By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Varied paths of reform in Africa
    March 22, 2019
    Two years on Stockholm: Yemen between comprehensive settlement and conflict management
    December 31, 2020
    A Test of Strength: The Relationship between the Iraqi state and the Popular Mobilization Forces Following Qasim Muslih’s Release
    August 26, 2021
    Latest News
    A historic role: Egypt and the Palestinian cause since 1948
    May 23, 2026
    Employing maritime corridors in conflicts: Lessons learned
    May 20, 2026
    Israel’s security and economic conundrum:How does Israel confront the challenges of a protracted war with Iran?
    May 2, 2026
    Reshaping the US position toward Israel: From the erosion of the old consensus to a new conflict across parties, state, and society
    April 23, 2026
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    On deradicalisation: Marc Sageman and the psychology of jihadists
    June 22, 2020
    Israel’s Multiple Objectives to Attack Rafah
    February 19, 2024
    Where Does Daesh Stand in Syria’s Current Escalation?
    December 7, 2024
    Latest News
    Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
    April 15, 2026
    Encrypted messages “Roaring Lion”: The hidden messages behind the name of the operation against Iran
    March 11, 2026
    Iran war developments
    March 9, 2026
    Manufacturing the enemy : Reframing terrorism in contemporary Western discourse
    March 7, 2026
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Egypt’s Comprehensive Vision for Human Rights
    June 22, 2020
    Sustaining Momentum: Egypt’s Strategy to Boost Water Security
    September 9, 2021
    The Dark Side: The Impact of Climate Change on Women
    July 7, 2022
    Latest News
    Analysis| Egypt economic path and IMF negotiations amid escalating regional energy crisis
    May 11, 2026
    From global shock to Egypt’s economy: Analyzing the impact of the Iran war on energy security
    May 3, 2026
    Egypt as a balancing power: Why Cairo rejects the logic of wars in the Middle East
    April 30, 2026
    Militarizing water in Middle East wars A strategic analysis of the Iran-US-Israel war
    April 18, 2026
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Deadlock in the Strait of Hormuz
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
A historic role: Egypt and the Palestinian cause since 1948
Palestinian & Israeli Studies
Employing maritime corridors in conflicts: Lessons learned
Arab & Regional Studies
Analysis| Egypt economic path and IMF negotiations amid escalating regional energy crisis
Economic & Energy Studies
From global shock to Egypt’s economy: Analyzing the impact of the Iran war on energy security
Economic & Energy Studies
Israel’s security and economic conundrum:How does Israel confront the challenges of a protracted war with Iran?
Palestinian & Israeli Studies Research Programs
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Others

Deadlock in the Strait of Hormuz

Mina Adel
Last updated: 2026/04/05 at 3:11 PM
Mina Adel
Share
9 Min Read
SHARE

On 12 March, UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) reported that Source Blessing, a container ship chartered to Hapag-Lloyd and sublet to its alliance partner Maersk, was operating on Maersk’s M04 shuttle service in the Gulf.

A small fire was reported on board, though a damage assessment could not be carried out in the dark. The vessel is currently anchored in the northwestern part of the Gulf, having been en route to the Omani port of Sohar before the outbreak of the war.

The incident marked the 14th attack on vessels sailing in the Arabian Gulf, some of which had attempted to transit the Strait of Hormuz. The following day, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said that “the only thing prohibiting transit in the strait right now is Iran shooting at shipping. It is open to transit should Iran not do that.”

In December last year, the Iranian Navy staged the Shahid Mohammad Nazeri naval drills, followed in January by the exercise Deterrence 1404 and Smart Control drills in February. These manoeuvres converged on a single strategic objective: the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

They were under close US scrutiny. Dan Caine, a seasoned military strategist and chairman of the US Joint chiefs-of-staff, fully recognised the gravity of the situation. According to the Wall Street Journal, “Caine told the president in several briefings that US officials had long believed Iran might attempt to block the critical shipping lane using naval mines, drones and missiles if conflict erupted. Trump reportedly acknowledged the risk but decided to move forward with the military campaign, telling advisers he believed Tehran would likely capitulate before taking such a step, and that the US military would be capable of reopening the waterway if necessary.”

The Iranian Tasnim news quoted Alireza Tangsiri, commander of the naval forces of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), as saying in a statement that claims by the United States about destroying Iran’s navy or providing safe escort for oil tankers were false. The Strait of Hormuz has not been militarily blocked and is merely under control, it said.

“The Strait of Hormuz is open. It is only closed to the tankers and ships belonging to our enemies, to those who are attacking us and their allies. Others are free to pass.”

This raises the important question of why Caine finds the situation so difficult to manage, despite the near-total destruction of the Iranian naval fleet in recent days?

The answer lies in Iran’s calculated use of Gulf topography to shape a strategy centred on its so‑called Strategic Gatekeeper Islands. The unoccupied islands of Qeshm and Hormuz command the main shipping lanes, while the occupied islands of Greater and Lesser Tunbs and Abu Musa provide positions for coastal missile batteries and radar systems directly in the path of approaching naval groups.

