By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    A Conflict-free Africa: Silencing the Guns and Owning the Future
    June 14, 2020
    Isolationism and Infiltrating Society: The Brotherhood’s Dual Presence in the UK
    February 15, 2021
    The New Reality in Afghanistan: The US in Search of a New Strategy
    September 7, 2021
    Latest News
    Will India Grow into a Rising Asian Tiger?
    February 7, 2023
    Growing Engagement: Rivalry of Major Asian Powers in Africa
    February 5, 2023
    Looking West: India’s Strategy and Relations with Egypt
    February 4, 2023
    Messages from the Polisario Front’s 16th Congress
    February 1, 2023
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    Trump’s war on TikTok
    September 1, 2020
    الضربة الأولى: انطلاق الاجتياح الروسي لأوكرانيا
    The First Strike: Russia Storms Ukraine
    February 27, 2022
    Strategic Shift: Iran’s role in Sanaa between Proxy Management and Direct Involvement
    November 7, 2020
    Latest News
    Reasons and Ramifications of Al-Shabaab’s Retreat from its Positions
    January 30, 2023
    Task Force 59: The New US Military Deployment Pattern in the Middle East
    November 30, 2022
    The Future of Relations between Al-Qaeda, Taliban and Islamic State After Al-Zawahiri’s Death
    August 27, 2022
    Israel’s Cyber ​​Dome: Hallmarks and Motives
    August 15, 2022
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    The Oil Market in the Shadow of Coronavirus: The Current Situation and Future Prospects
    September 10, 2020
    The New Administrative Capital: Egypt’s Promising Future
    October 6, 2021
    Accelerating Development: Maximizing the Role of the Private Sector
    September 19, 2022
    Latest News
    How will Forward Exchange Contracts Affect Egypt’s Market Stability?
    January 24, 2023
    Egypt’s Economic Gains from COP27
    December 14, 2022
    Global Crisis: Whither Inflation?
    December 8, 2022
    Climate Finance: Financial Resources and Investments to Address Climate Change
    December 4, 2022
  • Analysis
    • Analysis
    • Analytical article
    • Opinions Articles
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Library
    • Books
    • Digital Editions
    • Periodicals
    • Special Editions
  • العربية
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Netanyahu and Bennett: Indications of political change in Israel
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Will India Grow into a Rising Asian Tiger?
International Relations
Strategic Assessment for Israel 2023
Opinions Articles
Growing Engagement: Rivalry of Major Asian Powers in Africa
International Relations
Looking West: India’s Strategy and Relations with Egypt
International Relations
Messages from the Polisario Front’s 16th Congress
International Relations
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Analysis

Netanyahu and Bennett: Indications of political change in Israel

Shady Mohsen
Last updated: 2020/11/09 at 12:29 PM
Shady Mohsen
Share
12 Min Read
SHARE

The New Right Party leader and figurehead of the Yamina leader, Naftali Bennett, announced he will contest the position of prime minister in the upcoming elections. Bennett called for the Blue and White Party leader Benny Gantz to choose either to vote “no-confidence” in the government and form a new one, or to dissolve the Knesset and conduct fourth elections. Bennett’s call is not the only indication of the confusion miring Israel’s political landscape. There is a host of variables that add to that confusion, the most important of which is the coronavirus crisis. 

New factors in Israel’s political equation

New indicators emerged in Israel representing key inputs to the political landscape’s confusion, the most prominent of which are: 

  1. Decreasing political confidence among the Israeli public: 

Opinion polls by the Institute for National Security Studies and other Israeli think tanks, conducted on 16 September, showed that 70 percent of Israelis do not trust the Israeli government. In their opinion, the government failed to manage the coronavirus crisis on the medical and economic levels. Seventy-eight percent of Israelis worry about the medical crisis and 84 percent worry about the economic impasse. 

The polls also showed that 74 percent of Israelis have no confidence in the Knesset. In addition, 37 percent hold Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu completely responsible for the crises, 23 percent see him somehow responsible, and 40 percent see him not responsible for the economic and medical conundrums. 

Moreover, 61 percent believe that a new government must be formed and fourth elections conducted, and 39 percent disagree. Fifty-seven percent see the urge to continue demonstrations and 43 percent disagree. 

  1. Rifts in Israeli society:

The coronavirus crisis revealed the growing tensions between Haredim and secular Jews. Most recently, Haredi Jews were accused of spreading the virus. Both Netanyahu and the Israeli president denied the accusations as they endanger Israel’s security. 

  1. The political difference between Netanyahu and Gantz:

Netanyahu and Defense Minister Benny Gantz, who shares the duties of the government with the prime minister, faced some differences on the files they worked together on. 

The differences appeared in: A) The coronavirus crisis: Gantz indicated that the government floundered in handling the pandemic crisis and that the army should take over. B) The general budget: Gantz insisted on approving the budget for the entire fiscal year, while Netanyahu insisted on approving three months. C) Selling the US fighter F-35 to the UAE: Gantz expressed reservations on selling the US fighter to any Arab country, while Netanyahu announced his approval. 

  1. Rifts in far-right movements:   

A rift between far-right religious parties has emerged in a number of situations, such as: A) Ultra-Orthodox parties refused to conduct fourth elections in April 2020, which forced Netanyahu to sign a coalition deal with Gantz. B) The rift also appeared in Netanyahu’s position on the annexation of the Jordan Valley. C) Senior ultra-Orthodox rabbis in the Haredi community resented the closure of their schools during the lockdown. As a result, Netanyahu reconsidered his decision to lockdown again, and allowed them to hold their ceremonies and meet in forums.

