By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    African Natural Resources: Opportunities and Challenges
    June 14, 2020
    Quartet ends boycott of Qatar
    January 9, 2021
    Talibanistan or Civil War: Scenarios for the Afghanistan Crisis
    August 30, 2021
    Latest News
    Structural Causes of Economic Decline in South Africa
    March 18, 2023
    Consolidation of Presence: Israel Heads to West Africa via Sudan and Chad
    March 11, 2023
    Opportunities and Challenges: Turkish Rapprochement with the Syrian Regime
    March 9, 2023
    Challenges and Risks: Nigeria’s General Elections
    March 8, 2023
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    Egypt’s Vision for Combating Terrorism
    June 22, 2020
    Strategic partnerships: Al-Sisi’s messages on Egyptian-Iraqi relations at Baghdad Summit
    September 5, 2021
    Egypt-Kenya military and defense pacts
    June 10, 2021
    Latest News
    ChatGPT: Promising Applications, Potential Difficulties
    March 6, 2023
    Coping with Challenges:
    ISIS from Operation Kayla Mueller to the Syria Earthquake
    March 4, 2023
    Reasons and Ramifications of Al-Shabaab’s Retreat from its Positions
    January 30, 2023
    Task Force 59: The New US Military Deployment Pattern in the Middle East
    November 30, 2022
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Human Rights in Egypt: Pragmatic Translation of Political Will
    June 22, 2020
    Lebanon’s economic crunch and fuel shortages
    September 12, 2021
    New Policies to Provide Effective Training for Teachers
    August 24, 2022
    Latest News
    Imminent Challenges: Hunger and Global Food Security Disruption
    March 14, 2023
    How will Forward Exchange Contracts Affect Egypt’s Market Stability?
    January 24, 2023
    Egypt’s Economic Gains from COP27
    December 14, 2022
    Global Crisis: Whither Inflation?
    December 8, 2022
  • Analysis
    • Analysis
    • Analytical article
    • Opinions Articles
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Library
    • Books
    • Digital Editions
    • Periodicals
    • Special Editions
  • العربية
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Sinai: Human Rights and Combating Terrorism
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Structural Causes of Economic Decline in South Africa
African Studies
Reflecting on the Arab Regional System
Opinions Articles
A Gray Phase: Have the West and Iran Agreed on the Red Lines?
Analytical article
Imminent Challenges: Hunger and Global Food Security Disruption
Economic & Energy Studies
New Tactics and Multiple Challenges Evaluating Combat Efficiency of Russian-Ukrainian Air Operations
Analytical article
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Defense & Security

Sinai: Human Rights and Combating Terrorism

Ahmed Mohamed
Last updated: 2020/06/22 at 11:17 PM
Ahmed Mohamed
Share
15 Min Read
SHARE

Egypt has been in a continuous battle against terrorism since September 2015, when the two phases of Operation Martyr’s Right was launched. In February 2018, Egypt embarked on Comprehensive Operation Sinai. Despite the national and regional complications, the Egyptian state adopted a course that was in line with human rights and international law principles and regulations.

1-Combating terrorism in a complicated environment amid dangerous shifts

There are many factors concerning Sinai’s security environment, including:

– Prior to the outbreak of the current wave of terrorism in Sinai, which began in the wake of the 25 January 2011 Revolution, the security situation in Sinai was fraught with many threats, perhaps the most prominent of which was the presence of hundreds of border tunnels with the Gaza Strip, which constituted a tributary to threaten the Egyptian national security, given the ability of terrorist and criminal elements to infiltrate from the Gaza Strip into Sinai through these tunnels.

– The nature of the “limited” Egyptian security presence in Sinai for decades has allowed an environment of chaos to develop, which has in turn formed other types of security threats, particularly illegal activities such as arms and drug trades and smuggling. Later, these became the pillars of the phenomenon of terrorism, where terrorist organizations allied themselves with smuggling networks, organized crime gangs and illegal trade groups.

