By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    GERD Back to The Fore: Contradictory Messages and Political Employment
    October 18, 2020
    Will the Gaza War help Netanyahu form a government?
    May 22, 2021
    A Test of Democracy: Corruption and Violence Outbreak in South Africa
    A Test of Democracy: Corruption and Violence Outbreak in South Africa
    December 9, 2021
    Latest News
    Israel’s African gambit
    March 6, 2026
    Geopolitical realism: What does Washington’s return to the African Sahel mean?
    March 5, 2026
    Analysis | Manufacturing opposition: How Israel uses digital platforms to shape Iranian public opinion
    February 14, 2026
    Analysis| Turkey without terrorism: Assessing the trajectory of Turkish–Kurdish reconciliation
    February 12, 2026
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    Egypt-Kenya military and defense pacts
    June 10, 2021
    What Does Daesh’s Targeting of Qassem Soleimani’s Grave Signify?
    January 15, 2024
    Sinai: Human Rights and Combating Terrorism
    June 22, 2020
    Latest News
    Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
    April 15, 2026
    Encrypted messages “Roaring Lion”: The hidden messages behind the name of the operation against Iran
    March 11, 2026
    Iran war developments
    March 9, 2026
    Manufacturing the enemy : Reframing terrorism in contemporary Western discourse
    March 7, 2026
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Telda: The future of digital banks in Egypt
    July 25, 2021
    How Did the Russia-Ukraine War Affect the Russian Economy?
    April 10, 2022
    Social protection: Egypt’s efforts to alleviate poverty and support the neediest groups
    July 31, 2021
    Latest News
    Reading into attacks on maritime navigation in the Arabian Gulf
    March 17, 2026
    Emerging economies in a world without rules: Between opportunity and predicament
    March 5, 2026
    The end of economic globalization: Reading into the 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy
    February 4, 2026
    Weaponization of Resources: The Role of Rare Earth Metals in the US-China Trade War
    May 25, 2025
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Lack of Decisiveness: The Sudan War, Seven Months On
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
The future of US-Iran negotiations
Opinion
Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
Terrorism & Armed Conflict
Russia, China, and the war against Iran
Others
Continental drift
Others
Deadlock in the Strait of Hormuz
Others
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
African Studies

Lack of Decisiveness: The Sudan War, Seven Months On

Salah Khalil
Last updated: 2023/11/16 at 5:14 PM
Salah Khalil
Share
9 Min Read
SHARE

The Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have been at war for seven months now, but the decisive moments still seem far off. The military engagements have spread across five states: Al-Jazirah, Khartoum, Kordofan, South Darfur State, and West Darfur State. The RSF, however, appears to have opened multiple battlefronts in an attempt to broaden the scope of the conflict, deplete the SAF, and distribute its efforts along multiple fronts. This prevents the concentration and assembly of forces and the resolution of the conflict in Khartoum, which is thought to be the primary focus of the ongoing battles during this stage.

Contents
Changing Confrontation MapImplications and Outcomes

This paper provides an analysis of the current state of the conflict map, the prevailing battlefield conditions, the resulting consequences, and the factors that contribute to military indecisiveness.

Changing Confrontation Map

Omdurman, Khartoum, and Khartoum Bahri are experiencing an escalation in military engagements, where airstrikes, artillery barrages, and intense battles transpired between the warring sides. Alongside military aircraft and light and heavy weapons, the SAF’s drones destroyed RSF bases in the vicinity of Al-Ailfoun and Jabal Awliya, both of which are located south of Khartoum. Military operations persist in the capital, Khartoum, where hostilities between the opposing sides have escalated in several regions following the drone bombardment of RSF positions in the Eastern Nile State and the Jabra neighborhood, which is adjacent to the Armored Corps unit in southern Khartoum and has been one of the most populated areas by RSF members since its inception, along with Riyadh, Berri, Al Mansheiya, and Al-Taifi east of the capital.

The RSF sites in Sports City and the campgrounds in the city of Soba, east of Khartoum, were the targets of the Sudanese Air Force’s frequent sorties. The air force also detonated bombs on RSF bases located in the Khartoum Central Market and Arkaweet neighborhoods. Heavy weapon-driven violent clashes are taking place, paralleling analogous conflicts in distinct regions. Additionally, in south and west Omdurman, the SAF targeted RSF sites and concentrations, focusing on the northern regions of the Al-Thawra suburb.

The RSF executed a concurrent assault on locations situated to the north of Khartoum Bahri, specifically targeting an army military equipment depot near Wadi Seidna Air Base. Additionally, they discharged several shells at the headquarters of the Corps of Engineers. In response, the SAF employed artillery shelling on sites in the Al-Murabbaat neighborhood region, situated to the south of Omdurman, an area that is utilized by the RSF to launch attacks against the Corps of Engineers from within residential neighborhoods.

