By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Egypt-France relations: Consensus and strategic partnership
    December 12, 2020
    Beyond Tigray: Wielding Hunger as a Weapon in Ethiopia’s Civil War
    August 22, 2021
    Cautious Trepidation: The International and Regional Response to the Ethiopian Crisis
    February 9, 2022
    Latest News
    Deteriorating Security Crises: Renewed Risks of Civil War in Darfur
    June 10, 2023
    Iran-Mauritania Rapprochement: Motives and Objectives
    June 6, 2023
    The Political Aspects of France’s Crisis
    June 4, 2023
    The UNITAMS Role and the Position of Sudanese Parties 
    June 3, 2023
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    A Habitual Trend: Terrorist Organizations’ Exploitation of Natural Disasters
    March 25, 2023
    Why isn’t the Yemen war drawing to a close?
    March 27, 2021
    Israel’s Cyber ​​Dome: Hallmarks and Motives
    Israel’s Cyber ​​Dome: Hallmarks and Motives
    August 15, 2022
    Latest News
    Why Have TikTok Security Concerns Grown Globally?
    April 16, 2023
    Employing Loopholes: Escalating Pakistani Taliban Activity and its Repercussions
    April 1, 2023
    A Habitual Trend: Terrorist Organizations’ Exploitation of Natural Disasters
    March 25, 2023
    ChatGPT: Promising Applications, Potential Difficulties
    March 6, 2023
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Unprecedented Revival: Egypt’s Becomes Self-Sufficient in Natural Gas
    August 29, 2021
    A Comprehensive Vision: The Cultural and Touristic Dimensions of Developing Muhammad Ali’s Gunpowder Magazine
    A Comprehensive Vision: The Cultural and Touristic Dimensions of Developing Muhammad Ali’s Gunpowder Magazine
    June 21, 2022
    Effective Policies: Managing Inflation in Egypt in 2021
    February 8, 2022
    Latest News
    Boosting Presence: The Economic Implications of Iranian President’s Visit to Syria
    May 27, 2023
    Scenarios for Energy Crisis Management in the European Union
    May 20, 2023
    Reading into Egypt’s Foreign Debt
    May 13, 2023
    Development Trends in Sinai
    May 2, 2023
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Library
    • Books
    • Digital Editions
    • Periodicals
    • Special Editions
  • العربية
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Russia’s Position in the Syrian-Turkish Settlement
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Deteriorating Security Crises: Renewed Risks of Civil War in Darfur
African Studies Others
Tunnels of Religious War in Palestine
Opinion
Iran-Mauritania Rapprochement: Motives and Objectives
European Studies
The Political Aspects of France’s Crisis
European Studies
The UNITAMS Role and the Position of Sudanese Parties 
African Studies
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Opinions Articles

Russia’s Position in the Syrian-Turkish Settlement

Khaled Okasha
Last updated: 2023/04/04 at 12:56 PM
Khaled Okasha
Share
9 Min Read
SHARE

The deputy foreign ministers of Russia, Turkey, Syria, and Iran have agreed to meet in Moscow in April. According to the Russian Foreign Ministry, the quadripartite consultations should focus on one main topic: preparations for a ministerial meeting, which will be planned for a date no later than the upcoming weeks. 

By taking this route, Russia hopes to eventually bring together the leaders of Syria and Turkey, ending the estrangement that has existed between the two countries since 2011, and starting the process of normalizing relations between Ankara and Damascus.

Through diplomatic mediation, Russia seeks to resolve the hurdles between the two capitals in the most complicated hotbed of international conflict. The picture appears to be a little further removed from the reality of achieving a specific outcome, particularly given the prolonging of the crisis, the number of state and non-state actors involved, and the sheer number of banners and flags flying over the conflict. 

For instance, one of the banners that retains its historical name is the International Coalition to combat the Islamic State (IS), which is the umbrella under which US forces are barricaded on Syrian soil, along with the symbolic participation of Western countries. In addition, non-state actors in Syria come in a wide variety, and even if we were to begin listing their names, levels of subordination, numbers of armed members, and so on, we would not come close to exhausting the category.

Russian mediation, which is presented as novel, recalls the Astana Format on Syria, in which Russia, Turkey, and Iran are guarantor states, and whose 19th round produced only rhetorical wiggle room and nothing new over the course of its previous rounds, which spanned the five-year duration of the crisis, except for some discussion about the sovereignty of the current regime over all lands and the integrity of the Syrian territories, as well as an affirmation—which remained the most crucial—of continued involvement in seizing control of Syria’s future without allowing others to cross the line into this hazy future.

