By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    The Conflict of Visions on GERD
    June 15, 2020
    The Muslim Brotherhood and the West: Reading through Official UK Documents (3)
    March 1, 2021
    The European Situation Towards Afghanistan Refugees
    September 21, 2021
    Latest News
    Israel’s African gambit
    March 6, 2026
    Geopolitical realism: What does Washington’s return to the African Sahel mean?
    March 5, 2026
    Analysis | Manufacturing opposition: How Israel uses digital platforms to shape Iranian public opinion
    February 14, 2026
    Analysis| Turkey without terrorism: Assessing the trajectory of Turkish–Kurdish reconciliation
    February 12, 2026
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    Messages of military drills: Is the region on the brink of a new war?
    April 5, 2021
    Europe amid US–Iran Escalation: Can It Play the Diplomat or Become Entangled in the Crisis?
    April 13, 2025
    The Future of Relations between Al-Qaeda, Taliban and Islamic State After Al-Zawahiri’s Death
    August 27, 2022
    Latest News
    Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
    April 15, 2026
    Encrypted messages “Roaring Lion”: The hidden messages behind the name of the operation against Iran
    March 11, 2026
    Iran war developments
    March 9, 2026
    Manufacturing the enemy : Reframing terrorism in contemporary Western discourse
    March 7, 2026
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Why Does Egypt Expand in the Establishment of International Schools?
    October 24, 2020
    The National Strategy to Combat FGM: What’s Next?
    October 14, 2021
    Epidemiological Surveillance in the Egyptian Health System
    October 15, 2022
    Latest News
    Reading into attacks on maritime navigation in the Arabian Gulf
    March 17, 2026
    Emerging economies in a world without rules: Between opportunity and predicament
    March 5, 2026
    The end of economic globalization: Reading into the 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy
    February 4, 2026
    Weaponization of Resources: The Role of Rare Earth Metals in the US-China Trade War
    May 25, 2025
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: To What Extent do US Media Biases Affect the Course of Presidential Elections?
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
The future of US-Iran negotiations
Opinion
Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
Terrorism & Armed Conflict
Russia, China, and the war against Iran
Others
Continental drift
Others
Deadlock in the Strait of Hormuz
Others
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
International Relations

To What Extent do US Media Biases Affect the Course of Presidential Elections?

Belal Manzour
Last updated: 2020/10/22 at 11:28 AM
Belal Manzour
Share
15 Min Read
SHARE

US visual media play an integral role in following-up and broadcasting election development. Studies on the relationship between media and US elections focused on two main issues: US media bias that resulted in further polarization between the Democratic and Republican parties; and the varying effect of visual media on the behaviour of US voters. 

Thus, it is important to explore the extent of polarization in the US media before the presidential elections, scheduled for next month, and try to find an answer to the question “to what extent can the media affect voters’ preferences?”

Deepening polarization

Currently, the US media and TV channels are extremely biased, bearing in mind that visual media biases is not a new phenomenon. That was evident through the number of studies, during the 1990s and the early 2000s, that tackled the relations between media bias and elections. Thus, the current US media tendencies towards polarization is part of a problem enshrined in the US society for years. Towards the end of 2019, Pew Research Centre conducted a survey on political polarization in the media before the elections. The results of the survey showed that there is an evident, deepened state of division among the American people about trusting the sources of information that TV channels broadcast before the elections. There are several reasons for the deepened political polarization between the Democrats and Republicans on TV channels, including: 

1- Increasing confidence gaps: The studies conducted by Pew Research Centre and Gallup/Knight Foundation concluded that both the Republicans and Democrats trust two completely contradictory media environments. The surveys indicated that over the last six years partisan polarization in the media has increased and confidence gaps have widened. In 2014, a study found that there is an increasing lack of confidence in traditional media – such as the CNN, MSNBC, and NBC, and printed papers such as The New York Times – among the Republicans. On the other hand, the Democrats trust media sources such as the Politico and The Washington Post.

Out of 30 visual and published media sources, the results of the study showed that the Republicans highly trust only seven media sources, trust two with 33 percent, and mistrust 20. Fox News came on top of the list of channels trusted by the Republicans with 65 percent, and ABC News came next with 33 percent. 

