By using ECSS site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
  • Home
  • International Relations
    International Relations
    Show More
    Top News
    Deconstructing Ethiopia’s media discourse on GERD: Technical fallacies
    July 21, 2020
    Widening the scope: Ethiopia’s diplomatic activity amid unrest
    March 4, 2021
    The New Republic: Determinants of Egypt’s Foreign Policy
    September 30, 2021
    Latest News
    Ethiopia’s 2026 elections: Procedural modernization and the limits of political inclusiveness
    June 20, 2026
    A historic role: Egypt and the Palestinian cause since 1948
    May 23, 2026
    Employing maritime corridors in conflicts: Lessons learned
    May 20, 2026
    Israel’s security and economic conundrum:How does Israel confront the challenges of a protracted war with Iran?
    May 2, 2026
  • Defense & Security
    Defense & Security
    Show More
    Top News
    Egypt’s Defense Industries: Steady Steps and Promising Prospects
    Egypt’s Defense Industries: Steady Steps and Promising Prospects
    December 18, 2021
    Arms Internationalization: The UN and Israeli Armament Activities
    March 13, 2024
    Task Force 59: The New US Military Deployment Pattern in the Middle East
    November 30, 2022
    Latest News
    Between two camps: Reading into ISIS discourse on the US-Israeli war on Iran
    April 15, 2026
    Encrypted messages “Roaring Lion”: The hidden messages behind the name of the operation against Iran
    March 11, 2026
    Iran war developments
    March 9, 2026
    Manufacturing the enemy : Reframing terrorism in contemporary Western discourse
    March 7, 2026
  • Public Policy
    Public Policy
    Show More
    Top News
    Achievements of the 2020 elections
    January 9, 2021
    Egypt’s IPO Program: Maximizing the Private Sector’s Role in the Economy
    Egypt’s IPO Program: Maximizing the Private Sector’s Role in the Economy
    January 25, 2022
    The Repercussion of Reduced Oil Prices amid the Coronavirus on Egypt’s Economy
    September 20, 2020
    Latest News
    Egyptian tourism and cruise ships: Efforts yet to bear fruit
    July 8, 2026
    US trade policy in 2026: International moves and strategic implications
    May 25, 2026
    Analysis| Egypt economic path and IMF negotiations amid escalating regional energy crisis
    May 11, 2026
    From global shock to Egypt’s economy: Analyzing the impact of the Iran war on energy security
    May 3, 2026
  • Analysis
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Situation Assessment
    • Readings
  • Activities
    • Conferences
    • ECSS Agenda
    • Panel Discussion
    • Seminar
    • Workshops
  • ECSS Shop
  • العربية
  • Defense & Security
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022,
Reading: News Analysis: Ceasefire A positive Step Towards Libyan Crisis Resolution
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Egyptian popular consciousness and the 30 June Revolution: A historical reading
Unit for Studies of National Identity, Values, and Beliefs in Egypt
Egypt between two revolutions (July 1952 – June 2013)
Activities & Events Others
Egyptian tourism and cruise ships: Efforts yet to bear fruit
Public Policy
The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies holds a workshop on “The Place of the June 30 Revolution Among Egypt’s Revolutions”
Activities & Events
How did the 30 June Revolution preserve the Arab World?
the Historical Studies Program
Aa
ECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic StudiesECSS - Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies
Aa
  • اللغة العربية
  • International Relations
  • Defense & Security
  • Special Edition
  • Public Policy
  • Analysis
  • Activities & Events
  • Home
  • اللغة العربية
  • Categories
    • International Relations
    • Defense & Security
    • Public Policy
    • Analysis
    • Special Edition
    • Activities & Events
    • Opinions Articles
  • Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Advertise
All Rights Reserved to ECSS © 2022, Powered by EgyptYo Business Services.
Analysis

News Analysis: Ceasefire A positive Step Towards Libyan Crisis Resolution

Dr.Ahmed Eleiba
Last updated: 2020/10/25 at 12:21 PM
Dr.Ahmed Eleiba
Share
6 Min Read
SHARE

The United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL) announced that two parties constituting the Joint Military Commission (5+5) reached an agreement on permanent ceasefire at the conclusion of the fourth round of this path, which had continued for a whole week.

According to the UN Envoy, Stephanie Williams, both parties agreed on ordering mercenaries to get out of the country within three months, setting-up a joint operation room and a limited military force made up of regular military personnel. 

Both military delegations agreed on classifying armed forces in order to integrate their personnel into the state’s institutions as well as the restructuring of forces responsible for securing oil complexes.

