By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Egypt, Ethiopia Discord over the Nile
    June 15, 2020
    United Kingdom: The Muslim Brotherhood’s European Stronghold
    February 18, 2021
    Egypt, Israel, and natural gas
    September 19, 2021
    Latest News
    Reshaping the US position toward Israel: From the erosion of the old consensus to a new conflict across parties, state, and society
    April 23, 2026
    Israel’s African gambit
    March 6, 2026
    Geopolitical realism: What does Washington’s return to the African Sahel mean?
    March 5, 2026
    Analysis | Manufacturing opposition: How Israel uses digital platforms to shape Iranian public opinion
    February 14, 2026
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    War in Yemen: Iran’s changing tactics
    December 12, 2020
    From Damascus to Sana’a: Israel’s Anti-Houthi Strategy after Assad’s Fall
    January 14, 2025
    Encrypted messages “Roaring Lion”: The hidden messages behind the name of the operation against Iran
    March 11, 2026
    Latest News
    Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
    April 15, 2026
    Encrypted messages “Roaring Lion”: The hidden messages behind the name of the operation against Iran
    March 11, 2026
    Iran war developments
    March 9, 2026
    Manufacturing the enemy : Reframing terrorism in contemporary Western discourse
    March 7, 2026
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Egypt’s Diplomacy of Humanitarian Aid
    September 27, 2020
    Universal Health Insurance: Challenges and Aspirations
    October 12, 2021
    Pre-emptive Education and Protection towards a Violence-Free Childhood
    September 27, 2022
    Latest News
    Egypt as a balancing power: Why Cairo rejects the logic of wars in the Middle East
    April 30, 2026
    Militarizing water in Middle East wars A strategic analysis of the Iran-US-Israel war
    April 18, 2026
    Reading into attacks on maritime navigation in the Arabian Gulf
    March 17, 2026
    Emerging economies in a world without rules: Between opportunity and predicament
    March 5, 2026
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Regional Motion: Sudanese Civil Forces Seek Accord in Ethiopia
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Egypt as a balancing power: Why Cairo rejects the logic of wars in the Middle East
Media Studies
Reshaping the US position toward Israel: From the erosion of the old consensus to a new conflict across parties, state, and society
American Studies
Militarizing water in Middle East wars A strategic analysis of the Iran-US-Israel war
Economic & Energy Studies
The future of US-Iran negotiations
Opinion
Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
Terrorism & Armed Conflict
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
African Studies

Regional Motion: Sudanese Civil Forces Seek Accord in Ethiopia

Shaimaa Al-Baksh
Last updated: 2023/08/23 at 1:29 PM
Shaimaa Al-Baksh  - Senior Researcher at the Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS)
Share
10 Min Read
SHARE

After a period of silence regarding the country’s ongoing war that erupted last April, Sudanese civil forces have recently sought to play a constructive role in the crisis and are looking for ways to put an end to the fighting and shape the future of the country. The first of these efforts is the search for the unification of the civil front, particularly in light of the fact that the current conflict was fueled by the polarization and division of the civil forces prior to the outbreak of the conflict.

Contents
Regional MotionGoals for the Future

The civil forces seek to establish new channels of communication with all parties, as well as regional and international powers, in light of the significant role that mediators can play in the country’s future political settlement. The ultimate goal is to ensure they remain an active participant at the post-conflict negotiating table after the exclusion of the civil party in favor of the warring military parties, although the civil component supposed to set their expectations and guidelines for a political settlement following the conflict.

Regional Motion

The Sudanese Revolutionary Front (SRF) and the delegation of the Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC), which signed the Political Framework Agreement (PFA), met on 14 August in Addis Ababa to discuss war-related issues and their effects, as well as to find ways to unify the civil front in order to push for a return to the negotiating table. The meetings in Addis Ababa were held under the banner of “Ending the War”, and according to FFC spokesman, Jaafar Hassan, the humanitarian issue and securing humanitarian corridors are at the forefront of the discussions, in addition to bringing the civil front together to talk about issues in post-war Sudan. 

During the Addis Ababa meeting, Al-Hadi Idris, the head of the SRF, stressed the necessity of unifying the civil front and noted that while civil forces had previously met in Egypt, Kenya, and Uganda to discuss a variety of topics, the Ethiopian gathering had a particular focus on humanitarian issues. The PFA signatories’ meeting in Ethiopia is part of a broader effort by civil forces to reach an agreement, deal with humanitarian concerns, end the war, and finally address historical grievances and begin rebuilding the country.

Prior to the meeting, a delegation from the FFC-Democratic Bloc traveled to Addis Ababa on 18 August, where they met with IGAD members, African Union officials, and some foreign ambassadors to discuss the realignment of civil forces and the need to find a solution to the crisis. As part of the efforts to bring the factions of the FFC closer together and find common ground, a delegation from the FFC-Democratic Bloc was present in Egypt at the same time as a delegation from the FFC-Central Council.