From these vantage points, Tehran has layered three lines of coastal defence: Raad and Noor missiles with ranges of 120 to 200 km that can span the Strait of Hormuz and effectively shut it to surface traffic; Qader and Ghadir extended‑range variants reaching up to 300 km and capable of striking targets deep into the Gulf of Oman or central Persian Gulf; and Khalij Fars anti‑ship ballistic missiles designed to hit moving vessels such as carrier strike groups.

Beyond conventional missile deployments, Iran has also embraced an unconventional “Smart Control” doctrine. This integrates swarms of more than a thousand loitering munitions, Shahed and Arash types launched from coastal silos, with thousands of fast-attack craft armed with missiles and employing swarm tactics to overwhelm Aegis‑class defences. Naval mines add a further layer, serving as a low‑cost but highly effective tool for physically blocking shipping routes.

US Navy destroyers and aircraft carriers are primarily designed for operations in the open ocean and not the shallow waters of the Gulf. This was the principal reason for the deployment of US Coast Guard cutters in the region prior to combat operations, most of them from the Sentinel class.

These vessels are armed only with multi‑calibre machine guns and lack the robust defensive systems needed to withstand sustained Iranian strikes. By contrast, destroyers are capable of providing escort duties, yet the shallow waters and their proximity to shore make them far more vulnerable to attack.

US Central Command (CENTCOM) Chief Brad Cooper, himself a naval officer, is acutely aware of this critical situation.

According to the Wall Street Journal, “US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth has approved a request from US Central Command for an element of an Amphibious Ready Group and attached Marine Expeditionary Unit… An Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) typically includes an assault ship, two transport docks, and a support vessel that carries an embarked Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) of at least 2,200 Marines.”

The units now slated to deploy to the Middle East include the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, comprising roughly 2,200 marines and sailors equipped with light armoured vehicles. Most of the force will be embarked aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Tripoli, supported by the cruiser USS Robert Smalls and the destroyer USS Rafael Peralta.

In addition, the 31st MEU brings significant airpower to the theatre, with the ability to operate F‑35B fighters alongside AH‑1Z Viper, UH‑1Y Venom, and CH‑53E Super Stallion helicopters.

There is little doubt that the deployment of this force marks a turning point in Operation Epic Fury against Iran. It is expected to succeed in sweeping assaults against any island or area it seeks to seize near the Strait of Hormuz, with Iranian forces unable to withstand the overwhelming firepower from air and sea accompanying the marines.

But the entire operation hinges on the unit’s ability to endure Iran’s relentless war of attrition and waves of drone and ballistic missile strikes continuing day and night for days on end.

While an Iranian ground counterattack against the US marines is unlikely given American air superiority, the persistent use of artillery, drones, and varied munitions will ensure constant pressure not only on the expeditionary force but also on shipping transiting the Strait of Hormuz.

The USS Tripoli will require two weeks to reach its new destination from Japan, a deployment that will be preceded by sustained preparatory fire on the Iranian islands. In the meantime, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is reinforcing its positions, deploying additional drone and missile launch platforms in the Zagros Mountains and establishing new observation posts.

The coming weeks are certain to yield hard lessons from the ongoing military operations, where the absence of diplomacy leaves both sides relying solely on force to impose their will.

Published in cooperation between the Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies, Al-Ahram Weekly, and the English-language portal Ahram Online

Related Posts

A historic role: Egypt and the Palestinian cause since 1948

Israel’s security and economic conundrum:How does Israel confront the challenges of a protracted war with Iran?

Egypt as a balancing power: Why Cairo rejects the logic of wars in the Middle East

Reshaping the US position toward Israel: From the erosion of the old consensus to a new conflict across parties, state, and society

TAGGED: Iran, iran war, Israel, trait of Hormuz
Mina Adel April 5, 2026
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

GERD: Ethiopia’s Motives and Challenges
Analysis June 15, 2020
Employing Loopholes: Escalating Pakistani Taliban Activity and its Repercussions
Terrorism & Armed Conflict April 1, 2023
Security Implications of Piracy Resurgence in the Gulf of Aden and Bab El-Mandeb
Defense & Security June 25, 2024
The Neutral Mediator: Is Oman the Gateway to Arab Openness towards Syria?
Arab & Regional Studies April 8, 2023

Latest Tweets

//

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank providing decision-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was established in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from different generations and scientific disciplines.

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

Who we are

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS) is an independent Egyptian think tank established in 2018. The Center adopts a national, scientific perspective in examining strategic issues and challenges at the local, regional, and international levels, particularly those related to Egypt’s national security and core national interests.

The Center’s output is geared toward addressing national priorities, offering anticipatory visions for policy and decision alternatives, and enhancing awareness of various transformations through diverse forms of scientific production and research activities.

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?