By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    The Conflict of Visions on GERD
    June 15, 2020
    The Muslim Brotherhood and the West: Reading through Official UK Documents (3)
    March 1, 2021
    The European Situation Towards Afghanistan Refugees
    September 21, 2021
    Latest News
    Israel’s African gambit
    March 6, 2026
    Geopolitical realism: What does Washington’s return to the African Sahel mean?
    March 5, 2026
    Analysis | Manufacturing opposition: How Israel uses digital platforms to shape Iranian public opinion
    February 14, 2026
    Analysis| Turkey without terrorism: Assessing the trajectory of Turkish–Kurdish reconciliation
    February 12, 2026
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    Messages of military drills: Is the region on the brink of a new war?
    April 5, 2021
    Europe amid US–Iran Escalation: Can It Play the Diplomat or Become Entangled in the Crisis?
    April 13, 2025
    The Future of Relations between Al-Qaeda, Taliban and Islamic State After Al-Zawahiri’s Death
    August 27, 2022
    Latest News
    Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
    April 15, 2026
    Encrypted messages “Roaring Lion”: The hidden messages behind the name of the operation against Iran
    March 11, 2026
    Iran war developments
    March 9, 2026
    Manufacturing the enemy : Reframing terrorism in contemporary Western discourse
    March 7, 2026
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Why Does Egypt Expand in the Establishment of International Schools?
    October 24, 2020
    The National Strategy to Combat FGM: What’s Next?
    October 14, 2021
    Epidemiological Surveillance in the Egyptian Health System
    October 15, 2022
    Latest News
    Reading into attacks on maritime navigation in the Arabian Gulf
    March 17, 2026
    Emerging economies in a world without rules: Between opportunity and predicament
    March 5, 2026
    The end of economic globalization: Reading into the 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy
    February 4, 2026
    Weaponization of Resources: The Role of Rare Earth Metals in the US-China Trade War
    May 25, 2025
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Russian Uncertainty and Chinese Anger: US-Vietnam Arms Deal Talks
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
The future of US-Iran negotiations
Opinion
Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
Terrorism & Armed Conflict
Russia, China, and the war against Iran
Others
Continental drift
Others
Deadlock in the Strait of Hormuz
Others
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Asian Studies

Russian Uncertainty and Chinese Anger: US-Vietnam Arms Deal Talks

Ahmed El-sayed
Last updated: 2023/10/03 at 8:17 PM
Ahmed El-sayed
Share
11 Min Read
SHARE

On 10 September, US President Joe Biden made a historic visit to Vietnam and agreed with his Vietnamese counterpart Vo Van Thuong to advance bilateral relationship to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, the highest degree of cooperation between two countries. The two administrations also discussed the largest arms transfer in history. If the two countries reach an agreement on this deal, it will alter the regional balance of military power, infuriate China, diminish Russia’s influence, and cause additional unrest.

Contents
From Hostility to Collaboration: How Have US-Vietnam Relations Changed Over Time?Strengthening Security CooperationWhat Does the Conclusion of the US-Vietnam’s Arms Deal Signify?Infuriating ChinaRussia’s Worries

From Hostility to Collaboration: How Have US-Vietnam Relations Changed Over Time?

Over the years, US-Vietnam relations have undergone significant changes, which can be categorised into several key phases:

Vietnam War (1955-1975): During this time, the United States supported the Republic of South Vietnam in its fight against the People’s Democratic Republic of North Vietnam and the Viet Cong. In 1973, US troops left Vietnam, and the Republic of South Vietnam was overthrown in 1975, bringing the war to an end.

Post-Cold War: After the end of the Cold War, relations between the United States and Vietnam were tense and communication was poor for a very long time.

Normalisation and Cooperation: In the 1990s, relations between Washington and Hanoi improved gradually. 1995 saw the reopening of the US Embassy in Hanoi. Economic and trade ties strengthened as well, with Vietnam becoming one of the United States’ key trading partners in Southeast Asia.

Growing Partnership: In recent years, the United States and Vietnam’s relationship has evolved into a growing partnership. Along with cooperation in fields like climate change and public health, this cooperation also involved economic and security cooperation.

Strengthening Security Cooperation

From the perspective of geopolitics and security, the recent visit to Vietnam by President Biden has strengthened the United States’ presence in the region, from the gate of Hanoi, and has increased Beijing’s anger and Moscow’s anxiety. To achieve a more even playing field in the geopolitical competition with China in the Pacific region, Biden’s administration negotiated the largest arms transfer in history between the two Cold War foes, the United States and Vietnam.

However, the final details of the deal have not yet been worked out, and it is possible that the negotiations will stall. Nevertheless, this subject dominated the official discussions between the United States and Vietnam.

The United States sees great potential in its security partnership with Vietnam. Hanoi is keen on acquiring some US systems, particularly those that can help it better monitor its maritime territory, as well as transport aircraft and cutting-edge weapons.

Vietnam previously relied heavily on Russia for its armaments, but the conflict between Russia and Ukraine has strained Hanoi’s relations with Moscow and made it more challenging to get supplies and replacement parts for Russian-made weapons.

Washington is more optimistic that a portion of Vietnam’s estimated $2 billion annual budget for arms imports can be diverted in the long run to weapons from the United States or its allies and partners, particularly South Korea and India. In order to assist the financially strapped Hanoi in ending its reliance on less expensive Russian weapons, Washington is also taking special financing conditions into consideration.

