By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Egypt-France relations: Consensus and strategic partnership
    December 12, 2020
    Beyond Tigray: Wielding Hunger as a Weapon in Ethiopia’s Civil War
    August 22, 2021
    Cautious Trepidation: The International and Regional Response to the Ethiopian Crisis
    February 9, 2022
    Latest News
    Obstacles to Settlement: Is Peace in Yemen Drawing Closer?
    June 1, 2023
    Calculated Engagement: Washington and Violent Developments in Sudan
    May 29, 2023
    Significant Regression: Ennahda’s Trajectory in Tunisia after Ghannouchi’s Arrest
    May 17, 2023
    The Humanitarian Dimension: Egypt’s Role to Ease Sudan Crisis
    May 16, 2023
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    A Habitual Trend: Terrorist Organizations’ Exploitation of Natural Disasters
    March 25, 2023
    Why isn’t the Yemen war drawing to a close?
    March 27, 2021
    Israel’s Cyber ​​Dome: Hallmarks and Motives
    Israel’s Cyber ​​Dome: Hallmarks and Motives
    August 15, 2022
    Latest News
    Why Have TikTok Security Concerns Grown Globally?
    April 16, 2023
    Employing Loopholes: Escalating Pakistani Taliban Activity and its Repercussions
    April 1, 2023
    A Habitual Trend: Terrorist Organizations’ Exploitation of Natural Disasters
    March 25, 2023
    ChatGPT: Promising Applications, Potential Difficulties
    March 6, 2023
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Unprecedented Revival: Egypt’s Becomes Self-Sufficient in Natural Gas
    August 29, 2021
    A Comprehensive Vision: The Cultural and Touristic Dimensions of Developing Muhammad Ali’s Gunpowder Magazine
    A Comprehensive Vision: The Cultural and Touristic Dimensions of Developing Muhammad Ali’s Gunpowder Magazine
    June 21, 2022
    Effective Policies: Managing Inflation in Egypt in 2021
    February 8, 2022
    Latest News
    Boosting Presence: The Economic Implications of Iranian President’s Visit to Syria
    May 27, 2023
    Scenarios for Energy Crisis Management in the European Union
    May 20, 2023
    Reading into Egypt’s Foreign Debt
    May 13, 2023
    Development Trends in Sinai
    May 2, 2023
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Library
    • Books
    • Digital Editions
    • Periodicals
    • Special Editions
  • العربية
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: The US and Risks of Militarization in East Asia
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Obstacles to Settlement: Is Peace in Yemen Drawing Closer?
Arab & Regional Studies
Two Summits: Conciliatory in Jeddah and Conflicting in Hiroshima
Opinion
“Iraq and Egypt are the Arab Nation’s Shield and Sword”, Says Ammar Al-Hakim
Activities & Events
Calculated Engagement: Washington and Violent Developments in Sudan
American Studies
Boosting Presence: The Economic Implications of Iranian President’s Visit to Syria
Economic & Energy Studies
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Opinions Articles

The US and Risks of Militarization in East Asia

Dr. Ahmad Sayed Ahmad
Last updated: 2023/01/12 at 12:31 PM
Dr. Ahmad Sayed Ahmad
Share
7 Min Read
SHARE

The recently announced change in Japan’s defense strategy, which calls for the development of military capabilities, an increase in military spending to $320 billion over the next five years, and the use of preventive and counterattack strikes against external threats, represents a significant departure from the country’s long-standing military doctrine that has relied on defense since World War II within the framework of a peaceful constitution. This shift will bear strategic and security ramifications for the East Asian region. 

Japan took this step in response to China’s escalation of military action against Taiwan, North Korea’s advancement of its nuclear and ballistic missile program, and the repeated firing of long-range ballistic missiles into the Sea of Japan. Collectively, these developments ratcheted up the pressure on Tokyo to build up its defenses in order to counter these threats within the framework of a deterrence strategy.

Japan’s decision to increase military spending will undoubtedly have a significant impact on regional security and on Japan’s adversaries, particularly North Korea and China, who both strongly opposed Tokyo’s move and saw it as harmful and a threat to each of them, harkening back the spirit of the Second World War and Japan’s regional expansion during that time.

