By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Effective Engagement: Egypt’s Role in Combating Terrorism within the Framework of Community of Sahel-Saharan States
    June 14, 2020
    Egypt and Greece as Essential Allies
    January 25, 2021
    Belated Attention: International Response to the Humanitarian Crisis in Ethiopia
    August 31, 2021
    Latest News
    Expanding Financial Inclusion in Egypt with InstaPay
    March 28, 2023
    Heated Competition: Syria’s Phosphate and Russian-Iranian Spheres of Influence
    March 22, 2023
    Structural Causes of Economic Decline in South Africa
    March 18, 2023
    Consolidation of Presence: Israel Heads to West Africa via Sudan and Chad
    March 11, 2023
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    Threat of terrorism to human rights in Egypt and the world
    June 22, 2020
    Containing Tensions: Can Libya's Political Transition Be Saved?
    Containing Tensions: Can Libya’s Political Transition Be Saved?
    December 22, 2021
    Reasons and Ramifications of Al-Shabaab’s Retreat from its Positions
    January 30, 2023
    Latest News
    A Habitual Trend: Terrorist Organizations’ Exploitation of Natural Disasters
    March 25, 2023
    ChatGPT: Promising Applications, Potential Difficulties
    March 6, 2023
    Coping with Challenges:
    ISIS from Operation Kayla Mueller to the Syria Earthquake
    March 4, 2023
    Reasons and Ramifications of Al-Shabaab’s Retreat from its Positions
    January 30, 2023
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Aviation Industry and National Security
    August 17, 2020
    Biodiversity and Natural Reserves in Egypt
    September 30, 2021
    ريادة مصرية: اقتصاديات الهيدروجين الأخضر
    Egypt at the Leading Edge: Economics of Green Hydrogen
    September 4, 2022
    Latest News
    Imminent Challenges: Hunger and Global Food Security Disruption
    March 14, 2023
    How will Forward Exchange Contracts Affect Egypt’s Market Stability?
    January 24, 2023
    Egypt’s Economic Gains from COP27
    December 14, 2022
    Global Crisis: Whither Inflation?
    December 8, 2022
  • Analysis
    • Analysis
    • Analytical article
    • Opinions Articles
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Library
    • Books
    • Digital Editions
    • Periodicals
    • Special Editions
  • العربية
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: How Serious are Preparations to Face Iran?
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Expanding Financial Inclusion in Egypt with InstaPay
International Relations
Marking the Day Egypt Restored Taba, and the Challenges Ahead
Opinions Articles
A Habitual Trend: Terrorist Organizations’ Exploitation of Natural Disasters
Terrorism & Armed Conflict
The World is Changing
Opinions Articles
Heated Competition: Syria’s Phosphate and Russian-Iranian Spheres of Influence
International Relations
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Opinions Articles

How Serious are Preparations to Face Iran?

Khaled Okasha
Last updated: 2023/02/25 at 3:31 PM
Khaled Okasha
Share
8 Min Read
SHARE

Numerous recent writings on the Iran issue, especially those by Americans and Israelis, focused on a rallying intended to reorganize the regional alliances in order to create a fresh strategy for confronting Iran. US coordination and Israeli promotion and pressure are helping toward a more concrete definition of the potential roles of the parties that are poised to join this echelon.

Along with this “seasonal” momentum, some contend that this made-up scene is not reflective of the true state of affairs, which has not yet fully developed. It’s noteworthy that there have been previous escalation-related outbursts in this file that quickly died down. This is why there is constant skepticism, and there are still ambiguous areas where no one seems willing to speak up and offer some level of certainty regarding an impending military conflict, about which many questions are raised.

The first of these questions will inevitably concern the parties involved in that confrontation, if it ever occurred. Now that we know about the Iranian side, what about the other side? Aside from the United States and Israel, who have their own calculations, which we will discuss later, what is of most interest to the region’s countries and who in the region actually participated in this arrangement. 

