By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Egypt-France relations: Consensus and strategic partnership
    December 12, 2020
    Beyond Tigray: Wielding Hunger as a Weapon in Ethiopia’s Civil War
    August 22, 2021
    Cautious Trepidation: The International and Regional Response to the Ethiopian Crisis
    February 9, 2022
    Latest News
    Israel’s African gambit
    March 6, 2026
    Geopolitical realism: What does Washington’s return to the African Sahel mean?
    March 5, 2026
    Analysis | Manufacturing opposition: How Israel uses digital platforms to shape Iranian public opinion
    February 14, 2026
    Analysis| Turkey without terrorism: Assessing the trajectory of Turkish–Kurdish reconciliation
    February 12, 2026
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    Strategic Deception in the October War
    October 5, 2023
    Reading into the Global Terrorism Index 2024: A Critical Perspective
    March 25, 2024
    Why isn’t the Yemen war drawing to a close?
    March 27, 2021
    Latest News
    Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
    April 15, 2026
    Encrypted messages “Roaring Lion”: The hidden messages behind the name of the operation against Iran
    March 11, 2026
    Iran war developments
    March 9, 2026
    Manufacturing the enemy : Reframing terrorism in contemporary Western discourse
    March 7, 2026
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Unprecedented Revival: Egypt’s Becomes Self-Sufficient in Natural Gas
    August 29, 2021
    A Comprehensive Vision: The Cultural and Touristic Dimensions of Developing Muhammad Ali’s Gunpowder Magazine
    A Comprehensive Vision: The Cultural and Touristic Dimensions of Developing Muhammad Ali’s Gunpowder Magazine
    June 21, 2022
    Effective Policies: Managing Inflation in Egypt in 2021
    February 8, 2022
    Latest News
    Reading into attacks on maritime navigation in the Arabian Gulf
    March 17, 2026
    Emerging economies in a world without rules: Between opportunity and predicament
    March 5, 2026
    The end of economic globalization: Reading into the 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy
    February 4, 2026
    Weaponization of Resources: The Role of Rare Earth Metals in the US-China Trade War
    May 25, 2025
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: Deconstruction Ethiopia’s Media Discourse over GERD: The “National Project” Delusion
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
The future of US-Iran negotiations
Opinion
Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
Terrorism & Armed Conflict
Russia, China, and the war against Iran
Others
Continental drift
Others
Deadlock in the Strait of Hormuz
Others
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
International RelationsUncategorized

Deconstruction Ethiopia’s Media Discourse over GERD: The “National Project” Delusion

Salah Khalil
Last updated: 2020/08/12 at 3:26 PM
Salah Khalil
Share
13 Min Read
SHARE

When presenting the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) crisis with Egypt and Sudan,
Ethiopian media highlights the unity of all ethnic groups and their support for the construction of
the dam. This is a fallacy. Many groups in Ethiopia oppose the project.
It is difficult to trace methodically the voices that have been expressing their opposition since
2011 for three reasons. The first is that many of these voices that live in Ethiopia, not abroad,
express their opposition in the Amharic or other Ethiopian languages. The second is that
consecutive Ethiopian governments have been keen to exercise utter control over the media
through their different tools. The third is that only 18 per cent of Ethiopians are connected to the
Internet, according to World Bank data. Furthermore, the governments of Prime Minister Abiy
Ahmed and his predecessor Hailemariam Desalegn have repeatedly cut off the Internet in the
country whenever political tensions arose.
It is worth noting this paper primarily traces the content of the Ethiopian criticism of the GERD,
and not the percentage of its supporters or opponents. The latter is an impossible mission for a
country that couldn’t conduct a national census for more than 13 years, nor credible polls, in
light of the deep cultural and linguistic divisions that further reinforce the existing sharp political
divisions.
These critical Ethiopian criticisms, regardless of their popularity, are proof enough of the
fallacious arguments included in the Ethiopian media discourse over GERD which claim that the
dam is a “national project” that all Ethiopians approved its usefulness, its method of execution,
and its direct and indirect financial cost, and that may cause animosity with Egypt and Sudan.

