By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Varied paths of reform in Africa
    March 22, 2019
    Two years on Stockholm: Yemen between comprehensive settlement and conflict management
    December 31, 2020
    A Test of Strength: The Relationship between the Iraqi state and the Popular Mobilization Forces Following Qasim Muslih’s Release
    August 26, 2021
    Latest News
    Ethiopia’s 2026 elections: Procedural modernization and the limits of political inclusiveness
    June 20, 2026
    A historic role: Egypt and the Palestinian cause since 1948
    May 23, 2026
    Employing maritime corridors in conflicts: Lessons learned
    May 20, 2026
    Israel’s security and economic conundrum:How does Israel confront the challenges of a protracted war with Iran?
    May 2, 2026
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    On deradicalisation: Marc Sageman and the psychology of jihadists
    June 22, 2020
    Israel’s Multiple Objectives to Attack Rafah
    February 19, 2024
    Where Does Daesh Stand in Syria’s Current Escalation?
    December 7, 2024
    Latest News
    Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
    April 15, 2026
    Encrypted messages “Roaring Lion”: The hidden messages behind the name of the operation against Iran
    March 11, 2026
    Iran war developments
    March 9, 2026
    Manufacturing the enemy : Reframing terrorism in contemporary Western discourse
    March 7, 2026
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Egypt’s Comprehensive Vision for Human Rights
    June 22, 2020
    Sustaining Momentum: Egypt’s Strategy to Boost Water Security
    September 9, 2021
    The Dark Side: The Impact of Climate Change on Women
    July 7, 2022
    Latest News
    US trade policy in 2026: International moves and strategic implications
    May 25, 2026
    Analysis| Egypt economic path and IMF negotiations amid escalating regional energy crisis
    May 11, 2026
    From global shock to Egypt’s economy: Analyzing the impact of the Iran war on energy security
    May 3, 2026
    Egypt as a balancing power: Why Cairo rejects the logic of wars in the Middle East
    April 30, 2026
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Fifty Years On: The Realities of the October War (3)
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Ethiopia’s 2026 elections: Procedural modernization and the limits of political inclusiveness
African Studies
US trade policy in 2026: International moves and strategic implications
Economic & Energy Studies
Scenarios for shaping international and regional influence in the Middle East after the war
Opinions Articles
A historic role: Egypt and the Palestinian cause since 1948
Palestinian & Israeli Studies
Employing maritime corridors in conflicts: Lessons learned
Arab & Regional Studies
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Opinion

Fifty Years On: The Realities of the October War (3)

Khaled Okasha
Last updated: 2023/10/01 at 4:11 PM
Khaled Okasha
Share
7 Min Read
SHARE

After the conclusion of their meeting at noon on 12 October 1973, some of the attendees remained with Israeli prime minister Golda Meir and the Israeli minister of defence to discuss the situation assessments and debate the decisions that had caused disagreement.

Suddenly, sirens blared across Tel Aviv, signalling the start of the Egyptian-Syrian offensive at two minutes past two in the afternoon. Hours before this scene unfolded in Tel Aviv, General Samuel Gonen, commander of the Israeli Southern Command, had moved towards the Command Centre after receiving intelligence reports confirming that the Egyptian crossing of the Suez Canal would begin at 6:00 pm. Upon his arrival, he contacted General Abraham Mendler, commander of the Israeli armed forces in Sinai, to receive the latest information.

During this call, Gonen told Mendler that “it’s better to move the armoured divisions forward towards the front line, and by evening they should be in place.” Mendler replied that “it’s time [to do so] indeed; they are shelling me.” Gonen ended the call, and the attack began.

In the Israeli account of these events, titled “The Shortcoming,” what took place in the Israeli operations room that day are documented in the chapter called “The Black Day of Atonement.” Israeli chief of staff David Eliezer and deputy chief of staff Israel Tal rushed to the room and requested to see maps indicating the enemy’s movements and points of attack.

However, during those dramatic moments, a surprise occurred. No one could even draw the relevant arrows on the maps as the war was escalating so dramatically. Reports came in from Israeli fortified positions that Egyptian forces were crossing the canal and that soldiers and armoured vehicles were moving to Sinai together with hundreds of fibreglass boats.