Concerning the Democrats, the results were completely different. The majority of Democrats trust 22 media sources, 13 out of them received more than 33 percent, and mistrusted eight (that are mainly trusted by the Republicans). 

Amid this polarization and lack of confidence in the media, two media sources are mistrusted by both Republicans and Democrats, which are PBS News and The Wall Street Journal. 

2- Partisan bias: One of the main obvious differences between the Republicans and Democrats is that the latter trust a larger number of media sources than Republicans, which reflects the amount polarization in the media, the partisanship of the Democrats and Republicans, and the credibility of media sources that both parties depend on at the time of elections. 

In general, Republicans and Republican loyalists follow politics and election news through a limited number of media sources. Sixty percent of Republicans depend on only one source, which is Fox News; and 24 percent watch CNN, despite the fact that they do not trust it. On the other hand, Democrats – including independents who lean toward Democrats – rely on an array of sources. The Democrats follow CNN with 53 percent, NBC with 40 percent, ABC with 37 percent, and both CBS and MSNBC with 33 percent. Although the Democrats do not trust Fox News, 23 percent of them follow it, which proves that following a particular media source does not necessarily mean trusting it. 

3- Ideological division: The ideological aspect of conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats indicates the biggest confidence gaps in media sources. Survey results have shown that Republicans trust Fox News by 65 percent and CNN by 23 percent. 

However, conservative Republicans trusted Fox News by 75 percent, and mistrusted CNN by 16 percent. The same applies to the Democrats. Moderate Democrats trust CNN by 67 percent, and Fox News by 23 percent; however, liberal Democrats trust CNN by 70 percent, and Fox News by 12 percent. The figures indicate the increasing confidence gap between conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats concerning CNN and Fox News, which affirms the confidence gap between the moderates of the two parties in general. 

Reasons for the lack of trust

The Republicans don’t trust the media due to:

  1. Trump’s attack on the media: On many occasions, President Trump attacked the US media. Previously, he accused the CNN of promoting fake news, and the Republicans supported him. He also threatened to take legal steps against The New York Times, after it had published ethical scandals related to him. Moreover, Trump believes the media is the main reason for increasing the severity of violence in the American society. 
  2. Some 31 percent of Republicans and five percent of Democrats described reporters and media professionals as lacking ethical standards. However, this opinion is more common among Republicans who completely support Trump by 40 percent, and Republicans who relatively support Trump by 57 percent. 
  3. Political awareness: Some of the people with high political and electoral awareness have been polarized by the media. Despite the fact that the confidence gap between the Democrats and moderate Republicans is at 46 percent, the gap widens and reaches 75 percent among the Democrats who are politically aware and trust the media by 91 percent, and Republicans with political awareness, who trust the media by 16 percent. However, the gap decreases to 16 percent among Democrats with less political awareness by 62 percent and their Republican counterparts by 46 percent.
  4. Demographic division: Demographic distribution related to people’s characteristics such as race, religion, education, and age shows different percentages of trust in the media. For example, African Americans usually have more trust in news agencies and channels that tackle their issues than White or Hispanic Americans; and older Americans are more loyal to their favourite channels than the younger ones. 
  5. The media’s role in society: Republicans adopt a negative view of the role of the media in society. They believe that media professionals care only about good posts. They also see that media erodes democracy, has bad intentions, and is unprofessional in its news reports. 

The media’s influence

The University of California, Berkeley, conducted a study on the impact of Fox News on the voting behaviour of its followers, especially after the channel reached 20 percent of American cities from 1996 to 2000. The results of the study indicated that there is no noticeable impact of the conservative Fox News on the voting behaviour of its followers during the presidential elections from 1996 to 2000; as only 2.1 percent of its followers voted for the Democratic Party. In addition, the channel didn’t affect the voters’ turnout. However, the channel pushed conservative Republicans to increase their contributions in the partisan campaigns and the political programs of local state candidates. The reason behind the lack of influence of the channel, according to the study, is voters’ awareness at the time of media bias.