First: Denunciation of local communities in the GERD region

The GERD is located in Benishangul, an Ethiopian regional state, with Assosa as its capital, that
was created following the adoption of the 1995 constitution. Formerly known as Region 6, the
area faces major challenges to economic development.
The ethnic groups in Benishangul include the Berta (25.9 per cent), the Gumuz (21.11 per cent),
the Amhara (21.25 per cent), the Oromo (13.32 per cent), the Shinasha (7.59 per cent), and the
Maw (1.9 per cent).
Muslims and Orthodox Christians comprise 45.4 per cent and 33 per cent, respectively, of the
region’s population. Some 13.5 per cent are Protestants, and 7.1 per cent believe in local
African religions. These groups reject the construction of the GERD in their region because the
building process led to the confiscation of their agricultural lands and their forced displacement
without compensation. Their migration resulted in them losing their only source for livelihood,
which came from agriculture.
In November 2012, the Benishangul People’s Liberation Movement announced its rejection of
the Ethiopian government’s efforts to build the Renaissance Dam in its region, saying the
project is draining the region’s various resources from which the locals don’t benefit. The
movement pointed out the project will lead to the displacement of nearly 50,000 people from the
communities living around the construction site.
On 9 May 2014 the movement launched an armed attack that resulted in the death of nine
Ethiopian soldiers. The Benishangul People’s Liberation Movement announced its responsibility
for the attack, saying it was resisting what it described as the Ethiopian occupation of the region.

The movement, moreover, declared its rejection of the building of the GERD, stating that it will
destroy the region.
There is evidence of this mounting criticism in many sources. For example, the Free
Benishangul account on Twitter published a number of tweets attacking the dam, among which
are:

  • Contradicting basic logic is how the dam is being built on occupied land.
  • Let us ask the people of Benishangul to decide whether they are Ethiopians or Sudanese, and
    we will see after that.
  • The Benishangul group demands halting constructing structures built on land that you do not
    own. Stop the ethnic cleansing of Benishangul.
  • The Benishangul People’s Liberation Movement denounces the Ethiopian government’s
    targeting of its citizens in Benishangul. In the past century Ethiopia enslaved the people of
    Benishangul, now it is killing, displacing and torturing them to build the Renaissance Dam on
    their bones, and we demand the right to self-determination.
  • Criticizing the dam led to the arrest of Abdul-Salam Chinglna, head of the Benishangul
    People’s Liberation Movement, and the head of the Gumuz People’s Democratic Movement,
    Grang Godita, from their homes in Assosa, the capital.
    Following the filling of the dam on 22 June 2020, as tripartite negotiations between Egypt,
    Sudan, and Ethiopia were ongoing, a tweet on the same account said “Ethiopia doesn’t have
    the right to do anything on the occupied lands of Benishangul, and Abiy Ahmed doesn’t have
    the right to build anything until the people of Benishangul have the right to self-determination.
    Stop ethnic cleansing in the name of your dam.”
    Another account, by the name of al khanagy, who supports Benishangul’s right to
    independence, tweeted “if Ethiopia rejects the colonial boundaries agreement and those of
    colonial waters, agreed upon in 1902, it is time [for Ethiopia] to leave the lands of Benishangul.”
    On the same account was also tweeted “we are being kicked out of our land without
    compensation. The head of the movement was arrested and 80 people were killed during
    protests against land confiscation in Benishangul.”
    On the account of a female Benishangul activist was written “apologies for not celebrating the
    dam, because we are not privileged to live in urban area. We are busy worrying about the
    obliteration of our identities, beliefs, and our entire existence during the mass killing exercised
    by your government.”

Second: Criticizing corruption and the mismanagement of the GERD file


Generally, Ethiopians criticized their successive governments, particularly that of Abiy Ahmed,
for the mismanagement of the Renaissance Dam file at the construction and negotiation levels
as well as the massive corruption that overshadows the GERD management since 2011.
The English-language account of Ethiopia2day published a document accusing Prime Minister
Abiy Ahmed of appointing his brother-in-law Alemayehu G. Mariam as head of the Ethiopian
Diaspora Trust Fund to support the construction of the GERD. The account mentioned that the
decision held a discrepancy in that Mariam was a staunch proponent of the GERD from the very
beginning and then he turned to support the building of the dam before Abiy Ahmed gave him
the task of providing financial support for it.
Countless Ethiopian voices oppose the method Ethiopia adopts in its negotiations with Egypt
and Sudan, with some of them saying “resolving the conflict over the Blue Nile water between
Egypt and Ethiopia will not take place without encouraging and facilitating investments between