Politics is often referred to as “the art of the possible”, but it is not possible that the three countries would acknowledge or comprehend their shared responsibility for the Syrian crisis. There isn’t enough room to go into detail about how these countries contribute to the crisis both individually and collectively. Instead, we could cut this short by speculating as to what Russia has up its sleeve this time, especially given that the only novel development is allowing Syria to attend these conferences after 19 rounds of enforced disappearance and changing the banner’s name from “The Future of Syria” to something more in vogue in the region in order to become a Russian “mediation” that pushes for normalization between Syria and Turkey.

It is possible to provide explanations for the Russian algorithms and the degree to which the other three parties see themselves in Moscow’s plans, at least in terms of what might actually be a significant advancement on the elusive settlement path. Acting from a position of diplomatic isolation, Russia is attempting to give the impression that it has options on issues beyond the impasse in Ukraine. 

At the same time, Moscow needs to keep exceptional relations with Ankara in order to manage the war in Ukraine and its consequences. After President Erdogan succeeded in forging a position that advances Russian interests, Ankara has grown in significance, and Moscow cannot in any way sever its ties with Turkey. Moscow’s new mediation proposal is taking steps in the direction of safeguarding and strengthening this relationship by putting its weight behind the Turkish president in the upcoming elections.

Normalizing relations between Ankara and Damascus could provide Erdogan with answers to problems that might surface during the election campaign, and he now needs “horizons” that may succeed or either catch up with its forerunners. In any case, this would give Erdogan room to promote these achievements domestically and to present them to the Turkish electorate as being for the first time being discussed and formed at a table that also includes Russia, Iran, and Damascus, all of which are weights that support Erdogan with regard to important security, economic, and political issues.

The burden of Syrian refugees, the fortification of Turkey’s southern borders in exchange for a guarantee from Syria of a Turkish withdrawal that modifies the formula of the direct Turkish occupation of parts of northern and northwest Syria, as well as discussing the status of Turkish-backed armed groups that the Syrian government labels as “terrorist”, are among the pressing issues before the Turkish president. 

The previous security talks between Turkish and Syrian officials failed to produce a consensus on the hot-button issues or even a foundation upon which to build a plan that would allow the move to the political level. This is precisely what Russia’s mediation proposal is meant to achieve at this time. 

As soon as Moscow got wind of Ankara’s willingness to establish a timeline for the withdrawal of Turkish forces from Syrian territory, it began to consider the possibility of discussing corresponding guarantees that Damascus would give to Ankara concerning the security of the Turkish borders and the control of any potential waves of refugees into Turkish territory. 

If Moscow can complete the formula quickly and guarantee that any potential roadblocks on both sides will be overcome, it will allow it to regain diplomatic clout. According to Russian sources, President Putin gave this mediation his full support when he met with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in Moscow recently and seemed as if investing in the aid he has given Syria over the years. The Kremlin has made this point clear, stating prominently in the introduction to its statements about the visit that the meeting between the Russian president and his Syrian counterpart will undoubtedly have a positive effect on relations between Turkey and Syria.

Moscow is moving with its sights set on the success of Chinese mediation between Saudi Arabia and Iran, hoping to make progress on the same geopolitical weight that strongly supports it and demonstrates Moscow’s ability to support and provide solutions to its friends at this crucial moment. 

On the opposite side, there are the United States and the Kurds in the same northern region, which is the subject of the discussion. Will they approve a deal of this nature, given that they both possess military might and have effective control over the ground and other stakeholders?

This article was originally published in Arabic on 1 April 2023 in Al-Ahram.

Related Posts

African Peace Initiative to End Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Drones and the Kremlin Bring Back Excitement to the Ukraine War

A Fresh Eye on the Sudanese Issue

The Israeli Question – Again

TAGGED: Syrian-Turkish Settlement
Khaled Okasha April 4, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print
Khaled Okasha
By Khaled Okasha
General Manager

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

A Comprehensive Vision: The Cultural and Touristic Dimensions of Developing Muhammad Ali’s Gunpowder Magazine
A Comprehensive Vision: The Cultural and Touristic Dimensions of Developing Muhammad Ali’s Gunpowder Magazine
Public Policy June 21, 2022
Ankara’s Losing Hand in Libya
International Relations October 3, 2020
From Defense to Attack: Conflict shifts from Tigray to Amhara
International Relations August 7, 2021
Following Israel’s Freezing of Judicial Reform
Arab & Regional Studies April 19, 2023

Latest Tweets

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank, providing decisions-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was establised in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from diffrent generations and scientific desciplines. 

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2022

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?