What Japan did was, though, predictable given the militarization strategy that has dominated interactions on the Korean Peninsula and in Southeast Asia recently. This was particularly the case under Joe Biden’s administration, which is marked by escalation and de-escalation by the axis that includes North Korea and China and that which includes the United States, Japan, and South Korea.

After diplomacy and dialogue failed to settle the North Korean nuclear and missile file, the United States resorted to the “stick policy” of imposing more economic sanctions, which prompted North Korea to escalate its rhetoric and develop its missile capabilities, including the Hwasong-17 missile, which has a range of more than 10,000 kilometers and can target all of US territory.

Simultaneously, the Biden administration abandoned strategic ambiguity in its approach to Taiwan and adopted a more confrontational stance towards China, by providing Taiwan with modern weapons or politically supporting its independence. Such support was evidenced by the visit of Speaker of the US House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan a few months ago and President Biden’s repeated announcements to stand by Taiwan militarily against any Chinese military intervention.

China was compelled by this to pursue an escalation and deterrence policy and strengthen its military. This year, China’s military budget exceeded $330 billion, while the US military budget was $770 billion.

Beijing views Taiwan as an integral part of the Chinese mainland and considers its independence to be a serious transgression. As such, it worked to develop a wide array of strategic smart weapons, including long-range missiles, stealth aircraft, and aircraft carriers to deter US threats and prevent Taiwan’s independence. Furthermore, Russia and China have strengthened their strategic partnership and have participated in joint military drills.

Indeed, the US backing of a military buildup in Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula serves a dual purpose. First, within the context of the strategic struggle over the international order, the United States seeks to stifle China’s rise militarily and economically by igniting a new front of conflict and inflaming tension in the region, draining China by trying to recreate the Ukraine situation on the Taiwan front. China, however, is cautious about stumbling into the American trap. For Beijing, the United States’ acceptance of the new Japanese defense strategy will fortify the US-Japanese military alliance, which incites China and North Korea to increase their military spending and armament. Second, there is an economic rationale for the US backing for Taiwan, as the increased sales of US arms to Japan and South Korea help stimulate the US economy, which is having a hard time recovering from the effects of historically high inflation and high costs.

There are numerous risks associated with US militarization of this vital region. First, the escalating hostility between the various actors poses a threat to regional stability and security and could spark a major confrontation in a region that is home to nearly half of the world’s population and numerous nuclear weapons. Indeed, the US will not engage in any military conflict and will instead use the proxy war approach, as it did in Ukraine. Second, this uptick in tensions sparks a nuclear arms race in the region and a trend toward the development of military capabilities, both of which have an impact on the pace of development in these countries because they call for substantial funding. Additionally, militarization and the escalation strategy reduce the likelihood of diplomacy and dialogue in resolving complex and divisive issues, particularly in relation to the peaceful resolution of North Korea’s nuclear program, pacification of Taiwan, and reconciliation between the two Koreas.

In short, escalation and brinkmanship policies run the risk of creating disastrous situations, so it is important to prioritize diplomacy, dialogue, and wisdom when handling regional conflicts. Given the suffering caused by the Russo-Ukrainian conflict, the world cannot afford the costs associated with opening a new front.

Related Posts

African Peace Initiative to End Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Drones and the Kremlin Bring Back Excitement to the Ukraine War

A Fresh Eye on the Sudanese Issue

The Israeli Question – Again

TAGGED: East Asia, Militarization, Risk, US
Dr. Ahmad Sayed Ahmad January 12, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Al-Sisi in Djibouti: Consolidating Egypt’s presence in the Horn of Africa
International Relations July 26, 2021
Climate Issues: Global and Egyptian Perspectives
ECSS Library November 8, 2022
Afghanistan’s Awaited Battle Between the Islamic State Caliphate and Taliban Emirate
International Relations August 30, 2021
High sea strategies
Analysis October 28, 2021

Latest Tweets

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank, providing decisions-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was establised in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from diffrent generations and scientific desciplines. 

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2022

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?