There is evidence that some countries have been contacted regarding this matter. Here, questions arise regarding whether the United States put pressure on or offered incentives to Arab capitals in order for them to get ready to play certain roles, as well as what those roles are and how big of an impact they are anticipated to have. Possibly, in the same context, it will be more important to determine the extent to which Arabs support the US-Israeli vision, assuming they have a unified opinion that they will act accordingly. Evidence and leaks of bilateral contacts have revealed an intriguing fact: Israel still plays the role of catalyst with some parties, while the US remains in its gray zone, waiting for the ranks to be regularized.

The gray area for the United States is not, however, a state of inaction, but rather a path that leads to the realization and enforcement of the country’s most pressing and vital interests at that time, such as some armament agreements with regional countries that typically take place outside of this kind of hypothetical momentum. The most significant step was taken with Israel a month ago, when both countries participated in the Juniper Oak joint military exercise, the largest ever between them, as it included land, air, and sea components, as well as a first-of-its-kind space capabilities and cyber protection exercise. More than 140 aircraft, including a B-52 strategic bomber, and 12 naval assets, including the USS George W. Bush aircraft carrier and six Israeli ships and submarines, took part in the exercise. The US military exercise Juniper Oak took place in Israel, and its primary goal was to strengthen interoperability between the two armies. This would allow the US Central Command, which is focused on solidifying a developing regional security structure, to send reassuring or discouraging signals to allies and potential adversaries alike. 

A few days after the drill concluded, discrepancies between US and Israeli statements regarding the Juniper Oak began to emerge. Israeli reports claimed that the exercise included a “simulation” of attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, but US officials went on to present technical denials on the subject. However, these seemed to be vague denials that were made in conjunction with the admission that Washington intends to broaden the scope of the Juniper Oak drills by encouraging other countries in the region to take part in analogous significant and difficult maneuvers. This raises new questions about the intended audience and the outcomes expected from this encouragement, especially given that the US Central Command at that stage focuses primarily on the breadth of air defense systems and exercises, in terms of deployment capable of protecting the skies over the region from the threat of cruise missiles and marches with modern technologies, and on balancing Iranian capabilities that, in light of the advancements made to its Bavar-373 missile system, are now perceived by the US military to be so dangerous that serious effort is thought to be necessary to achieve a point of balance.

In Washington, there are those who rule out the idea of going to war with Iran, but no one has refuted the idea of intervening with cutting-edge tactics and plans that enable neutralizing Iran’s capacity to possess nuclear weapons. The nature of these plans, which were announced twice as presidential commitments, first in July 2022 under the “US-Israel Strategic Partnership Joint Declaration” and then two days later at the Jeddah Security and Development Summit, where the Gulf Cooperation Council as well as Egypt, Jordan, and Iraq participated, remains shrouded in mystery, though.

On the other hand, a scene that some have compared to these peculiar preparations was recently made public by a document published by Iranian media. It contained a letter from the Iranian Assistant Foreign Minister for Economic Affairs to the First Vice President in which he expressed his surprise that Chinese and Russian companies have both slowed down their participation in Iranian oil and gas projects. The letter contained what appeared to be a report on 10 oil and gas fields, some of whose rehabilitation projects were given to Russia and China and others of which were given to them.

Some claim that concerns about Iran’s future led Russian and Chinese businesses to abandon this crucial investment. This raises the new question of how much we share the same concern, not about Iran, but about the regional security balance equation, in which the hidden appears to be significantly greater than the declared.

This op-ed was originally published in Al-Ahram on 18

Related Posts

Marking the Day Egypt Restored Taba, and the Challenges Ahead

The World is Changing

Reflecting on the Arab Regional System

Consolidation of Presence: Israel Heads to West Africa via Sudan and Chad

TAGGED: Iran, Israel, US
Khaled Okasha February 25, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print
Khaled Okasha
By Khaled Okasha
General Manager

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Germany’s unconditional support of Israel in the fourth Gaza war
International Relations June 10, 2021
Falsifying Consciousness: The Mental and Social Impacts of “Trends”
Public Policy November 2, 2022
Messages of military drills: Is the region on the brink of a new war?
Defense & Security April 5, 2021
Egypt Hosted Talks: Libya’s Rapprochement
Analysis October 3, 2020

Latest Tweets

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank, providing decisions-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was establised in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from diffrent generations and scientific desciplines. 

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2022

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?