This meeting follows the FFC’s regional tour, which started on 3 July and included South Sudan, Chad, Saudi Arabia, and Cairo. The tour started in Uganda, where they met with the country’s president, who reaffirmed Uganda’s willingness to mediate the crisis in search of a resolution. The delegation was then split up into teams, some of which traveled to Saudi Arabia, others to Kenya, South Sudan, and Chad, until they arrived at the Cairo station on 24-25 July. Following this trip, the FFC delegation left for Brussels on 27 July at the invitation of the European Union Commission to discuss means of putting an end to the conflict, establishing peace and democratization in the country, and stepping up efforts to address the humanitarian crisis. 

There was a similar internal motion to unite the civil forces across all of their spectrums, as evidenced by the announcement of a Declaration of Principles for the SRV and FFC with the support of 75 civil society organizations and civil parties with the aim of establishing an executive transitional authority. However, at a pan-eastern Sudan conference, Mubarak Al-Fadil, the leader of the National Umma Party, urged the political forces to band together, come up with a plan for getting back on the political track, and establish a government of national unity that would carry out an economic plan to boost production, reconstruction, and services.

This motion was preceded by the announcement of the East’s Initiative to bring about peace and unify postwar visions on matters like reconstruction and damage compensation. Numerous political parties, civil administrations, and community leaders participated in this initiative. Under the banner “The unity of the Sudanese ranks—the independence of the national decision”, Nazir Muhammad Al-Amin Tirik, Head of the Hadendowa Beja clan and Chairman of the Beja Nazirs Council, announced a forum to unify ranks in Arkawit, eastern Sudan, in the first week of September. The forum will bring together political and societal forces, religious organizations, and armed struggle movements.

Goals for the Future

The civil forces’ entire effort is directed at getting involved in and contributing to the ongoing conflict in the country. Their main goals are to stop the fighting, promote the distribution of humanitarian aid, discuss the conditions and ideals of peace, and then work to ensure the signing of a comprehensive peace agreement after the PFA was unable to unify the ranks.

At the Jeddah talks, efforts to include civilians in the peace process emerged after failure to compel the warring parties to uphold the terms of the Jeddah Declaration of Commitment to Protect the Civilians of Sudan. In order to prevent the military forces from controlling all decision-making and isolating the forces that dominate the field in post-war trends, US voices emphasized the need to broaden the Declaration and include the civil forces in a post-war comprehensive political agreement.

As a result, the civil forces started to mobilize their forces and conduct their foreign diplomatic tours in an effort to rally the powerful regional powers that have the ability to sponsor negotiations, lift the veil of secrecy that has covered the scene since the start of the conflict, and reveal their position on what is happening in the country by outlining their vision and providing an explanation of the events in the regional tours.

The civil forces are also making an effort to coordinate their efforts and end the division. In order to achieve this, it has been suggested that the PFA be reexamined as a reference in order to broaden its scope and include forces that were previously left out, whose exclusion widened the gulfs and paved the way for the ongoing military conflict.

At its meeting in Cairo at the end of July, the FFC-Central Council pledged to be open to all civil forces, put more effort into organizing meetings, and establish channels of communication with various civil forces that did not take part in the PFA, particularly the FFC-Democratic Bloc, which opens the door for civil forces to exert pressure and make their voices heard in the coming period.

The FFC’s targeting of regional powers is motivated by their belief in the mediators’ capacity to influence the specifics of the future negotiating position as well as their concern that the civil forces may be overshadowed by the loud voices of the warring parties, given the ongoing efforts of the regional neighbors to develop a thorough negotiation process that includes all parties involved.

Related Posts

Geopolitical realism: What does Washington’s return to the African Sahel mean?

Xeer Ciise: Clan Tensions in Western Somaliland | Analysis

A diplomatic maneuver: Israel’s recognition of Somaliland

Gearing up for Somalia’s General Elections 2026: Procedural Complexities and Shifting Alliances

Shaimaa Al-Baksh August 23, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print
Shaimaa Al-Baksh
By Shaimaa Al-Baksh Senior Researcher at the Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS)
Senior Researcher at the Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS)

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Egypt’s Industry: Steady Progress and Promising Prospects
Economic & Energy Studies November 11, 2023
The end of the beginning
International Relations December 12, 2020
The War to Come
Opinions Articles September 8, 2024
Egypt-US Relations: A Cornerstone of the US-Africa Partnership
Others December 17, 2022

Latest Tweets

//

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank providing decision-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was established in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from different generations and scientific disciplines.

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

Who we are

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS) is an independent Egyptian think tank established in 2018. The Center adopts a national, scientific perspective in examining strategic issues and challenges at the local, regional, and international levels, particularly those related to Egypt’s national security and core national interests.

The Center’s output is geared toward addressing national priorities, offering anticipatory visions for policy and decision alternatives, and enhancing awareness of various transformations through diverse forms of scientific production and research activities.

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?