Following its failure to alter the situation on the ground and suffering heavy losses in equipment and personnel, the RSF withdrew to Al-Jazirah State, which shares an eastern border with Khartoum, and the northwestern regions of the state, specifically the Al-Maseed and Al-Thawra areas. However, substantial military reinforcements from the SAF were promptly dispatched to those areas, and any RSF concentrations in the Gezira Scheme were eliminated. Additionally, border patrols were conducted by the SAF between the states of Khartoum and Al-Jazirah.

Battles continued in the state capital of Nyala, located in the western region of the country, where the RSF is attempting to regain control in order to gain leverage that will allow it to obtain a strong pressure card that will allow it to gain some ground in the subsequent rounds of negotiations, particularly in light of its failure to seize control of Khartoum or make strategic advances in the newly conquered territories.

In North Kordofan State, the RSF launched separate attacks on El-Obeid three months ago with the goal of besieging the city’s capital, but all of their attempts failed as the SAF confronted those attempts, and the RSF suffered heavy losses. In the city of Dilling, South Kordofan state, violent clashes and confrontations also broke out between the SAF and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North, led by Aziz Al-Hilu, as the SPLM-N attempted to expand its sphere of influence in the midst of the current unstable security situation. This marked the SPLM-North’s second assault on this city in the past three months; however, its forces were severely defeated both times.

In the meantime, a cycle of civil unrest broke out in Central Darfur state as a result of recurrent fighting between the Beni Halba and Salamat tribes in the Wastani area of Mukjar locality. Dozens of members of both tribes lost their lives in these conflicts, with the Native Administration failing to resolve the conflict. The Native Administration hopes to hold a reconciliation conference between the two parties at the end of October.

Implications and Outcomes

After seven months of fighting, the RSF has lost control of key strategic locations, but it is still trying to establish military dominance in major cities like El-Obeid, which serves as a key link between Khartoum and the rest of the states in western Sudan. The RSF further utilized the states of the Darfur regions as critical corridors for logistical support throughout the war. They engaged in significant battles with the SAF in order to gain access to key cities, but were unable to achieve a resolution due to the intricate military and tribal dynamics that encompassed the numerous theaters of operation.

Multiple stakeholders persistently strive to achieve a successful resolution. Political and civil forces, for instance, have proposed an initiative based on the necessity of forming an umbrella mechanism that includes regional partners like the League of Arab States, the African Union, the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), and the United Nations to exert more efforts to bring an end to the war and prevent any external interference and complication of the current crisis. It is worth noting that these proposals have been supported by a number of active Sudanese political forces, including the Sudan’s Pro-Democracy Bloc, the National Movement Forces, the National Accord Forces, the Sudan Revolutionary Front, as well as the Native Administration, civil society, women, and revolutionary youth forces.

In conclusion, the complex aftereffects of the military conflict in Sudan and, after roughly seven months of fighting between the SAF and the RSF, the military operations between them have not ended the fighting that has been ongoing since last April. This raises valid questions about how long the war in Sudan is expected to last and the nature of the non-military solutions proposed to end the conflict in the coming months.

Related Posts

Geopolitical realism: What does Washington’s return to the African Sahel mean?

Xeer Ciise: Clan Tensions in Western Somaliland | Analysis

A diplomatic maneuver: Israel’s recognition of Somaliland

Gearing up for Somalia’s General Elections 2026: Procedural Complexities and Shifting Alliances

TAGGED: Sudan
Salah Khalil November 16, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print
Salah Khalil
By Salah Khalil
A researcher at Al-Ahram Center for Social and Historical Studies

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Post-Gaza Conflict—The Way Back
Opinion September 2, 2024
The Consolidated List of Terrorism: New Entities and Candidates
Analysis July 5, 2022
ChatGPT: Promising Applications, Potential Difficulties
Cyber Security Defense & Security March 6, 2023
Sudan’s Economic Reform Program and Paris Club Debts
International Relations August 24, 2021

Latest Tweets

//

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank providing decision-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was established in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from different generations and scientific disciplines.

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

Who we are

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS) is an independent Egyptian think tank established in 2018. The Center adopts a national, scientific perspective in examining strategic issues and challenges at the local, regional, and international levels, particularly those related to Egypt’s national security and core national interests.

The Center’s output is geared toward addressing national priorities, offering anticipatory visions for policy and decision alternatives, and enhancing awareness of various transformations through diverse forms of scientific production and research activities.

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?