the two countries and the contribution in energy generation in Ethiopia to end the current
shortage, which will allow the filling of the dam very slowly.”
Political activist Gebrehiwot Belay explained that Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed is using the “It’s
My Dam” campaign to cover up his failure and achieve his aspirations of becoming the seventh
king of Ethiopia. Belay wondered whether Ahmed’s priority should be the River Nile or saving
his country from disintegration.
Abraham Asefa wrote that “the main problem is that the prime minister is a child and a prophet
at the same time. After 27 dark years of looting and corruption during the GERD construction
comes the messing with the dam file and engaging in negotiations sponsored by the US and the
World Bank to create a brouhaha to cover up for the ensuing chaos that would allow putting off
elections indefinitely, and to end up in chaos and power-grabbing.”
Professor Muse Tegegne tweeted that “the GERD project is marred by corruption and
incompetence in the overall disaster,” while Ztseat Save Adna, MD wrote that the majority of the
Ethiopians participating with the hashtags FillTheDam and It’sMyDam had stood in opposition of
the dam two years ago. Many of them said at the time the dam’s target is to harm Egypt and
bears no benefits for Ethiopia in a sign of the excessive politicization of the GERD on the part of
successive Ethiopian governments.
Civil society activist Ephrem Madebo wrote on his account he believes that not even 80 per cent
of the project which was planned to be finished five years ago was completed. The dam is
nothing because it was being used as a milking cow for the Tigray Liberation Front, he added.
Political researcher Rashid Abdi explained that the meeting of African leaders on the
Renaissance Dam did not change anything, as the “penetration” was completely misleading,
pointing to the use of the project at the present time by the Amhara group to regain control of
the wealth and power in the country at the expense of other groups, on top of which is the
Oromo.
Political activist Zega Ras-Work pointed out that “the poorly built dam could bear catastrophic
economic, environmental and humanitarian repercussions. I believe if Egypt and Ethiopia
agreed to work together on the building of the dam, with the help of the international community,
the project will bear positive returns.”
In the end, these Ethiopian viewpoints assure two key facts that should be focused upon in this
complicated situation. The first is that the Ethiopian government’s claim that the GERD is a
national project that has won the support of all Ethiopians is merely a part of the misleading
media discourse adopted by the government of Abiy Ahmed since his rise to the helm in April

  1. The second is that there are many fair and wise Ethiopian voices with whom a
    constructive and sustainable agreement could be sealed on the joint management of the Blue
    Nile water to the benefit of Egypt, Sudan, and Ethiopia and to save the three countries, and the
    entire region, from a possible conflict that may be triggered by the irresponsible approach of the
    Ethiopian government.

Related Posts

Israel’s African gambit

Geopolitical realism: What does Washington’s return to the African Sahel mean?

Analysis | Manufacturing opposition: How Israel uses digital platforms to shape Iranian public opinion

Analysis| Turkey without terrorism: Assessing the trajectory of Turkish–Kurdish reconciliation

TAGGED: Ethiopia, Featured, GERD, Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, Media Discourse
Salah Khalil August 12, 2020
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print
Salah Khalil
By Salah Khalil
A researcher at Al-Ahram Center for Social and Historical Studies

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

Iran’s Cyberattack on Israel: Background and Significance
International Relations March 29, 2022
World shifts
Publications June 1, 2020
 As Escalation Intensifies, What’s on Netanyahu’s Target Radar?
Arab & Regional Studies August 13, 2024
A New Iranian Scene Taking Shape?
Opinions October 24, 2022

Latest Tweets

//

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank providing decision-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was established in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from different generations and scientific disciplines.

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

Who we are

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS) is an independent Egyptian think tank established in 2018. The Center adopts a national, scientific perspective in examining strategic issues and challenges at the local, regional, and international levels, particularly those related to Egypt’s national security and core national interests.

The Center’s output is geared toward addressing national priorities, offering anticipatory visions for policy and decision alternatives, and enhancing awareness of various transformations through diverse forms of scientific production and research activities.

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?