Williams said that the delegates of the Libyan National Army and the Government of National Accord asked the UNSMIL that the ceasefire deal be sent to the U.N. Security Council to be accredited and to ensure full and unconditional respect from all parties towards it. She pointed out that the UN Mission will send the agreement to the Security Council and that the international community should support Libyans in implementing the ceasefire.

It is expected that the joint commission will meet during the upcoming weeks in order to jump start the sub-committees responsible for unifying the military institution, cooperating in the field of terrorism-combating, integrating the armed personnel and monitoring the departure of the mercenaries as well as being responsible for the follow-up of security arrangements.

It is envisaged that the outputs of the Libyan military path (5+5) in Geneva are an advanced step towards creating a favourable atmosphere necessary for a new political process that will wind the Skhirat agreement, with focus on the Berlin process and the Cairo declaration concerning the Libyan crisis resolution.

Within this context, there are two ways that ought to be differentiated from one another. The first: the consensual approach between the military field representatives on a tactical level, which comes in the light of understandings regarding security arrangements in the upcoming political stage. These arrangements being based on power sharing and wealth distribution. 

The security arrangements include the form and pattern of deployment in the centre of the country namely Sirte, which will likely be the new government seat within a comprehensive political framework. This aims at keeping it away from regional polarisation between the east and west of the country and safeguarding it from the militias’ power. This is to be done through the participation of joint police and military forces from both sides. The arrangements should also be linked to the economic sphere, regarding the restructuring of the oil complexes’ guards so as to allow a joint control and security administration. As for the strategic issues concerning the military sphere, it seems that they will be moved to the future, especially the issue of unifying the military institution, ending foreign presence, for what has actually been agreed upon is terminating foreign mercenaries, not the permanent foreign military presence.

Moreover, signs given by Williams about the continuance of the military path in parallel with the aforementioned preliminary stage are considered a positive mechanism on the way of creating a favourable atmosphere in dealing with dilemmas constituting obstacles before these main issues. 

However, it is likely that this will require long-term procedures and arrangements that may take several years and will be judged in the light of the upcoming political process whether it will transfer the country to sustainable political stability or just a cycle within several and consecutive transitional stages that Libya witnessed during the past decade is yet unclear. 

On the whole, it can be said that the military path outputs have accomplished a qualitative leap in the path of political and economic process arrangements. 

It remains to be seen whether the comprehensive political dialogue will result in realising a qualitative leap concerning military issues in general. These issues are connected to the future of the political process in the post-preliminary stage, which will continue for eighteen months. 

The results it may bring forth as a next step in the form of a permanent constitution are a parliament and an elected government. 

On the operational level, it will depend on a number of initial tests such as success in ending the mercenaries’ presence in the country, the ability to stop manifestations of political and security chaos in a way that reinforces the invulnerability of the Libyan state, which was torn by conflict. These previous steps must be taken to be able to confront challenges and dangers in order to restore the state’s independence and sovereignty.

Related Posts

Scenarios for shaping international and regional influence in the Middle East after the war

The future of US-Iran negotiations

Analysis | Manufacturing opposition: How Israel uses digital platforms to shape Iranian public opinion

Analysis| Turkey without terrorism: Assessing the trajectory of Turkish–Kurdish reconciliation

TAGGED: Ceasefire, Featured, Libya crisis, UN
Dr.Ahmed Eleiba October 25, 2020
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe

Latest Articles

GERD Back to The Fore: Contradictory Messages and Political Employment
International Relations October 18, 2020
Development Trends in Sinai
Development & Society May 2, 2023
Lost Childhood and Education: Who Compensates Gaza’s Children?
Palestinian & Israeli Studies May 19, 2024
Internet Blackout: Analytical View of the US Stance on the Internet Shutdown in Iran
International Relations October 18, 2022

Latest Tweets

//

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies is an independent non-profit think tank providing decision-makers by Policy alternatives, the center was established in 2018 and comprises a group of experts and researchers from different generations and scientific disciplines.

International Relations

  • African Studies
  • American Studies
  • Arab & Regional Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • European Studies
  • Palestinian & Israeli Studies

Defence & Security

  • Armament
  • Cyber Security
  • Extremism
  • Terrorism & Armed Conflict

Public Policies

  • Development & Society
  • Economic & Energy Studies
  • Egypt & World Stats
  • Media Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Women & Family Studies

Who we are

The Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies (ECSS) is an independent Egyptian think tank established in 2018. The Center adopts a national, scientific perspective in examining strategic issues and challenges at the local, regional, and international levels, particularly those related to Egypt’s national security and core national interests.

The Center’s output is geared toward addressing national priorities, offering anticipatory visions for policy and decision alternatives, and enhancing awareness of various transformations through diverse forms of scientific production and research activities.

All Rights Reserved to Egyptian Center for Strategic Studies - ECSS © 2023

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?