to Global Firepower, the number of aircraft operated by Ukrainian forces is 187, of which 41 are combat MIG-SU and auxiliary aircraft. This is ten times less than the number of aircraft operated by Russia.  Kiev does not have complete control over its airspace, but its numerous anti-aircraft defense systems prevent Russian fighter jets from operating beyond the front line. 
  • The US government stated that sending the F-16s to Ukraine is contingent upon ensuring that they are not used against Russia or are not intended to be used to attack targets inside Russia. This is due to a number of factors, including not allowing the Russian air defense to implement strategies to detect the aircraft by radar, deal with it, shoot it down inside Russian territory, deal with it, dismantle it, and analyze the modern devices already present in it.
  • In Ukraine, there are numerous air defense systems, including (eastern) Russian and western air defense systems.  During operations, F-16 flights must be secured, but it is impossible to secure them using identification devices for the two systems, limiting the use of the aircraft in the airspace where eastern air defense systems are in operation.
  • Technical security is one of the most challenging potential challenges for the F-16, with more than 100,000 spare parts, which requires preparing appropriate stores. If supply comes from a neighboring European country, it is necessary to calculate the amount of time needed for the supply method.
  • Transitioning a state’s armed forces to use weapons that are fundamentally different from their basic systems takes a long time even in times of peace; doing so while at war is extremely difficult because there is no place to hide from air, artillery, or cruise missiles.
  • Russia has recently concentrated on attacking Ukrainian airports. It has not disclosed the types of targets that have been destroyed, but it can be assumed that these targets include all locations that can be used for technical support, storage of spare parts, and facilities for F-16 aircraft maintenance.

F-16’s Targeted Impact

US Army Chief of Staff Mark Milley has stated that the F-16 fighters that the United States has promised to provide Ukraine are not a “magic weapon” that will end the conflict in the country. This happened following a gathering of the international Ukraine Defense Contact Group, which organizes the delivery of arms to Ukraine.

Milley added that “There’s no magic weapons in war. And sometimes certain things get labeled as you know, this is gonna be the magic weapon. There are no magic weapons, and the F-16 is not – neither is anything else.” However, if there are a lot of planes, they will undoubtedly be a magical solution. The kind of arming the planes will be sent with could also be a deciding factor.  The US message might be based on the few planes that will be sent and the meager effectiveness of the weapons they will carry.

Overall, providing Ukraine with F-16s is primarily media propaganda against Russia and a sign of the West’s willingness to support Ukraine, more so in order to boost Ukraine’s morale than to provide weapons that will have an impact on how operations are carried out. Notably, the United States will not pay for the planes nor send them from its factories.

Furthermore, the announcement of the F-16 supply to Ukraine is perhaps intended to drain Western countries and push them deeper into the realm of extreme hostility toward Russia (as European countries will be providing Ukraine with aircraft), and to ensure the challenge of reestablishing political and economic relations, especially with Russia, in the near future, not to mention draining Russia’s economy, delaying President Vladimir Putin’s initiative to rehabilitate Russia’s international standing, and weakening the new Chinese-Russian alliance, which is crucial to establishing the new global order.

Related Posts

Gaza Crisis between Israeli and American Perspectives

Sudan Matters, Always

How the Echoes of the Russia-Ukraine War Reshaped the Black Sea Region

The End of Globalization?

TAGGED: F-16, Russia, Ukraine
Air Force Maj. Gen. Imad Abdel Mohsen Mansi June 27, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print
Air Force Maj. Gen. Imad Abdel Mohsen Mansi
By Air Force Maj. Gen. Imad Abdel Mohsen Mansi
Former Director of the Air Force College Advisor to the Nasser Military Academy for Postgraduate Studies

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Reasons and Ramifications of Al-Shabaab’s Retreat from its Positions
Defense & Security January 30, 2023
The Ninth Summit of Organization of Turkic States: Context and Motives
International Relations November 27, 2022
How the Echoes of the Russia-Ukraine War Reshaped the Black Sea Region
European Studies May 8, 2025
G20 Membership Justified: Africa and the Road to the G20
International Relations June 14, 2020

Latest Tweets

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?