By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Another obstacle on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam?
    June 5, 2020
    Varied paths of reform in Africa
    March 22, 2019
    G20 Membership Justified: Africa and the Road to the G20
    June 14, 2020
    Latest News
    A Parallel Path: How Do Israel’s Right-Wing Parties Handle Being Left Out of the War Government?
    November 30, 2023
    The Social Repercussions of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood on Israel
    November 26, 2023
    Indications of Timing: Gaza’s Seventh War
    November 21, 2023
    Multiple Calculations: Normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel 
    November 18, 2023
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    A Multi-dimensional Affair: Women and Terrorism in Africa
    June 14, 2020
    On deradicalisation: Marc Sageman and the psychology of jihadists
    June 22, 2020
    Assessing Deterrent Measures and the Prospects of War: US Military Movement in the Gulf to Confront Iran
    June 22, 2020
    Latest News
    A Tactical Evaluation of Gaza’s Military Scene
    November 27, 2023
    Strategic Deception in the October War
    October 5, 2023
    Explaining the Rise of Daesh in Syria
    August 26, 2023
    Clashes in Tripoli: Do Rapid Developments in Libya Clash with the Road Map?
    August 22, 2023
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Sinai: A Strategy for Development amid Fighting Terrorism
    June 17, 2020
    Egypt’s Comprehensive Vision for Human Rights
    June 22, 2020
    The Right to Health in Egypt
    June 22, 2020
    Latest News
    How do Rumors Affect Egypt’s Financial Inclusion? — The Case of Fawry
    November 28, 2023
    Economic Drain: The Gaza War and Israeli Gas Production
    November 20, 2023
    Egypt’s Industry: Steady Progress and Promising Prospects
    November 11, 2023
    A Surge in Revenues: Reading into the Suez Canal’s Performance and Robust Growth
    November 6, 2023
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: The US and Risks of Militarization in East Asia
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
A Parallel Path: How Do Israel’s Right-Wing Parties Handle Being Left Out of the War Government?
Palestinian & Israeli Studies
How do Rumors Affect Egypt’s Financial Inclusion? — The Case of Fawry
Economic & Energy Studies
A Tactical Evaluation of Gaza’s Military Scene
Defense & Security
The Social Repercussions of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood on Israel
Arab & Regional Studies
Indications of Timing: Gaza’s Seventh War
Palestinian & Israeli Studies
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Opinions Articles

The US and Risks of Militarization in East Asia

Dr. Ahmad Sayed Ahmad
Last updated: 2023/01/12 at 12:31 PM
Dr. Ahmad Sayed Ahmad
Share
7 Min Read
SHARE

The recently announced change in Japan’s defense strategy, which calls for the development of military capabilities, an increase in military spending to $320 billion over the next five years, and the use of preventive and counterattack strikes against external threats, represents a significant departure from the country’s long-standing military doctrine that has relied on defense since World War II within the framework of a peaceful constitution. This shift will bear strategic and security ramifications for the East Asian region. 

Japan took this step in response to China’s escalation of military action against Taiwan, North Korea’s advancement of its nuclear and ballistic missile program, and the repeated firing of long-range ballistic missiles into the Sea of Japan. Collectively, these developments ratcheted up the pressure on Tokyo to build up its defenses in order to counter these threats within the framework of a deterrence strategy.

Japan’s decision to increase military spending will undoubtedly have a significant impact on regional security and on Japan’s adversaries, particularly North Korea and China, who both strongly opposed Tokyo’s move and saw it as harmful and a threat to each of them, harkening back the spirit of the Second World War and Japan’s regional expansion during that time.

What Japan did was, though, predictable given the militarization strategy that has dominated interactions on the Korean Peninsula and in Southeast Asia recently. This was particularly the case under Joe Biden’s administration, which is marked by escalation and de-escalation by the axis that includes North Korea and China and that which includes the United States, Japan, and South Korea.

After diplomacy and dialogue failed to settle the North Korean nuclear and missile file, the United States resorted to the “stick policy” of imposing more economic sanctions, which prompted North Korea to escalate its rhetoric and develop its missile capabilities, including the Hwasong-17 missile, which has a range of more than 10,000 kilometers and can target all of US territory.

Simultaneously, the Biden administration abandoned strategic ambiguity in its approach to Taiwan and adopted a more confrontational stance towards China, by providing Taiwan with modern weapons or politically supporting its independence. Such support was evidenced by the visit of Speaker of the US House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan a few months ago and President Biden’s repeated announcements to stand by Taiwan militarily against any Chinese military intervention.

China was compelled by this to pursue an escalation and deterrence policy and strengthen its military. This year, China’s military budget exceeded $330 billion, while the US military budget was $770 billion.

Beijing views Taiwan as an integral part of the Chinese mainland and considers its independence to be a serious transgression. As such, it worked to develop a wide array of strategic smart weapons, including long-range missiles, stealth aircraft, and aircraft carriers to deter US threats and prevent Taiwan’s independence. Furthermore, Russia and China have strengthened their strategic partnership and have participated in joint military drills.

Indeed, the US backing of a military buildup in Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula serves a dual purpose. First, within the context of the strategic struggle over the international order, the United States seeks to stifle China’s rise militarily and economically by igniting a new front of conflict and inflaming tension in the region, draining China by trying to recreate the Ukraine situation on the Taiwan front. China, however, is cautious about stumbling into the American trap. For Beijing, the United States’ acceptance of the new Japanese defense strategy will fortify the US-Japanese military alliance, which incites China and North Korea to increase their military spending and armament. Second, there is an economic rationale for the US backing for Taiwan, as the increased sales of US arms to Japan and South Korea help stimulate the US economy, which is having a hard time recovering from the effects of historically high inflation and high costs.

There are numerous risks associated with US militarization of this vital region. First, the escalating hostility between the various actors poses a threat to regional stability and security and could spark a major confrontation in a region that is home to nearly half of the world’s population and numerous nuclear weapons. Indeed, the US will not engage in any military conflict and will instead use the proxy war approach, as it did in Ukraine. Second, this uptick in tensions sparks a nuclear arms race in the region and a trend toward the development of military capabilities, both of which have an impact on the pace of development in these countries because they call for substantial funding. Additionally, militarization and the escalation strategy reduce the likelihood of diplomacy and dialogue in resolving complex and divisive issues, particularly in relation to the peaceful resolution of North Korea’s nuclear program, pacification of Taiwan, and reconciliation between the two Koreas.

In short, escalation and brinkmanship policies run the risk of creating disastrous situations, so it is important to prioritize diplomacy, dialogue, and wisdom when handling regional conflicts. Given the suffering caused by the Russo-Ukrainian conflict, the world cannot afford the costs associated with opening a new front.

Related Posts

The Gaza Events and Telling Facts

The West’s Perspective of Gaza’s Future

Fifty Years on: The Realities of the October War (4)

Dealing with Conflict in the Sahel

TAGGED: East Asia, Militarization, Risk, US
Dr. Ahmad Sayed Ahmad January 12, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Boosting Egypt’s Foreign Exchange through Tourism
Economic & Energy Studies August 3, 2023
“Iraq and Egypt are the Arab Nation’s Shield and Sword”, Says Ammar Al-Hakim
Activities & Events May 30, 2023
Long Shadows: The impact of informality on economic recovery
Public Policy August 4, 2021
Latent Escalation: Will Calm in the Eastern Mediterranean Last in 2022?
International Relations January 20, 2022

Latest Tweets

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank, providing decisions-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was establised in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from diffrent generations and scientific desciplines. 

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?