The rise of Naftali Bennett

Naftali Bennett, who served as defence minister before Benny Gants, had preceded all Israeli political leaders, both opposition and government, in responding to these previous indicators, especially opinion polls. 

He sought to work on Israel’s internal affairs through targeting three key files: improving the economy, eliminating the coronavirus with medical tools, and unifying Israeli society. 

According to the latest public opinion polls, the Yamina list, led by Bennett, succeeded in winning 20 seats, which motivated him to promote himself as a substitute for Netanyahu. This success led the Yamina to withdraw from the far-right movements and consider a new name for itself that reflects its new orientations. 

Source: The researcher, based on Maariv newspaper

This withdrawal does not mean that the Yamina abandoned its ideology, but it means that Bennett is targeting a certain set of objectives, the most important of which are: 

  1. Dismantling the Yamina movement and rearranging it according to new objectives that are primarily aimed at stimulating the West Bank settlement policy. This is indicated by Bennett’s position against partial Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank, and the refusal to postpone or abolish the annexation of the Jordan Valley.
  1. Removing the Likud Party from the leadership of the far-right movement: Over the past five years, Likud has led the far-right movements, giving the party a base and a political influence that helped shape coalition governments over the past years. 

Bennett seeks to neutralize this specific Likud feature, and make it a feature of the Yamina bloc. In Bennett’s statement, he said he would seek to form a coalition of parties in which the National Union Party has a role. This way, Bennett reflects the trends of Israeli society, especially the Haredi community that is discontented with Netanyahu’s policies in handling the coronavirus crisis and Israel’s presence in the West Bank. As a result, he tipped the balance in his favor.

Netanyahu’s crisis

Public opinion polls seem to favor Bennett. Thirty-one percent of Israelis will vote for Bennett, 28 percent for Netanyahu, and 35 percent for neither. These figures raise an important question, is Netanyahu facing a real political crisis?

Netanyahu seems to face a very wide segment of Israeli society that insists on demonstrating against him due to his failure to manage the coronavirus crisis and the corruption cases he is charged with. On the other hand, he still does not have a real political opponent, which causes him a real crisis. Bennett, on the other hand, has not exhibited rational policy behavior yet. This is due to several reasons, notably:

  1. Bennett does not represent all Israelis: Although Bennett said that his first concern was the unification of Israeli society, and although he won 20 seats representing votes from almost all trends, in reality he targets only the extremist right-wing movements in Israel.

This is evident in his attack on Yisrael Beytenu Party, There Is a Future Party, and Blue and White Party. In other words, Bennett came out as anti-centrist, anti-left, and anti-less extreme right. This way, he aims to form a party coalition with only 40 seats.

  1. Bennett did not provide a clear political agenda: He relies solely on his anti-Netanyahu sentiment, but he does not offer a political program that explains how to overcome the coronavirus crisis and the economic dilemma.

In tandem, Netanyahu seeks correcting some of his mistakes, most notably improving the living conditions of West Bank settlers, who constitute Netanyahu’s most important political base. The United States once again declared its support for the legitimacy of Israeli settlements in the West Bank by approving a series of scientific cooperative agreements with the settlements, which means that the United States is about to lift the ban on US funding of Israeli scientific research projects in the West Bank and Golan Heights. In addition, a new director of the Yisrael program (the medical management of the coronavirus crisis) was appointed by the Israeli government. 

In conclusion, and based on the above, a set of points can be emphasized:

  1. The Haredi society (extremist ultra-Orthodox Jews) is Netanyahu’s most important political base. Therefore, Netanyahu will have to think twice before taking any decision related to their affairs, such as the lockdown the Haredi society rejects. 
  1. Netanyahu can identify the loopholes through which Bennett influences the political landscape, by quickly handling the rifts in the Yamina movement, such as providing economic incentives for settlement communities.
  1. Bennett’s withdrawal from the Yamina movement appears to be a political suicide, which can be understood through two possibilities. This shall be either an attempt to press Netanyahu for leadership positions in any future government coalition, or an attempt to impose a political presence of his party in Israeli political life, ending Netanyahu’s political future and promoting himself as a substitute for Netanyahu or the Likud Party.

Real signs of rifts in Israeli society are building up, the latest of which was the exchange of accusations between ultra-Orthodox and secular Jews concerning the spread of the coronavirus. The latest developments in the current political landscape in Israel are imposed by the trends of the Israeli society, which the political elites are trying to translate into some tactical moves. In the same context, the Israeli leaders’ actions do not necessarily reflect the true image of the political landscape in Israel, as the Israeli society is yet unstable. 

Related Posts

Strategic Assessment for Israel 2023

Messages from the Polisario Front’s 16th Congress

A Trump Card: Morocco Maximizes Benefit from Phosphate Amid Ukraine War

Danger and Opportunity

TAGGED: Bennett, Featured, Israel, Netanyahu, political change
Shady Mohsen November 9, 2020
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

The Issue of Financing in COP27 Agenda
Public Policy November 15, 2022
The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam .. Risk, fallacies and Potential Partnerships
ECSS Library September 8, 2020
GERD Back to The Fore: Contradictory Messages and Political Employment
International Relations October 18, 2020
Kyiv and the Great Winter Battle
Opinions Articles January 5, 2023

Latest Tweets

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank, providing decisions-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was establised in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from diffrent generations and scientific desciplines. 

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2022

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?