– After 2011, Sinai witnessed a change in the traditional structure of society, in which tribalism, with its known traditions, constituted the active social pattern in managing social lifestyles. The changes Sinai witnessed with the overthrow of the previous regime and the deterioration of the security system led to the surfacing of new players that imposed changes of social interests on the expense of the traditional social formula. These new groups focused on their alliances and interests, regardless, and sometimes in opposition to, the public interests and traditions established in the community.

– The repercussions of the comprehensive developments in Sinai contributed to the emergence of violent extremist organizations which were formed in two phases. The first phase was from 2011 to 2014. These organizations adopted the Islamic State doctrine. Jihadi doctrines adopted from Palestinian organizations also started to have a voice in the peninsula. Other groups, connected to local organizations with a radical and extremist inclination, tended to be violent and to bear arms. Driven by regional shifts, the majority of these organizations, however, adopted a different approach in 2014 and became more violent.

– The regional situation, particularly in neighboring countries, contributed to the thriving of terrorist groups to a great extent. Egypt’s borders with its neighboring countries became a source of threat, such as the case with the eastern border with the Gaza Strip, and the repercussions of the difficult security conditions in Libya, which witnessed the growth of terrorist organizations focusing their attacks on Egypt. That is in addition to the borders with other countries the nature of which are extremely complicated from the topographical aspect as well.

– The political and security conditions Egypt experienced until the launch of an organized program to combat terrorism in Sinai constituted an obstacle to confronting the rise of terrorism. This was manifested in the numerous terrorist attacks on Egyptian security forces and Sinai residents, in addition to the attack on Al-Rawda Mosque, which was one of the worst terrorist operations Egypt had to endure in its modern history. The aim of that attack was to oblige society to obey the orders of terrorist groups.

2- Egypt’s method to counter terrorism

Despite the unprecedented violence of terrorist attacks on the Egyptian arena and their extension to larger and more complicated environments, Egypt appeared to adopt a method that was different than in other countries. The method can be explained as follows:

A- Countering traditional threats

The most obvious of these threats is the nature of the combat scene. Sinai’s border with the Palestinians is not tightly controlled, which could threaten international navigation in the Suez Canal. The tunnels, however, are the more serious threat. The state adopted more than one path to counter these threats, such as:

– Tightening control over the eastern border: This was done through establishing a buffer zone for national security reasons. Residents of the border strip were evacuated to close the tunnels and to deal with their threats without endangering the lives of residents. This method was adopted by many countries that were facing threats on its borders, such as Saudi Arabia, that transported tens of villagers from its southern borders with Yemen to secure their lives.

– Fixing damages: Here Egypt adopted the principles and regulations of international law and human rights, such as:

* Relocating residents gradually after giving them a prior notice and helping residents relocate to a decent place. It was the municipal authorities that informed the residents they needed to evacuate.

* The state paid a total of EGP 1.5 billion in financial compensation to the relocating residents, after each case was individually studied. The compensations were given out based on whether the residents were house owners or tenants and whether they had a farm, a house, or both.

– Operating with a strategic vision to treat long-standing imbalances: The Egyptian state built residential projects comprising 10,000 residential units, in addition to Bedouin housing units that took into consideration Sinai’s architectural culture. The state also established water desalination stations, solar energy and electric power plants, hospitals, healthcare units, schools and universities, etc.

It can be noticed that the state established the buffer zone in Sinai taking into consideration:

– Committing to Article 63 of the Egyptian constitution which prohibits forced evacuation. Legally, what happened in Sinai was a relocation necessitated for national security reasons to tighten security on the border.

– Egypt didn’t change the demographic composition of the area, nor did it replace its residents with other inhabitants. The reality on the ground confirms that the buffer zone was created to halt the threats that resulted from the infiltration of Egypt’s borders and widening the network of tunnels under its borders that were connected to a number of houses in the area.

– The area was already dangerous to its inhabitants. During the wars witnessed in the Gaza Strip, the lives of many residents were endangered and on many occasions the borders were infiltrated. 

– The financial compensation was an unprecedented move with an unprecedented amount of cost. The compensation was in line with the basic regulations of the Egyptian and international law.

– The state provided residents of the buffer zone with alternative means to live safely away from the security operations and the constructions conducted to tighten security over the borders.