From their crossing points on the western side of the canal, Egyptian battlegroups began sending armoured vehicles on floats eastwards. “The Shortcoming” describes the attack on the Israeli Bar Lev Line designed to fortify the eastern side of the canal based on the testimonies of Israeli soldiers at the time, all of whom expressed shock and astonishment at what was happening.

This part of the book concludes that “the first moments of the Day of Atonement War surprised the Bar Lev Line and its fighters completely. Despite the intermittent reports received from their leadership about the imminent danger and their orders to ‘absorb the first strike,’ the entire line was taken by complete surprise.”

When it became clear as a result of the intense shelling of the fortified line that the Egyptians had started crossing the canal and moving military units deep into Sinai, Israeli tanks were sent to the front lines to reinforce them and occupy firing positions along the canal. Here, another surprise awaited them, beyond the surprise of the war itself.

The Israeli tanks could not get close to the waterline. Many of them were hit when they were still a few hundred metres away from the earthen barrier along the canal, with many of them also not knowing what had hit them. Later, they realised that they had been hit by rockets fired from Egyptian missile bases west of the canal that had launched hundreds of the new “Sagger” anti-tank missiles at the Israeli tanks.

Shortly afterwards, the same missiles were launched from the east side of the canal, where tens of thousands of Egyptian soldiers had now crossed.

The Israeli tank crews were not prepared, and they lacked guidance systems. The soldiers inside the tanks were astounded, with one of them remarking, according to “The Shortcoming,” that “this felt like suicide.”

Baruch Shemir (Barry), a soldier in an Israeli armoured unit in the 1973 War, later recounted vivid details of the fierce combat between the two armies. Leave was cancelled for all the soldiers in Barry’s unit two days before the war began, and it was then deployed in the middle sector of the canal seven km from the waterline.

Most of the Israeli armoured units in Sinai were positioned in their training areas in the second line, and now they were tasked with reaching the waterline at designated crossing areas to prevent the establishment of bridgeheads or to obstruct the initial Egyptian advance.

Barry had served in the armoured unit for a year-and-a-half and worked as an ammunition loader in the commander’s tank. His tank stopped 400 metres from a small lake adjacent to the canal parallel to the waterline. Then it began firing. The tank crew relaxed when they saw that their targets were “infantrymen” and not Egyptian armoured vehicles. This realisation came as a relief, with Barry commenting that “for us, the tanks were the main problem – the enemy’s tanks (the first target), followed by anti-tank guns (the second target), and only then would we open fire on infantry.”

 “But within a quarter of an hour, the commander’s tank had changed positions three times. I didn’t realise what was happening. We saw that the targets facing us were ‘infantrymen’ and not the Egyptian tanks we had never seen before. The other tanks in the platoon had no better luck. When we looked out from behind the sand hills, we saw flames. Those were the tanks of the platoon.”

Related Posts

Scenarios for shaping international and regional influence in the Middle East after the war

A historic role: Egypt and the Palestinian cause since 1948

Egypt as a balancing power: Why Cairo rejects the logic of wars in the Middle East

Reshaping the US position toward Israel: From the erosion of the old consensus to a new conflict across parties, state, and society

TAGGED: Egypt, Israel, October War
Khaled Okasha October 1, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print
Khaled Okasha
By Khaled Okasha
General Manager

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Libya: Intractable tensions
International Relations September 3, 2020
The Will to Return: Implications of the Recrudescence of IS’ Qualitative Operations
Analysis February 7, 2022
Another war
Others April 4, 2026
Talibanistan or Civil War: Scenarios for the Afghanistan Crisis
International Relations August 30, 2021

Latest Tweets

//

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank providing decision-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was established in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from different generations and scientific disciplines.

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

Who we are

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS) is an independent Egyptian think tank established in 2018. The Center adopts a national, scientific perspective in examining strategic issues and challenges at the local, regional, and international levels, particularly those related to Egypt’s national security and core national interests.

The Center’s output is geared toward addressing national priorities, offering anticipatory visions for policy and decision alternatives, and enhancing awareness of various transformations through diverse forms of scientific production and research activities.

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?