In an estimate of the channel’s persuasion rates, it was revealed that in 2000, 58 percent of Fox News followers, who used to be Democrats, supported the Republican candidate by the end of the elections. In 2004, the persuasion rate was 27 percent; and in 2008, it stood at 28 percent. Moreover, the influence of Fox News increased over the presidential elections throughout 2004-2008. 

In 2017, American Economic Review issued a study on the impact of Fox News on the US elections and voting for Republican candidates from 2000 to 2012. The study found that the channel contributed to increasing the voting for the Republican Party during the presidential elections. It also found that the channel caused a shift in viewers’ attitudes and pushed them to vote for Republican candidates.

The study also stated that if it were not for Fox News, the Republican presidential candidate’s share of the bipartisan vote would have been lower by 3.59 points in 2004 and 6.34 points in 2008. In other words, the Democratic candidate, John Kerry, would have been the winner in 2004, and Barack Obama’s 2008 victory would have turned into an overwhelming victory, with more than 60 percent of the two parties ’votes. The study affirmed that watching three more minutes of Fox News on a weekly basis during 2008 could have made a Democratic or centrist voter one percentage point more likely to vote for Republicans. Another finding of the study is that the impacts of both CNN and MSNBC on centrist voters were relatively limited, as they did not adopt an ideological agenda targeting persuading the viewers of a particular candidate. In 2008, MSNBC was able to convince only eight percent of the Republicans to vote for the Democrats. 

In the 2016 elections, Fox News was the most popular channel, described by some as Trump’s propagandist. Twenty percent of the voters followed it as their main source of news.  The head of Niskanen Research Centre in Washington stated that if it were not for Fox News, President Trump would have left the White House because of the Miller Commission report. The channel launched propaganda campaigns supporting Trump, the thing that other US presidents did not experience before, and was able to increase the number of his supporters. 

In conclusion, the latest estimates issued in September 2020 indicate that less than half the Americans trust the media, and 63 percent mistrust the material the media promotes and believe that the media content should be analytically viewed in order to expand the horizon for building confidence in media in the future. Moreover, 60 percent of the viewers do not feel a personal connection with the news channel that they follow. The increasing polarization rates and partisanship in the media may lead to shifting a supporter of one party to the other. The increasing confidence gap among Republicans, who trust Fox News by 65 percent and ABC by 33 percent, and the stability of confidence percentages among Democrats, makes the majority of Republicans depend mainly on Fox News and its campaigns and propagandas. 

The major impact of the media on the path of US presidential elections cannot be denied. However, the Americans have become more aware of the policies and dynamics of these channels, and they ask many questions regarding their funds; except for the Republicans and conservatives who are still biased towards their news channels. 

Related Posts

Israel’s African gambit

Geopolitical realism: What does Washington’s return to the African Sahel mean?

Analysis | Manufacturing opposition: How Israel uses digital platforms to shape Iranian public opinion

Analysis| Turkey without terrorism: Assessing the trajectory of Turkish–Kurdish reconciliation

TAGGED: Featured, Presidential Elections, US Media
Belal Manzour October 22, 2020
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print
By Belal Manzour
Researcher at European studies unit

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Geostrategic Ambitions: Israel’s Calculations in the Red Sea
Palestinian & Israeli Studies May 7, 2023
Boosting Egypt’s Foreign Exchange through Tourism
Economic & Energy Studies August 3, 2023
The Future of Washington-Brotherhood Relations
International Relations September 6, 2021
Gains with Strings Attached: Demarcating the Lebanon-Israel Land Border
Arab & Regional Studies May 6, 2025

Latest Tweets

//

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank providing decision-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was established in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from different generations and scientific disciplines.

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

Who we are

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS) is an independent Egyptian think tank established in 2018. The Center adopts a national, scientific perspective in examining strategic issues and challenges at the local, regional, and international levels, particularly those related to Egypt’s national security and core national interests.

The Center’s output is geared toward addressing national priorities, offering anticipatory visions for policy and decision alternatives, and enhancing awareness of various transformations through diverse forms of scientific production and research activities.

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?