B- Egypt’s fight against terrorism is a special case

It is well known that Sinai was one of the areas that suffered from difficult economic conditions, where development was stalled for decades. This was one of the logistical factors for the growth of terrorist groups, illegal trafficking, smuggling networks and organized crime. There is also the factor of the expansion of regional terrorist networks. However, Egypt was careful during its operations against terrorists, even with the area’s inhabitants being one of the problems encountering it.

This was affirmed by the head of state and a number of military leaders. They said they could have evacuated Sinai’s residents to target the terrorist organizations, but they didn’t do that, and they exercised the highest degree of self-control. 

There are multiple indicators that prove that Egypt’s fight against terrorism is a special case, such as:

– Fighting terrorism and developing the peninsula simultaneously: The state is moving ahead with its war against terrorism in tandem with effecting the plan of development. Combating terrorism didn’t stop Egypt from establishing the largest infrastructure network in Sinai’s history at the cost of EGP 250 billion. Maybe some restrictions caused a slowdown in a number of construction operations but they were not cancelled.

– There are continuous efforts to seize illegal activities. This is done by fighting crimes, reducing the recruitment of criminals in terrorist groups, and closing the smuggling outlets that allow terrorists to infiltrate Egypt’s borders.

– In some cases, Sinai residents were apprehended during security checks. However, according to numerous official reports, most of them were released. Sinai citizens who sustained damages from the violence that resulted from terrorist activities, or from unintentional errors during the combating terrorists, were compensated.

– During certain periods, when there were restrictions on the transportation of food and supplies, due to transportation difficulties, the state worked to provide food for free or for discounted prices until the restrictions were lifted.

– As much as it could and with the tightest of security arrangements to ensure their safety, the state allowed domestic and international media outlets in Sinai. This writer was among the journalists who attended a part of Comprehensive Operation Sinai during his stay in the peninsula for two weeks to follow up on developments on the ground. Tens of media reports were published on the subject.

3- Conclusions

There are exceptional circumstances that forced the Egyptian state to operate based on security reasons in Sinai. The state worked to deal with the repercussions, but never did these circumstances lead the country to operate outside the boundaries of international law and human rights.

In fact, Egypt’s fight against terrorism is a special case because it combated terrorism in tandem with development operations, which added to the country’s economic burdens which the state shouldered, be it in infrastructure operations, economic development or compensations. The state looked at that burden as part of a comprehensive plan to improve the security and social conditions of Sinai.

The fight against terrorism is a long-term operation in light of its evolution as a phenomenon and the difficulty of completely rooting it out. The war against terrorism cannot succeed if there was not a strong state that enforces security networks that can limit terrorist operations and protect the people from being recruited by terrorist groups.

Recommendations

– There is an urgent need to accelerate the development of areas damaged from terrorist operations. Although this adds to the burdens of the state, it is important to quickly build the models specific to the Sinai environment.

– Fixing the damages should not be limited to protection, solidarity and compensation. There is a need to establish programs that can embrace and rehabilitate the cases that suffered direct violence from terrorist organizations.

– Local rights groups in Sinai are playing a role there, but the need still arises for national organizations to be activated there since they have better access to many cases in the peninsula.

This article was first published in: Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies, Human Rights: The Trajectory to Combat Terrorism, Special edition, Cairo, November 2019.  

Related Posts

Imminent Challenges: Hunger and Global Food Security Disruption

Opportunities and Challenges: Turkish Rapprochement with the Syrian Regime

Challenges and Risks: Nigeria’s General Elections

ChatGPT: Promising Applications, Potential Difficulties

TAGGED: Egypt, Featured, Human Rights, terrorism
Ahmed Mohamed June 22, 2020
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

The Future of Relations between Al-Qaeda, Taliban and Islamic State After Al-Zawahiri’s Death
Defense & Security August 27, 2022
Egypt’s Philosophy of Development
ECSS Library July 27, 2021
Internet Blackout: Analytical View of the US Stance on the Internet Shutdown in Iran
International Relations October 18, 2022
The Ninth Summit of Organization of Turkic States: Context and Motives
International Relations November 27, 2022

Latest Tweets

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank, providing decisions-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was establised in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from diffrent generations and scientific desciplines. 

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2022

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?