There was also talk of the United States providing Hanoi with F-16 fighter aircraft. Hanoi has also expressed a strong interest in a number of American-made defense systems, particularly transport and maritime patrol aircraft, including fighter aircraft.

Some US officials have suggested that the sale of American F-16 fighter jets to Hanoi is part of the package that could be implemented next year. Given that the Vietnamese Air Force has historically relied on Russian-made fighters like the Su-30, Su-27, and Su-22, the acquisition of the Lockheed Martin F-16 by Vietnam will be a historic event. The F-16 Block 70 Viper, which is the most advanced version of the aircraft and is outfitted with a variety of weapons systems as well as some fifth-generation technology, is anticipated to be made available by Washington to Hanoi.

What Does the Conclusion of the US-Vietnam’s Arms Deal Signify?

If the US and Vietnam are able to reach an agreement on the historic arms deal, many different effects, particularly on geopolitical and economic levels, are likely to follow, including 1) a significant growth of Vietnam’s military capabilities, which could irritate China and increase tensions between the two countries; 2) bolstering military and strategic ties between the United States and its ally, Vietnam, to counter Chinese influence; 3) Russia losing a significant market for exporting its weapons, which will reduce its strategic influence in the region; 4) positive economic effects on the United States through the defense industry and job creation; and 5) long-term complication of regional relations and escalation of tensions with China.

Infuriating China

The conclusion of a major arms deal between the US and Vietnam will undoubtedly enrage China in light of the escalation of the long-standing territorial dispute between Vietnam and China in the South China Sea, for a variety of considerations, including:

  • Vietnam and China have political and territorial disagreements regarding who has the right to control the South China Sea. Any increase in Vietnam’s military prowess could therefore be interpreted as a potential danger to Beijing’s interests.
  • China believes that the United States is attempting to weaken China’s influence by boosting its own in the Asia-Pacific region. As a result, US-Vietnamese security cooperation could be seen as a component of an American effort to confront China.
  • China thinks that this agreement will give Vietnam access to cutting-edge US technologies, tipping the balance of power against it.
  • China is thus anticipated to voice its disapproval and irateness towards a deal that supports Vietnam’s military capabilities.

Russia’s Worries

Once concluded, the significant arms deal between the US and Vietnam is very likely to cause concern in Russia for a number of reasons, including:

  • Vietnam depends heavily on Russian arms and military equipment. Historically, Moscow has been one of Vietnam’s most important arms suppliers, and this agreement marks Vietnam’s entry into the American sphere of influence.
  • In addition, Russia views Southeast Asia as strategically significant to its ability to exert influence globally; as a result, Hanoi signing a significant agreement with the US could reduce Russian influence over Vietnam and increase US presence.
  • Moscow is extremely concerned and incensed by any increased American interference in its spheres of influence because it sees the United States as a global strategic rival that is vying with it for influence.
  • If this deal goes through, Vietnam will gradually stop relying on Russian weapons as its primary supplier of military hardware, and Russia will lose one of its most significant military clients in the region, which will reduce its influence there. Consequently, this agreement could represent a blow to Russia’s military influence in Vietnam.

In conclusion, we have multiple lenses through which to examine Washington’s possible decision to sell weapons to Vietnam. The United States’ overarching strategy to increase its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, which includes bolstering its diplomatic and military ties with Vietnam, may have played a role in the decision. Hanoi is viewed as an important player in the fight against Chinese expansionism and for regional stability in Southeast Asia. If this deal goes through, it will change the balance of military power in the region and threaten regional stability. China will not keep quiet, and we might see a rise in diplomatic or military tensions between China and the United States or Vietnam. Given that Vietnam’s purchase of advanced US weapons will help to bolster its deterrent capabilities against China, this deal may encourage China to increase defense spending in order to maintain its military balance. Furthermore, since the agreement will give Vietnam access to US expertise in a variety of areas, including air and naval defense, it will increase the fears of other nations, including North Korea, which will encourage them to improve their military prowess. Last but not least, once this agreement is finalized, security alliances in the region will become more nuanced, with pro- and anti-deal groups emerging. Trust between the different actors may erode over time, which makes it difficult to work together to solve many other challenges.

Related Posts

Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran

Encrypted messages “Roaring Lion”: The hidden messages behind the name of the operation against Iran

Weaponization of Resources: The Role of Rare Earth Metals in the US-China Trade War

Power Play: Why Is Azerbaijan Setting Its Sights on the Horn of Africa?

TAGGED: USA, Vietnam
Ahmed El-sayed October 3, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print
Ahmed El-sayed
By Ahmed El-sayed
Senior Researcher, Asian Studies Unit

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

The Future of the India-Pakistan Ceasefire
Asian Studies May 19, 2025
Contradiction and conflict in statements and deception in positions have become Ethiopia’s usual habits when dealing with the issue of the Renaissance Dam, from the first day of construction and till now.
Info graph August 27, 2020
Steps and Challenges of Building the New Tunisian Republic
International Relations July 6, 2022
Lebanon’s economic crunch and fuel shortages
Public Policy September 12, 2021

Latest Tweets

//

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank providing decision-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was established in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from different generations and scientific disciplines.

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

Who we are

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS) is an independent Egyptian think tank established in 2018. The Center adopts a national, scientific perspective in examining strategic issues and challenges at the local, regional, and international levels, particularly those related to Egypt’s national security and core national interests.

The Center’s output is geared toward addressing national priorities, offering anticipatory visions for policy and decision alternatives, and enhancing awareness of various transformations through diverse forms of scientific production and research activities.

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?